IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p191-d175043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy Threats and Protection Recommendations for the Use of Geosocial Network Data in Research

Author

Listed:
  • Ourania Kounadi

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Department of Geo-information Processing, University of Twente, 7514 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
    Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Bernd Resch

    (Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
    Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA)

  • Andreas Petutschnig

    (Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

Abstract

Inference attacks and protection measures are two sides of the same coin. Although the former aims to reveal information while the latter aims to hide it, they both increase awareness regarding the risks and threats from social media apps. On the one hand, inference attack studies explore the types of personal information that can be revealed and the methods used to extract it. An additional risk is that geosocial media data are collected massively for research purposes, and the processing or publication of these data may further compromise individual privacy. On the other hand, consistent and increasing research on location protection measures promises solutions that mitigate disclosure risks. In this paper, we examine recent research efforts on the spectrum of privacy issues related to geosocial network data and identify the contributions and limitations of these research efforts. Furthermore, we provide protection recommendations to researchers that share, anonymise, and store social media data or publish scientific results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ourania Kounadi & Bernd Resch & Andreas Petutschnig, 2018. "Privacy Threats and Protection Recommendations for the Use of Geosocial Network Data in Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:191-:d:175043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Kovacs-Gyori & Alina Ristea & Clemens Havas & Bernd Resch & Pablo Cabrera-Barona, 2018. "#London2012: Towards Citizen-Contributed Urban Planning Through Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99.
    2. William Lee Croft & Wei Shi & Jörg-Rüdiger Sack & Jean-Pierre Corriveau, 2017. "Comparison of approaches of geographic partitioning for data anonymization," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 221-248, July.
    3. Bernd Resch & Anja Summa & Peter Zeile & Michael Strube, 2016. "Citizen-Centric Urban Planning through Extracting Emotion Information from Twitter in an Interdisciplinary Space-Time-Linguistics Algorithm," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masahiko Haraguchi & Akihiko Nishino & Akira Kodaka & Maura Allaire & Upmanu Lall & Liao Kuei-Hsien & Kaya Onda & Kota Tsubouchi & Naohiko Kohtake, 2022. "Human mobility data and analysis for urban resilience: A systematic review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1507-1535, June.
    2. Bernd Resch & Inga Puetz & Matthias Bluemke & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Jakob Miksch, 2020. "An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyzing Urban Spaces: The Case of Urban Walkability and Bikeability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Katerina Vgena & Angeliki Kitsiou & Christos Kalloniatis & Stefanos Gritzalis, 2022. "Determining the Role of Social Identity Attributes to the Protection of Users’ Privacy in Social Media," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Gonzalo Wandosell & María Concepción Parra-Meroño & Raul Baños, 2019. "Online Store Locator: An Essential Resource for Retailers in the 21st Century," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilvi Nummi, 2018. "Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 100-115.
    2. Yong Gao & Yuanyuan Chen & Lan Mu & Shize Gong & Pengcheng Zhang & Yu Liu, 2022. "Measuring urban sentiments from social media data: a dual-polarity metric approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 199-221, April.
    3. Ruixue Liu & Jing Xiao, 2020. "Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Bernd Resch & Inga Puetz & Matthias Bluemke & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Jakob Miksch, 2020. "An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyzing Urban Spaces: The Case of Urban Walkability and Bikeability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Raquel Pérez‐delHoyo & Higinio Mora & José Manuel Nolasco‐Vidal & Rubén Abad‐Ortiz & Rafael A. Mollá‐Sirvent, 2021. "Addressing new challenges in smart urban planning using Information and Communication Technologies," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 342-354, May.
    6. Higinio Mora & Raquel Pérez-delHoyo & José F. Paredes-Pérez & Rafael A. Mollá-Sirvent, 2018. "Analysis of Social Networking Service Data for Smart Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Fernando Santa & Roberto Henriques & Joaquín Torres-Sospedra & Edzer Pebesma, 2019. "A Statistical Approach for Studying the Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Geolocated Tweets in Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Inmaculada Mohino & Borja Moya-Gómez & Juan Carlos García-Palomares, 2020. "The Rio Olympic Games: A Look into City Dynamics through the Lens of Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Helen Roberts & Bernd Resch & Jon Sadler & Lee Chapman & Andreas Petutschnig & Stefan Zimmer, 2018. "Investigating the Emotional Responses of Individuals to Urban Green Space Using Twitter Data: A Critical Comparison of Three Different Methods of Sentiment Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 21-33.
    10. Ghasem Javadi & Mohammad Taleai, 2020. "Integration of User Generated Geo-contents and Official Data to Assess Quality of Life in Intra-national Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 205-235, November.
    11. Kim, Daehwan & Seo, Ducksu & Kwon, Youngsang, 2021. "Novel trends in SNS customers in food and beverage patronage: An empirical study of metropolitan cities in South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Anna Kovacs-Gyori & Alina Ristea & Clemens Havas & Bernd Resch & Pablo Cabrera-Barona, 2018. "#London2012: Towards Citizen-Contributed Urban Planning Through Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99.
    13. Sakshi Khare & Amit Chatterjee, 2024. "The relationship between urban built environment and happiness in Bhopal, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21487-21502, August.
    14. Bo Zhang & Yang Song & Dingyi Liu & Zhongzhong Zeng & Shuying Guo & Qiuyi Yang & Yuhan Wen & Wenji Wang & Xiwei Shen, 2023. "Descriptive and Network Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Urban Public Space through Social Media: A Case Study of Bryant Park, NY," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Yichen Yang & Shifeng Fang & Hua Wu & Jiaqiang Du & Haomiao Tu & Wei He, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Trends and Driving Factors of Urban Livability in the Yangtze River Delta Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Tasnim M. A. Zayet & Maizatul Akmar Ismail & Kasturi Dewi Varathan & Rafidah M. D. Noor & Hui Na Chua & Angela Lee & Yeh Ching Low & Sheena Kaur Jaswant Singh, 2021. "Investigating transportation research based on social media analysis: a systematic mapping review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6383-6421, August.
    17. Sveta Milusheva & Robert Marty & Guadalupe Bedoya & Sarah Williams & Elizabeth Resor & Arianna Legovini, 2021. "Applying machine learning and geolocation techniques to social media data (Twitter) to develop a resource for urban planning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Seongbeom Park & Jaekyung Lee & Yunmi Park, 2022. "Analysis of Residential Satisfaction Changes by the Land Bank Program Using Text Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:191-:d:175043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.