IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p253-d472915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruixue Liu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Jing Xiao

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

It is essential to give full consideration to the potential barriers facing urban parks from their better functions and meeting residents’ needs in terms of collective perception and satisfaction. This paper presents the methods of using social media (Dianping) data to investigate the potential factors affecting people’s satisfaction with urban parks in Shenzhen, China. Textual analysis and sentiment analysis make it feasible to identify the factors influencing people’s experience in parks. By measuring emotions towards these factors, a multiple linear regression model helps to explore the relationships between the factors and people’s satisfaction, and among them, determines the key ones. The results present the nine key factors of urban parks that affect the users’ satisfaction, in addition to the common factors by previous studies including park size, vegetation, recreation facility, landscape visual effect, maintenance of facilities and plants, and environment cleanliness. A series of contextual factors also significantly influence people’s satisfaction, such as sign system, mosquito and air quality. Among these, sign system has the strongest influence. The results increase the understanding of the human-urban park relationship and identify the characteristics of urban parks that facilitate the degree of satisfaction promotion. Our findings may provide the managerial guidelines for planners and decision-makers to optimize people’s imperative qualities of urban life.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruixue Liu & Jing Xiao, 2020. "Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:253-:d:472915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/253/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/253/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Yi & Koo, Tay T.R., 2014. "Flying Australia–Europe via China: A qualitative analysis of the factors affecting travelers' choice of Chinese carriers using online comments data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 23-29.
    2. (Catherine) Zhang, Jie & Savage, Scott J. & Chen, Yongmin, 2015. "Consumer uncertainty and price discrimination through online coupons: An empirical study of restaurants in Shanghai," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 43-55.
    3. Helen Roberts & Bernd Resch & Jon Sadler & Lee Chapman & Andreas Petutschnig & Stefan Zimmer, 2018. "Investigating the Emotional Responses of Individuals to Urban Green Space Using Twitter Data: A Critical Comparison of Three Different Methods of Sentiment Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 21-33.
    4. Hsiao-Lan Liu & Yu-Sheng Shen, 2014. "The Impact of Green Space Changes on Air Pollution and Microclimates: A Case Study of the Taipei Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Young-Chang Lee & Keun-Ho Kim, 2015. "Attitudes of Citizens towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces for Urban Sustainability: The Case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Yang Zhang & Agnes E. Van den Berg & Terry Van Dijk & Gerd Weitkamp, 2017. "Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Tsurumi, Tetsuya & Managi, Shunsuke, 2015. "Environmental value of green spaces in Japan: An application of the life satisfaction approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Cuomo, Maria Teresa & Tortora, Debora & Foroudi, Pantea & Giordano, Alex & Festa, Giuseppe & Metallo, Gerardino, 2021. "Digital transformation and tourist experience co-design: Big social data for planning cultural tourism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Bernd Resch & Anja Summa & Peter Zeile & Michael Strube, 2016. "Citizen-Centric Urban Planning through Extracting Emotion Information from Twitter in an Interdisciplinary Space-Time-Linguistics Algorithm," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siya Cheng & Ziling Huang & Haochen Pan & Shuaiqing Wang & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Comparative Study of Park Evaluation Based on Text Analysis of Social Media: A Case Study of 50 Popular Parks in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Gao & Yuanyuan Chen & Lan Mu & Shize Gong & Pengcheng Zhang & Yu Liu, 2022. "Measuring urban sentiments from social media data: a dual-polarity metric approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 199-221, April.
    2. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    3. Koo, Tay T.R. & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Park, Jin-Woo & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2017. "The effect of enhanced international air access on the demand for peripheral tourism destinations: Evidence from air itinerary choice behaviour of Korean visitors to Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 116-129.
    4. Agnieszka Mandziuk & Dagmara Stangierska & Beata Fornal-Pieniak & Jerzy Gębski & Barbara Żarska & Marta Kiraga, 2022. "Preferences of Young Adults concerning the Pocket Parks with Water Reservoirs in the Aspect of Willingness to Pay (WTP) in Warsaw City, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Xin Li & Kenan Li & Yongjian Li, 2023. "Platform Operations under Dual-Channel Catering Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Kinga Kimic & Albert Fekete, 2022. "The Ratio of Biologically Vital Areas as a Measure of the Sustainability of Urban Parks Using the Example of Budapest, Hungary," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Sinan He & Dingkai Chen & Xiaoqi Shang & Linwei Han & Longyu Shi, 2022. "Resident Satisfaction of Urban Green Spaces through the Lens of Landsenses Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Kaiwen Su & Jie Ren & Chuyun Cui & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2022. "Do Value Orientations and Beliefs Play a Positive Role in Shaping Personal Norms for Urban Green Space Conservation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Junga Lee & Christopher D. Ellis & Yun Eui Choi & Soojin You & Jinhyung Chon, 2015. "An Integrated Approach to Mitigation Wetland Site Selection: A Case Study in Gwacheon, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Liu, Jiayu & Beck, Christina Starr & Gao, Yi, 2024. "Can you judge a book by its cover? An analysis of travelers’ perceptions of airline logos and airlines’ business models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Wei, Di & Wang, Yuan & Jiang, Yuxiao & Guan, Xueqing & Lu, Yi, 2024. "Deciphering the effect of user-generated content on park visitation: A comparative study of nine Chinese cities in the Pearl River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Yijun Zhang & Suzanne Mavoa & Jinfeng Zhao & Deborah Raphael & Melody Smith, 2020. "The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Jake M. Robinson & Anna Jorgensen & Ross Cameron & Paul Brindley, 2020. "Let Nature Be Thy Medicine: A Socioecological Exploration of Green Prescribing in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Cuesta-Valiño, Pedro & Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Pablo & García-Henche, Blanca, 2022. "Word of mouth and digitalization in small retailers: Tradition, authenticity, and change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Ciprian Obrad, 2023. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Green Spaces and Daily Life in Small Urban Settings: Romanian Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Jongwook Tae & Daeyoung Jeong & Jinhyung Chon, 2022. "How Can Apartment-Complex Landscaping Space Improve Residents’ Psychological Well-Being?: The Case of the Capital Region in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Fangzheng Li & Yinan Sun & Xiong Li & Xinhua Hao & Wanyi Li & Yun Qian & Haimeng Liu & Haiyan Sun, 2016. "Research on the Sustainable Development of Green-Space in Beijing Using the Dynamic Systems Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Chaonan Hu & Nana Luo & Chao Cai & Yarui Cui & Hongtao Gao & Xing Yan, 2024. "Meso-Scale Impacts of the Urban Structure Metrics on PM2.5 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Dagmara Stangierska & Iwona Kowalczuk & Ksenia Juszczak-Szelągowska & Katarzyna Widera & Weronika Ferenc, 2022. "Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens—The Case of Warsaw," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Xu, Yong & Yuan, Ling & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Radulescu, Magdalena & Mallek, Sabrine & Zhao, Xin, 2023. "Making technological innovation greener: Does firm digital transformation work?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:253-:d:472915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.