IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v3y2018i1p100-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Pilvi Nummi

    (Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Finland)

Abstract

In participatory urban planning, understanding local stakeholders’ viewpoints is central, and, thus, gathering local knowledge has become a frequent task in planning practice. However, the built cultural heritage is usually evaluated by experts neglecting the values and opinions of citizens. In this study, a crowdsourcing model for assessing local residents’ viewpoints and values related to the built cultural heritage of Nikkilä was developed. The aim was to find out if crowdsourcing with public participation GIS and social media is a functional method for revealing local people’s values, place-based memories and experiences. In the case study, non-professional knowledge was compared with expert knowledge and valuable knowledge about the intangible aspects of the built cultural heritage was reached through place-based memories. Apart from that, social media provided visual representations of place-based experiences and a tool for building a collective memory. Based on the results, it is evident that a multi-method crowdsourcing model can be a functional model for crowdsourcing local knowledge. However, there are several challenges in analysing data and using the knowledge in urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilvi Nummi, 2018. "Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 100-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v3:y:2018:i:1:p:100-115
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v3i1.1266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1266
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v3i1.1266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilvi Nummi, 2017. "Social Media Data Analysis in Urban e-Planning," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 18-31, October.
    2. Maarit Kahila-Tani & Anna Broberg & Marketta Kyttä & Taylor Tyger, 2016. "Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 195-214, March.
    3. Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "Social Media-based Government Explained: Utilization Model, Implementation Scenarios, and Relationships," Springer Books, in: Imed Boughzala & Marijn Janssen & Saïd Assar (ed.), Case Studies in e-Government 2.0, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 15-28, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Charlton & Ian Babelon & Richard Watson & Caitlin Hafferty, 2023. "Phygitally Smarter? A Critically Pragmatic Agenda for Smarter Engagement in British Planning and Beyond," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 17-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilvi Nummi, 2018. "Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 100-115.
    2. Erik Glaas & Mattias Hjerpe & Martin Karlson & Tina-Simone Neset, 2020. "Visualization for Citizen Participation: User Perceptions on a Mainstreamed Online Participatory Tool and Its Usefulness for Climate Change Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Pisso Nseke, 2018. "Social Media a Two-Edged Sword to E-Governance: The Role of Social Media in Cameroon’s Democracy," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 30-33, January.
    4. Mattias Hjerpe & Erik Glaas & Sofie Storbjörk, 2018. "Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 159-169.
    5. Fernando Santa & Roberto Henriques & Joaquín Torres-Sospedra & Edzer Pebesma, 2019. "A Statistical Approach for Studying the Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Geolocated Tweets in Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Knöll, Martin, 2018. "Mobile Partizipation in der gesundheitsfördernden Stadtgestaltung: Zwei Fallbeispiele zu Datenerfassung und Interaktion im Stadtraum," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Baumgart, Sabine & Köckler, Heike & Ritzinger, Anne & Rüdiger, Andrea (ed.), Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte, volume 8, pages 387-401, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Mattias Hjerpe & Erik Glaas & Sofie Storbjörk, 2018. "Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 159-169.
    8. Lion Lukas Naumann & Michael Nadler, 2023. "Erfolgsfaktoren und Quartierszufriedenheit in neuen Stadtquartieren – Eine geodatenbasierte Untersuchung in Düsseldorf [Success factors and neighborhood satisfaction in new urban neighborhoods—a ge," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 9(2), pages 139-176, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v3:y:2018:i:1:p:100-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.