IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v4y2015i2p393-420d50020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need for Participative Interventions in Child Protection: Perspectives from Nuevo León State

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Cabiati

    (Department of Sociology, Catholic University of Milan, Largo A. Gemelli 1, Milano 20123, Italy)

Abstract

This article examines characteristics and social work practices within the Mexican child protection system by combining observations of practice with the voices and the views expressed by managers, social workers, families, children and young people. The results of the study confirm the need for and desire to adopt a participatory approach, in preference to the individualistic ideas that currently dominates practice. The traditional Mexican culture, the implicit and explicit representation of family and the social problems connected to drug trade conflicts appear to have contributed to a child protection system with a “child-centered perspective”, characterized by asymmetric power relationships, lacking the empowerment and engagement of service users. These practices seem to be counter to the legislative framework and appear ineffective. Reflections regarding how family needs are identified, understood and addressed reveal a commitment to find new ways of working with families among service users and providers. However, the biggest challenge in the Mexican context is to balance the protection of the child with support to their parents; without ensuring the former, the latter will remain a partial and counter-productive work practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Cabiati, 2015. "The Need for Participative Interventions in Child Protection: Perspectives from Nuevo León State," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:393-420:d:50020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/2/393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/2/393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carme Montserrat, 2014. "The Child Protection System from the Perspective of Young People: Messages from 3 Studies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Fraser, Mark W. & Walton, Elaine & Lewis, Robert E. & Pecora, Peter J. & Walton, Wendel K., 1996. "An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 335-361.
    3. Doug Magnuson, 2014. "The Productive Uses of Conflict in Child Protection," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Susan Young & Margaret McKenzie & Cecilie Omre & Liv Schjelderup & Shayne Walker, 2014. "Practicing from Theory: Thinking and Knowing to “Do” Child Protection Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathan Hughes & Carolina Munoz-Guzman, 2015. "Understanding and Supporting “Families with Complex Needs”: An Editorial," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-5, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Bellamy, Jennifer L., 2008. "Behavioral problems following reunification of children in long-term foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 216-228, February.
    3. Anna Massons-Ribas & M. Àngels Balsells & Neus Cortada, 2021. "The Participation of Children and Adolescents in the Protection System: The Case of the Spanish Legislation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Malvaso, Catia G. & Delfabbro, Paul H., 2020. "Description and evaluation of a trial program aimed at reunifying adolescents in statutory long-term out-of-home care with their birth families: The adolescent reunification program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    6. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    7. Wulczyn, Fred & Chen, Lijun & Courtney, Mark, 2011. "Family reunification in a social structural context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 424-430, March.
    8. Kahn, Jessica M. & Schwalbe, Craig, 2010. "The timing to and risk factors associated with child welfare system recidivism at two decision-making points," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1035-1044, July.
    9. Goemans, Anouk & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Damen, Harm & Pijnenburg, Huub & Van Holen, Frank, 2016. "Reunification of foster children: Factors associated with reunification outcomes in Flanders and the Netherlands," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 284-292.
    10. Balsells, M. Ángeles & Fuentes-Peláez, Nuria & Pastor, Crescencia, 2017. "Listening to the voices of children in decision-making: A challenge for the child protection system in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 418-425.
    11. Miller, Keith A. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Jordan, Kathy, 2006. "Trouble on the journey home: Reunification failures in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 260-274, March.
    12. Faver, Catherine A. & Crawford, Sharon L. & Combs-Orme, Terri, 1999. "Services for child maltreatment: Challenges for research and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 89-109, February.
    13. Wood, S. & Scourfield, J. & Stabler, L. & Addis, S. & Wilkins, D. & Forrester, D. & Brand, S.L., 2022. "How might changes to family income affect the likelihood of children being in out-of-home care? Evidence from a realist and qualitative rapid evidence assessment of interventions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Lindner, Abigail Rose & Hanlon, Ryan, 2024. "Outcomes of youth with foster care experiences based on permanency outcome – Adoption, aging out, long-term foster care, and reunification: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Biehal, Nina, 2005. "Working with adolescents at risk of out of home care: The effectiveness of specialist teams," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1045-1059, September.
    16. Barth, Richard P., 1997. "Permanent Placements for Young Children Placed in Foster Care: A Proposal for a Child Welfare Services Performance Standard," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 615-631, December.
    17. Paulsen, Veronika & Berg, Berit, 2016. "Social support and interdependency in transition to adulthood from child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 125-131.
    18. Church II, Wesley T., 2006. "From start to finish: The duration of Hispanic children in out-of home placements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1007-1023, September.
    19. Meezan, William & McBeath, Bowen, 2008. "Market-based disparities in foster care outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 388-406, April.
    20. Kimberlin, Sara E. & Anthony, Elizabeth K. & Austin, Michael J., 2009. "Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 471-481, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:393-420:d:50020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.