IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i2p83-d1581734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Youth Are Not All the Same: On the Appropriateness and Limits of Participatory Methods in Youth Research

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Butti

    (Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland)

Abstract

The field of youth studies has traditionally promoted participatory methods, assuming that young people prefer creativity over standard methods like traditional ethnography or one-to-one interviews. However, my experience in Medellín, Colombia, reveals complications. While youth with strong ties to civil society and activism found comfort in participatory methods, youth who were out of school or in conflict with the law felt alienated by formalized processes and institutional spaces. Too often, participatory techniques homogenize youth perspectives, taking the views of socially engaged youth as representative of all youth. Researchers should instead acknowledge diverse youth experiences and employ different methods for different youth groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Butti, 2025. "Youth Are Not All the Same: On the Appropriateness and Limits of Participatory Methods in Youth Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:83-:d:1581734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/83/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradbury-Jones, Caroline & Isham, Louise & Taylor, Julie, 2018. "The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 80-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt-Sane, Megan M. & Benninger, Elizabeth & Spilsbury, James C., 2023. "Youth Lens methodology: Critical participatory action research with youth in Cleveland, Ohio," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Stefania Velardo & Christina M. Pollard & Jessica Shipman & Sue Booth, 2021. "How Do Disadvantaged Children Perceive, Understand and Experience Household Food Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Sarah Baird & Laura Camfield & Ashraful Haque & Nicola Jones & Anas Masri & Kate Pincock & Mahesh C. Puri, 2021. "No One Left Behind: Using Mixed-Methods Research to Identify and Learn from Socially Marginalised Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(5), pages 1163-1188, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:83-:d:1581734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.