IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i10p552-d1500255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Being and the Ought to Be of Citizenship in European Social Innovation Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Alba Talón Villacañas

    (Department of Sociology and Social Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitat de València, 46021 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Social Innovation is defined as both a concept and a tool for social change that, in recent decades, has formed the backbone of numerous policies implemented by the European Commission. However, part of the academic literature identifies several limitations in the discursive potentialities presented within the institutional framework. Accordingly, the aim of this article is to examine how European social policies on Social Innovation conceptualise the ‘being’ and ‘ought to be’ of citizenship, or the subject, from a critical Foucauldian perspective, with a view to problematising its implications for the analysis of the social reality represented in these policies. To this end, a qualitative strategy employing discourse analysis and the ‘logics of critical explanation’ approach is utilised, analysing 26 institutional documents from the European Commission issued between 2010 and 2024. The findings indicate that this discursive institutional framework construes citizenship as embodying a rational, active, capable, and conscious subject, committed to solving social problems. This conception of the ‘being’ of a citizen implies a significant transformation in the ‘ought to be’ of that citizen. If citizens are deemed capable of understanding and transforming their environment, they are thereby responsible for ensuring their own well-being and equipping themselves with the necessary skills to adapt to economic change, transforming them into “neoliberal subjects” within a Foucauldian framework. This new normativity appears to naturalise the functioning of social and economic structures and their dynamics, resulting in an undialectical analysis of social realities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alba Talón Villacañas, 2024. "The Being and the Ought to Be of Citizenship in European Social Innovation Discourse," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:552-:d:1500255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/10/552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/10/552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edwards-Schachter, Mónica & Wallace, Matthew L., 2017. "‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    3. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    5. Camaren Peter, 2021. "Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Developmental Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Economic Ecosystems and the Entrepreneurial State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Igor Calzada, 2021. "The Right to Have Digital Rights in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira, 2021. "Social Innovation for a Just Sustainable Development: Integrating the Wellbeing of Future People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Rogelja, T. & Ludvig, A. & Weiss, G. & Secco, L., 2018. "Implications of policy framework conditions for the development of forestry-based social innovation initiatives in Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 147-155.
    9. Marletto, Gerardo & Sillig, Cécile, 2019. "Lost in Mainstreaming? Agrifood and Urban Mobility Grassroots Innovations with Multiple Pathways and Outcomes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 88-100.
    10. Cui Huang & Chao Yang & Jun Su, 2018. "Policy change analysis based on “policy target–policy instrument” patterns: a case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1081-1114, November.
    11. Lu, Xiaowei & Wang, Jiexiang, 2024. "Is innovation strategy a catalyst to solve social problems? The impact of R&D and non-R&D innovation strategies on the performance of social innovation-oriented firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Tjörnbo, Ola & McGowan, Katharine, 2022. "A complex-systems perspective on the role of universities in social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Cristina Puente & María Eugenia Fabra & Cindy Mason & Cristina Puente-Rueda & Maria Ana Sáenz-Nuño & Ramiro Viñuales, 2021. "Role of the Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Luisa De Vita, 2023. "Women’s Tailored Food Delivery Platform: The Case of a Small Company in Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Soni, Gunjan & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Singh, Pallavi & Dey, Bidit L. & Dora, Manoj, 2021. "Technological interventions in social business: Mapping current research and establishing future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Elisabeth Eppinger, 2021. "How Open Innovation Practices Deliver Societal Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Arocena, Rodrigo & Sutz, Judith, 2021. "Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Kleba, John Bernhard & Reina-Rozo, Juan David, 2021. "Fostering peace engineering and rethinking development: A Latin American view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Mohsen Nazari & Iman Mostashar Nezami & Ali Asgary, 2024. "Mapping social innovation impact evaluation: a comprehensive literature review and prospects for future research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4505-4532, October.
    20. Piotr Weryński & Dorota Dolińska-Weryńska, 2021. "Agency Barriers of the Members of Silesian Senior NGOs in the Implementation of Social Innovation (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:552-:d:1500255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.