IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i4p252-d1128774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Ability, Work-Related Health, and Effort–Reward Imbalance: A Cross-Sectional Study among University Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Chamnong Thanapop

    (Master of Public Health Programme, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Research Centre of Data Science for Health Science, Walailak University, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Sasina Jit-akson

    (Master of Public Health Programme, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Dusanee Suwankhong

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Thaksin University, Phattalung 93210, Thailand)

  • Irniza Rasdi

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia)

  • Warangkana Chankong

    (Department of Health Sciences, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand)

  • Sasithorn Thanapop

    (Master of Public Health Programme, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Research Centre of Data Science for Health Science, Walailak University, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, university policies and public health measures resulted in university staff facing hazardous work environments and psychological health problems. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the association between sociodemographic characteristics, health conditions, work-related health, effort and reward imbalance (ERI), and work ability among university staff in southern Thailand. Data were collected using stratified random sampling of 381 participants between April and September 2022. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between the variables. The majority of the participants were female (63.5%) and aged below 45 years old (52%). Nearly 70% of the participants reported the absence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), while half of them were overweight, and 54.9% had an effort–reward ratio (ERR) greater than one. Most participants reported good-to-excellent work ability (82.4%). The probability of having poor-to-moderate work ability was higher among staff working from home (adj. OR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.6), those with NCDs (adj. OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0, 6.4), those who followed poor health behaviors (adj. OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.4, 4.9), and those who had an ERR greater than one (adj. OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.5, 5.6). In conclusion, the majority of university staff in southern Thailand had good-to-excellent work ability. Work ability was associated with the presence of NCDs, poor health behavior, working from home, and ERI. Therefore, universities should create suitable occupational health programs and resources to mitigate the negative effects of work conditions, including ERI, and promote healthy behaviors for their staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and future disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Chamnong Thanapop & Sasina Jit-akson & Dusanee Suwankhong & Irniza Rasdi & Warangkana Chankong & Sasithorn Thanapop, 2023. "Work Ability, Work-Related Health, and Effort–Reward Imbalance: A Cross-Sectional Study among University Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:252-:d:1128774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Bethge & Friedrich Radoschewski, 2012. "Adverse effects of effort–reward imbalance on work ability: longitudinal findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(5), pages 797-805, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie Ebener & Hans Martin Hasselhorn, 2019. "Validation of Short Measures of Work Ability for Research and Employee Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Petr Hlaďo & Jaroslava Dosedlová & Klára Harvánková & Petr Novotný & Jaroslav Gottfried & Karel Rečka & Markéta Petrovová & Bohumil Pokorný & Ilona Štorová, 2020. "Work Ability among Upper-Secondary School Teachers: Examining the Role of Burnout, Sense of Coherence, and Work-Related and Lifestyle Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Katja Spanier & Elliot Michel & Elke Peters & Friedrich Michael Radoschewski & Matthias Bethge, 2018. "Injustice at work affects work ability and role functioning: findings of a cohort study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(4), pages 447-456, May.
    4. Brussig Martin & Karačić Anemari & Kraetsch Clemens & Zapfel Stefan, 2021. "Handlungsansätze in Modellprojekten des Bundesprogramms „Innovative Wege zur Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben – rehapro“: Eine Inhaltsanalyse der Anträge bewilligter Projekte," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 30(1), pages 21-42, March.
    5. Pernille Frederiksen & Aage Indahl & Lars L Andersen & Kim Burton & Rasmus Hertzum-Larsen & Tom Bendix, 2017. "Can group-based reassuring information alter low back pain behavior? A cluster-randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:252-:d:1128774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.