IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i3p173-d1096748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Votes of People with Short Life Expectancy from Being a Long-Term Burden to Their Country

Author

Listed:
  • Ognjen Arandjelović

    (North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SX, UK)

Abstract

In response to the growing social discontent regarding what is perceived as generational injustice, due to younger generations of voters facing long-term negative consequences from issues disproportionately decided by the votes of older generations of voters, there have been suggestions to introduce an upper age voting threshold. These have been all but universally dismissed as offensive and contrary to basic democratic values. In the present article, I show that the idea is in fact entirely consonant with present-day democratic practices and far from without a precedent. Hence, I describe how the aforementioned generational injustice can be rectified using a simple vote-weighting scheme which is easy to implement and interpret. Lastly, I discuss the societal effects that this alteration of the voting system would have on the distribution of the origins of political power.

Suggested Citation

  • Ognjen Arandjelović, 2023. "A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Votes of People with Short Life Expectancy from Being a Long-Term Burden to Their Country," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:173-:d:1096748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/3/173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/3/173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, Matthew H. & Svolik, Milan W., 2020. "Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 392-409, May.
    2. Keith Jakee & Guang-Zhen Sun, 2006. "Is compulsory voting more democratic?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 61-75, October.
    3. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 327-328, September.
    4. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-2, March.
    5. Lever, Annabelle, 2010. "Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(4), pages 897-915, October.
    6. Jessica Sullivan & Scott A. Wolla, 2017. "Education, Income, and Wealth," Page One Economics Newsletter, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, pages 1-1, January.
    7. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 141-143, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arandjelović, Ognjen, 2023. "A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Votes of People with Short Life Expectancy From Being a Long-Term Burden to Their Country," SocArXiv qkg4f, Center for Open Science.
    2. Marcel Broersma & Scott A. Eldridge II, 2019. "Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 193-197.
    3. Scott A. Eldridge II & Lucía García-Carretero & Marcel Broersma, 2019. "Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 271-285.
    4. Chloé Cherrier & Robert Courtois & Emmanuel Rusch & Catherine Potard, 2023. "Dysfunctional Attitudes, Sociotropy–Autonomy, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in Emerging Adulthood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Jenelle Rouse & Amelia Palmer & Amy Parsons, 2023. "Reconstruct(ing) a Hidden History: Black Deaf Canadian Relat(ing) Identity," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Xin Fang & Yun Cao, 2023. "Spatial Association Network Evolution and Variance Decomposition of Economic Sustainability Development Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Toshkov, Dimiter & Brummel, Lars & Carroll, Brendan & Yesilkagit, Kutsal, 2024. "Public Policy Attitudes and Political Polarization in the Netherlands," OSF Preprints bz6n9, Center for Open Science.
    8. Voelkel, Jan G. & Stagnaro, Michael & Chu, James & Pink, Sophia Lerner & Mernyk, Joseph S. & Redekopp, Chrystal & Ghezae, Isaias & Cashman, Matthew & Adjodah, Dhaval & Allen, Levi, 2023. "Megastudy identifying effective interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes," OSF Preprints y79u5, Center for Open Science.
    9. Marcella Alsan & Luca Braghieri & Sarah Eichmeyer & Minjeong Joyce Kim & Stefanie Stantcheva & David Y. Yang, 2023. "Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 389-421, October.
    10. Robert Mickey, 2022. "Challenges to Subnational Democracy in the United States, Past and Present," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 118-129, January.
    11. Mutascu, Mihai, 2011. "Compulsory voting and tax revenues," MPRA Paper 33987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 029, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    13. Hartmann, Felix & Humphreys, Macartan & Geissler, Ferdinand & Klüver, Heike & Giesecke, Johannes, 2023. "Trading Liberties: Estimating COVID-19 Policy Preferences from Conjoint Data," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue First Vie, pages 1-9.
    14. James N. Druckman & Donald P. Green & Shanto Iyengar, 2023. "Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 708(1), pages 137-163, July.
    15. Brummel, Lars & Toshkov, Dimiter, 2024. "When Should Governments Listen to Social Protests? The Effects of Public Support and Outcome Favorability," OSF Preprints neh5u, Center for Open Science.
    16. Gabriele Gratton & Barton E Lee, 2024. "Liberty, Security, and Accountability: The Rise and Fall of Illiberal Democracies," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(1), pages 340-371.
    17. Geoffrey Layman & Frances Lee & Christina Wolbrecht, 2023. "Political Parties and Loser’s Consent in American Politics," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 708(1), pages 164-183, July.
    18. Al Mamun (a) and MD. Arfanuzzaman (b), 2020. "The Effects of Human Capital and Social Factors on the Household Income of Bangladesh: An Econometric Analysis," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 29-49, September.
    19. Gilad, Sharon & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan & Levi-Faur, David, 2024. "Partisan Alignment and the Propensity to Choose a Job in a Government Ministry," SocArXiv ufzcj, Center for Open Science.
    20. Michael Kurschilgen, 2023. "Moral awareness polarizes people’s fairness judgments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 339-364, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:173-:d:1096748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.