IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i1p47-d1036192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech Innovation in Social Service Provision: A Bibliometric Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Munodei

    (Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

  • Athenia Bongani Sibindi

    (Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

Abstract

The employment of fintech as a product and service distribution mechanism in various sectors has been widely adopted for the provision of seamless services. The adoption of fintech by both individuals and organisations avails more convenience in product and service provision. The combination of fintech and social protection service provision has been receiving increased attention, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic era. This paper sought to investigate and show the importance of fintech in social protection research. The study aims to show the evolutionary idea of fintech in social protection to elucidate how much research has been done and elucidate the emerging areas surrounding fintech in social protection. A review of the literature that links social protection provision and fintech was conducted to establish whether more research is needed in integrating fintech with social protection provision. This study employed a bibliometric review to explore linkages that exist between financial technology (fintech) and social protection provision to establish whether the area needs further research. Data were sourced from the SCOPUS database using the Boolean search approach with the use of keywords and filters. Search results were processed and analysed in both SCOPUS and VOSviewer for visual and network positioning. The findings of the study show that fintech and social protection have received increased attention, as shown by the number of publications since 2018. Details of the most influential authors, documents, countries, and sources were documented. The results indicate the following emerging research themes: (1) the adoption of fintech in social protection service provision; (2) blockchain technology research on social protection, (3) fintech in health care service provision combined with health insurance; and (4) fintech as a cushion against the impacts of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Munodei & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2023. "Fintech Innovation in Social Service Provision: A Bibliometric Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:47-:d:1036192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feyza G. Sahinyazan & Marie‐Ève Rancourt & Vedat Verter, 2021. "Food Aid Modality Selection Problem," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 965-983, April.
    2. Thomas Philippon, 2016. "The FinTech Opportunity," NBER Working Papers 22476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Laura Mann & Gianluca Iazzolino, 2021. "From Development State to Corporate Leviathan: Historicizing the Infrastructural Performativity of Digital Platforms within Kenyan Agriculture," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(4), pages 829-854, July.
    4. Sudeepa Khanal & Lira Ramadani & Melanie Boeckmann, 2022. "Health Equity in Climate Change Policies and Public Health Policies Related to Climate Change: Protocol for a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Christopher L. Tucci & Henry Chesbrough & Frank Piller & Joel West, 2016. "When do firms undertake open, collaborative activities? Introduction to the special section on open innovation and open business models," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(2), pages 283-288.
    6. Jon Frost, 2020. "The economic forces driving FinTech adoption across countries," Working Papers 663, DNB.
    7. Adegbite, Olayinka O. & Machethe, Charles L., 2020. "Bridging the financial inclusion gender gap in smallholder agriculture in Nigeria: An untapped potential for sustainable development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Mann, Laura & Iazzolino, Gianluca, 2021. "From development state to corporate leviathan: historicizing the infrastructural performativity of digital platforms within Kenyan agriculture," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110725, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Witness Chikoko & Kudzai Nyabeze & Kwashirai Zvokuomba & Kudzai Mwapaura & Samson Mhizha, 2021. "The Harmonized Social Cash Transfer Program in Zimbabwe: Achievements and Challenges," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 13(5), pages 12-21.
    10. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    11. Bastien David, 2021. "Non-financial reporting and climate change," Post-Print hal-03219991, HAL.
    12. João Paulo Coelho Ribeiro & Fábio Duarte & Ana Paula Matias Gama, 2022. "Does microfinance foster the development of its clients? A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Celso Brunetti & Benjamin Dennis & Dylan Gates & Diana Hancock & David Ignell & Elizabeth K. Kiser & Gurubala Kotta & Anna Kovner & Richard J. Rosen & Nicholas K. Tabor, 2021. "Climate Change and Financial Stability," FEDS Notes 2021-03-19-3, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    14. Constant, Labintan Adeniyi, 2011. "Climate Change And Poverty Reduction In Sahel: Climate Risk Management Contribution To Poverty Reduction," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 100537, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi, Yu & Dong, Xiaohong & Zhang, Qiyuan & Zhou, Ze, 2024. "FinTech, urban entrepreneurial activity, and social security levels: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Trotta, Annarita & Rania, Francesco & Strano, Eugenia, 2024. "Exploring the linkages between FinTech and ESG: A bibliometric perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. MAHFUZAH AHMAD & Nurul Ezhawati Abdul Latif & Faizal Mohamed Yusof & Salina Mad & Maizura Meor Zawawi, 2024. "Trends in Digital and Critical Thinking Skills Research in Millennials Accountant Profession: A Bibliometric Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 316-328.
    4. Cordery, Carolyn J. & Goncharenko, Galina & Polzer, Tobias & McConville, Danielle & Belal, Ataur, 2023. "NGOs’ performance, governance, and accountability in the era of digital transformation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Gambacorta, Romina, 2022. "On the nexus between wealth inequality, financial development and financial technology," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 429-451.
    2. PINSHI, Christian P., 2021. "Exploring the usefulness of Fintech in the dark era of COVID-19," MPRA Paper 107863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Cecchetti, Stephen & Schoenholtz, Kermit L., 2020. "Finance and Technology: What is changing and what is not," CEPR Discussion Papers 15352, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Fu, Jonathan & Mishra, Mrinal, 2022. "Fintech in the time of COVID−19: Technological adoption during crises," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Treu, Johannes, 2022. "FinTech, General Purpose Technology und Wohlfahrt," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 5 (Juni 2022), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    6. Goodell, John W. & Oriani, Marco Ercole & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Patel, Ritesh, 2023. "The importance of ABS 2 journals in finance scholarship: Evidence from a bibliometric case study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    7. Azmat, Fara & Lim, Weng Marc & Moyeen, Abdul & Voola, Ranjit & Gupta, Girish, 2023. "Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Bo Li & Zeshui Xu, 2021. "Insights into financial technology (FinTech): a bibliometric and visual study," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Eccles, Peter & Grout, Paul & Siciliani, Paolo & Zalewska, Anna, 2021. "The impact of machine learning and big data on credit markets," Bank of England working papers 930, Bank of England.
    10. Jiao, Zhilun & Shahid, Muhammad Shehryar & Mirza, Nawazish & Tan, Zhixiong, 2021. "Should the fourth industrial revolution be widespread or confined geographically? A country-level analysis of fintech economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Polasik, Michał & Huterska, Agnieszka & Iftikhar, Rehan & Mikula, Štěpán, 2020. "The impact of Payment Services Directive 2 on the PayTech sector development in Europe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 385-401.
    12. Neeraj Singh & Kushankur Dey, 2023. "A typology of agricultural market information systems and its dimensions: Case studies of digital platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Lucas A. Mariani & Jose Renato Haas Ornelas & Bernardo Ricca, 2023. "Banks’ Physical Footprint and Financial Technology Adoption," Working Papers Series 576, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    14. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    15. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    16. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    18. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    19. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:47-:d:1036192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.