IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i4p143-d776443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Experiences of the Menopause for Women in Zimbabwe and South Africa: Co-Producing an Information Resource

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Drew

    (Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Keabetswe Khutsoane

    (South African Medical Research Council/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nyasha Buwu

    (Biomedical Training and Research Institute, Harare P.O. Box CY 1753, Zimbabwe)

  • Celia L. Gregson

    (Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
    South African Medical Research Council/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

  • Lisa K. Micklesfield

    (South African Medical Research Council/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

  • Rashida A. Ferrand

    (Biomedical Training and Research Institute, Harare P.O. Box CY 1753, Zimbabwe
    Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Rachael Gooberman-Hill

    (Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK)

Abstract

Women in sub-Saharan Africa report multiple impacts of menopause on daily life and have requested further information to support themselves. This study co-produced contextually relevant resources—booklets and poster—about menopause with women in Zimbabwe and South Africa. The study was conducted in four stages: interviews with women about the menopause; the development of prototype information resources; workshops with women to discuss country-specific resources; and the refinement of resources. During the interviews, women explained that they had not received or accessed much information about the menopause and thought the physical and psychological issues associated with the menopause had to be “endured”. Prototype information resources comprised booklets and a poster with contextually relevant images and information. Workshop participants suggested several changes, including the addition of more diverse images and further information about treatments. The resources were refined, translated into several African languages, and endorsed by the Ministry of Health in Zimbabwe and the South African Menopause Society in South Africa. Women will be able to access resources through healthcare clinics, community groups and churches. Working with women and other stakeholders enabled a development that was cognisant of experiences and needs. Work is now needed to improve access to treatments and support for menopause to reduce health inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Drew & Keabetswe Khutsoane & Nyasha Buwu & Celia L. Gregson & Lisa K. Micklesfield & Rashida A. Ferrand & Rachael Gooberman-Hill, 2022. "Improving Experiences of the Menopause for Women in Zimbabwe and South Africa: Co-Producing an Information Resource," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:143-:d:776443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/4/143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/4/143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asha S George & Vrinda Mehra & Kerry Scott & Veena Sriram, 2015. "Community Participation in Health Systems Research: A Systematic Review Assessing the State of Research, the Nature of Interventions Involved and the Features of Engagement with Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Alford, 2014. "The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 299-316, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carina Dantas & Juliana Louceiro & Joana Vieira & Willeke van Staalduinen & Oscar Zanutto & Karolina Mackiewicz, 2022. "SHAFE Mapping on Social Innovation Ecosystems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    3. Kim, Hyerang & Shon, Soonyoung & Shin, Hyunsook, 2020. "Exploring the unmet needs for creating an enabling environment for nurturing care to promote migrant child health in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: A theory-guided community-based participatory action research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Ghouwa Ismail & Ashley Van Niekerk, 2021. "Validation of an Assessment Tool to Measure Psycho-Social Factors Associated With Willingness to Participate in Child-Centered Initiatives," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    5. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public service innovation networks (PSINs): an instrument for collaborative innovation and value co-creation in public service(s)," Working Papers halshs-01934284, HAL.
    8. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Paloma Díaz & John M. Carroll & Ignacio Aedo, 2016. "Coproduction as an Approach to Technology-Mediated Citizen Participation in Emergency Management," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Seye Abimbola & Dorothy Drabarek & Shola K. Molemodile, 2022. "Self‐reliance or social accountability? The raison d'être of community health committees in Nigeria," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1722-1735, May.
    11. Tremblay, Melissa & Gokiert, Rebecca & Kingsley, Bethan & Mottershead, Karen & Pei, Jacqueline, 2020. "Using developmental evaluation and community-based participatory research to develop a model of supportive housing," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Beatriz Vallina Acha & Estrella Durá Ferrandis & Mireia Ferri Sanz & Maite Ferrando García, 2021. "Engaging People and Co-Producing Research with Persons and Communities to Foster Person-Centred Care: A Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Marco Bellandi, 2021. "Factors Supporting or Hindering the Place-based Structure of Commons in Local Productive Systems," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 8, pages 1-14.
    15. Luisi, Daniela & Hämel, Kerstin, 2021. "Community participation and empowerment in primary health care in Emilia-Romagna: A document analysis study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 177-184.
    16. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Dionisio, Marcelo & de Vargas, Eduardo Raupp, 2022. "Integrating Corporate Social Innovations and cross-collaboration: An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 794-803.
    18. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
    19. Sarr, Sait & Hayes, Bunny & DeCaro, Daniel A., 2021. "Applying Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework, and design principles for co-production to pollution management in Louisville's Rubbertown, Kentucky," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "How Practices of Managing Partnerships Contributes to the Value Creation—Public–Social Partnership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:143-:d:776443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.