IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i12p576-d997534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migrant Organizations and Social Protection in Germany: The Functions of MOs for Their Target Groups’ Social Protection Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Bonfert

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Technical University Dortmund, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Eva Günzel

    (Chair of Sociology/Urban and Regional Studies, Faculty of Social Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Ariana Kellmer

    (Institute for Work, Skills and Training, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany)

Abstract

This article engages with the functions assumed by migrant organizations (MOs) in Germany in the context of the social protection of people with migration biographies. Based on document analyses and qualitative interviews with three groups of actors, we identify four functions through which MOs contribute to their target groups’ social protection practices, and show how diverging perceptions toward these functions shape the current role of MOs in a changing welfare system. In addition to providing social services themselves (service function), they mediate with the welfare system (hinging function) and advocate for the interests of people with migration biographies in public and political discourse (advocacy function). Moreover, we demonstrate that these functions are shaped and complemented by a “homemaking” function, a form of informal protection based on mutual support, trust and understanding. In this article, the discussion of the specific ways in which these functions play a role for the social protection of people with migration biographies is based on joint analysis of three data sets. Thus, we juxtapose the viewpoints of MO representatives, their target groups and people associated with welfare state institutions and political administrations. In this way, we show how MOs use these various functions to actively engage with a changing welfare landscape, whereas welfare institutions and political administrations often perceive of the work undertaken by MOs rather as an ‘integration’-oriented prerequisite for their own social service provision. As a result, contrasting and sometimes competing perspectives challenge the role of MOs within the German welfare system, even though these organizations already fulfill key functions for their target groups’ social protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Bonfert & Eva Günzel & Ariana Kellmer, 2022. "Migrant Organizations and Social Protection in Germany: The Functions of MOs for Their Target Groups’ Social Protection Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:576-:d:997534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/576/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Faist, 2017. "Transnational social protection in Europe: a social inequality perspective," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 20-32, January.
    2. Ester Serra Mingot & Valentina Mazzucato, 2017. "Mobile Populations in Immobile Welfare Systems: A Typology of Institutions Providing Social Welfare and Protection Within a Mobility Framework," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(4), pages 787-805, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Günzel & Matthias Benz & Sören Petermann, 2022. "Migrant Organizations and Their Networks in the Co-Production of Social Protection," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Scheibelhofer, 2022. "Migrants’ Experiences With Limited Access to Social Protection in a Framework of EU Post‐National Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 164-173.
    2. Yu Hao & Yujia Li & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading contribute to reducing infectious diseases? Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 74-100, March.
    3. Elisabeth Scheibelhofer & Clara Holzinger, 2018. "‘Damn It, I Am a Miserable Eastern European in the Eyes of the Administrator’: EU Migrants’ Experiences with (Transnational) Social Security," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 201-209.
    4. Jean-Michel Lafleur & Inci Öykü Yener‐Roderburg, 2022. "Emigration and the Transnationalization of Sending States’ Welfare Regimes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 174-183.
    5. Sanna Saksela-Bergholm, 2019. "Welfare beyond Borders: Filipino Transnational Families’ Informal Social Protection Strategies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 221-231.
    6. Bonfert, Lisa & Günzel, Eva & Kellmer, Ariana & Barglowski, Karolina & Klammer, Ute & Petermann, Sören & Pries, Ludger & Schlee, Thorsten, 2022. "Migrantenorganisationen und soziale Sicherung," IAQ-Report 2022-10, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ).
    7. Karolina Barglowski & Lisa Bonfert, 2022. "The Affective Dimension of Social Protection: A Case Study of Migrant-Led Organizations and Associations in Germany," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Koen Voorend & Daniel Alvarado, 2023. "Barriers to Healthcare Access for Immigrants in Costa Rica and Uruguay," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 747-771, June.
    9. Elisabeth Scheibelhofer, 2022. "Transnational Social Protection: Inclusion for Whom? Theoretical Reflections and Migrant Experiences," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 161-163.
    10. Ratzmann, Nora, 2020. "EU migrants' experiences of claims-making in German job centres," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104678, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:576-:d:997534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.