IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/104678.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU migrants' experiences of claims-making in German job centres

Author

Listed:
  • Ratzmann, Nora

Abstract

The paper describes intra-EU migrants’ experiences with (transnational) social security in Germany, showcasing their sense-making of the claims-making process to basic subsistence benefits in local job centres. The analysis of 48 qualitative interviews with intra- EU migrants and key informants illustrates how they are not merely passive recipients but may actively assert their rights, based on their degree of familiarity with German welfare bureaucracy, their pre-existing welfare expectations, and their available cultural and social capital. Whether EU migrant citizens decide to claim relates to their cost-benefit analyses on the accessibility to benefits and to alternative means of support, as well as their perceived social legitimacy to draw on German public social support. As a general trend, EU citizens first tried to exhaust all other means of generating an income, seeking to remain financially independent from state-provided welfare, before seeking to claim social assistance-type benefits as a last resort. The data also shows how some applicants are less able than others to pay the hidden costs imposed onto them during the claiming process. The paper finally highlights how, in the light of the inequalities of access they face, intra-EU migrants have developed a variety of strategies to satisfy their social protection needs, relying on a mix of formal and informal welfare arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratzmann, Nora, 2020. "EU migrants' experiences of claims-making in German job centres," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104678, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:104678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104678/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ester Serra Mingot & Valentina Mazzucato, 2017. "Mobile Populations in Immobile Welfare Systems: A Typology of Institutions Providing Social Welfare and Protection Within a Mobility Framework," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(4), pages 787-805, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Michel Lafleur & Inci Öykü Yener‐Roderburg, 2022. "Emigration and the Transnationalization of Sending States’ Welfare Regimes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 174-183.
    2. Lisa Bonfert & Eva Günzel & Ariana Kellmer, 2022. "Migrant Organizations and Social Protection in Germany: The Functions of MOs for Their Target Groups’ Social Protection Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Bonfert, Lisa & Günzel, Eva & Kellmer, Ariana & Barglowski, Karolina & Klammer, Ute & Petermann, Sören & Pries, Ludger & Schlee, Thorsten, 2022. "Migrantenorganisationen und soziale Sicherung," IAQ-Report 2022-10, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    policy implementation; EU migration; social security administration; activist citizenship; welfare magnet hypothesis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:104678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.