IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i2p32-d490781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the BIS Capital Adequacy Ratio for Korean Banks Using Machine Learning: Predicting by Variable Selection Using Random Forest Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jaewon Park

    (Division of Management Information System, College of Business Administration, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Minsoo Shin

    (Division of Management Information System, College of Business Administration, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Wookjae Heo

    (Department of Consumer Sciences, College of Education and Human Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find the most important variables that represent the future projections of the Bank of International Settlements’ (BIS) capital adequacy ratio, which is the index of financial soundness in a bank as a comprehensive and important measure of capital adequacy. This study analyzed the past 12 years of data from all domestic banks in South Korea. The research data include all financial information, such as key operating indicators, major business activities, and general information of the financial supervisory service of South Korea from 2008 to 2019. In this study, machine learning techniques, Random Forest Boruta algorithms, Random Forest Recursive Feature Elimination, and Bayesian Regularization Neural Networks (BRNN) were utilized. Among 1929 variables, this study found 38 most important variables for representing the BIS capital adequacy ratio. An additional comparison was executed to confirm the statistical validity of future prediction performance between BRNN and ordinary least squares (OLS) models. BRNN predicted the BIS capital adequacy ratio more robustly and accurately than the OLS models. We believe our findings would appeal to the readership of your journal such as the policymakers, managers and practitioners in the bank-related fields because this study highlights the key findings from the data-driven approaches using machine learning techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaewon Park & Minsoo Shin & Wookjae Heo, 2021. "Estimating the BIS Capital Adequacy Ratio for Korean Banks Using Machine Learning: Predicting by Variable Selection Using Random Forest Algorithms," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:32-:d:490781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/2/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/2/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R., 2010. "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i11).
    2. Eduard Sariev & Guido Germano, 2020. "Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks for the estimation of the probability of default," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 311-328, February.
    3. Anastasios Petropoulos & Vasilis Siakoulis & Evaggelos Stavroulakis & Aristotelis Klamargias, 2019. "A robust machine learning approach for credit risk analysis of large loan level datasets using deep learning and extreme gradient boosting," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Are post-crisis statistical initiatives completed?, volume 49, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Gambacorta, Leonardo & Huang, Yiping & Qiu, Han & Wang, Jingyi, 2024. "How do machine learning and non-traditional data affect credit scoring? New evidence from a Chinese fintech firm," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Heo, Wookjae & Lee, Jae Min & Park, Narang & Grable, John E., 2020. "Using Artificial Neural Network techniques to improve the description and prediction of household financial ratios," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    6. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B., 2006. "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 679-688.
    7. Anastasios Petropoulos & Vasilis Siakoulis & Evaggelos Stavroulakis & Aristotelis Klamargias, 2019. "A robust machine learning approach for credit risk analysis of large loan-level datasets using deep learning and extreme gradient boosting," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), The use of big data analytics and artificial intelligence in central banking, volume 50, Bank for International Settlements.
    8. Majid Bazarbash, 2019. "FinTech in Financial Inclusion: Machine Learning Applications in Assessing Credit Risk," IMF Working Papers 2019/109, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Wookjae Heo, 2020. "The Demand for Life Insurance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-36903-3, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Alonso Robisco & José Manuel Carbó Martínez, 2022. "Measuring the model risk-adjusted performance of machine learning algorithms in credit default prediction," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Roy Cerqueti & Francesca Pampurini & Annagiulia Pezzola & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2022. "Dangerous liasons and hot customers for banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 65-89, July.
    3. Fiorella De Fiore & Leonardo Gambacorta & Cristina Manea, 2023. "Big techs and the credit channel of monetary policy," BIS Working Papers 1088, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Onder Ozgur & Erdal Tanas Karagol & Fatih Cemil Ozbugday, 2021. "Machine learning approach to drivers of bank lending: evidence from an emerging economy," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Huang, Yiping & Li, Zhenhua & Qiu, Han & Tao, Sun & Wang, Xue & Zhang, Longmei, 2023. "BigTech credit risk assessment for SMEs," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. García-Céspedes, Rubén & Moreno, Manuel, 2022. "The generalized Vasicek credit risk model: A Machine Learning approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    7. Lisa Crosato & Caterina Liberati & Marco Repetto, 2021. "Look Who's Talking: Interpretable Machine Learning for Assessing Italian SMEs Credit Default," Papers 2108.13914, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    8. Jaewon Park & Minsoo Shin, 2022. "An Approach for Variable Selection and Prediction Model for Estimating the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Apostolos Ampountolas & Titus Nyarko Nde & Paresh Date & Corina Constantinescu, 2021. "A Machine Learning Approach for Micro-Credit Scoring," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Jagjit S. Chadha & Richard Barwell, 2019. "Renewing our Monetary Vows: Open Letters to the Governor of the Bank of England," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Occasional Papers 58, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    11. A. R. Provenzano & D. Trifir`o & A. Datteo & L. Giada & N. Jean & A. Riciputi & G. Le Pera & M. Spadaccino & L. Massaron & C. Nordio, 2020. "Machine Learning approach for Credit Scoring," Papers 2008.01687, arXiv.org.
    12. Heo, Wookjae & Lee, Jae Min & Park, Narang & Grable, John E., 2020. "Using Artificial Neural Network techniques to improve the description and prediction of household financial ratios," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    13. Andrés Alonso & José Manuel Carbó, 2021. "Understanding the performance of machine learning models to predict credit default: a novel approach for supervisory evaluation," Working Papers 2105, Banco de España.
    14. Alonso-Robisco, Andrés & Carbó, José Manuel, 2022. "Can machine learning models save capital for banks? Evidence from a Spanish credit portfolio," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Leonardo Gambacorta & Yiping Huang & Zhenhua Li & Han Qiu & Shu Chen, 2020. "Data vs collateral," BIS Working Papers 881, Bank for International Settlements.
    16. Cerqueti, Roy & Pampurini, Francesca & Quaranta, Anna Grazia & Storani, Saverio, 2024. "Risk transmission, systemic fragility of banks’ interacting customers and credit worthiness assessment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    17. Alraqeb Zeynep & Knaack Peter & Macaire Camille, 2022. "Does FinTech Promote Entrepreneurship? Evidence from China [L’adoption des Fintech favorise-t-elle l’entreprenariat ? Le cas de la Chine]," Working papers 895, Banque de France.
    18. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:id:572 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Tong, Jianfeng & Liu, Zhenxing & Zhang, Yong & Zheng, Xiujuan & Jin, Junyang, 2023. "Improved multi-gate mixture-of-experts framework for multi-step prediction of gas load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    20. Chang, Andrew C. & Hanson, Tyler J., 2016. "The accuracy of forecasts prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 23-43.
    21. Asma Shaheen & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:32-:d:490781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.