IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v7y2019i4p119-d296216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Valandis Elpidorou

    (Arch Reinsurance Europe Underwriting dac Ireland, Dublin 4, Ireland)

  • Carolin Margraf

    (Cass Business School, University of London, London EC1Y 8TZ, UK)

  • María Dolores Martínez-Miranda

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Bent Nielsen

    (Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1NF, UK)

Abstract

A new Bornhuetter–Ferguson method is suggested herein. This is a variant of the traditional chain ladder method. The actuary can adjust the relative ultimates using externally estimated relative ultimates. These correspond to linear constraints on the Poisson likelihood underpinning the chain ladder method. Adjusted cash flow estimates were obtained as constrained maximum likelihood estimates. The statistical derivation of the new method is provided in the generalised linear model framework. A related approach in the literature, combining unconstrained and constrained maximum likelihood estimates, is presented in the same framework and compared theoretically. A data illustration is described using a motor portfolio from a Greek insurer.

Suggested Citation

  • Valandis Elpidorou & Carolin Margraf & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Bent Nielsen, 2019. "A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:4:p:119-:d:296216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/4/119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/4/119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Gabrielli & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2018. "An Individual Claims History Simulation Machine," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-32, March.
    2. Heberle, Jochen & Thomas, Anne, 2016. "The fuzzy Bornhuetter–Ferguson method: an approach with fuzzy numbers," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 303-321, September.
    3. Mack, Thomas, 1991. "A Simple Parametric Model for Rating Automobile Insurance or Estimating IBNR Claims Reserves," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 93-109, April.
    4. Massimo De Felice & Franco Moriconi, 2019. "Claim Watching and Individual Claims Reserving Using Classification and Regression Trees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, October.
    5. Alai, D. H. & Merz, M. & Wüthrich, M. V., 2009. "Mean Square Error of Prediction in the Bornhuetter–Ferguson Claims Reserving Method," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 7-31, March.
    6. Maria Martínez-Miranda & Jens Nielsen & Richard Verrall, 2013. "Double Chain Ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 101-113.
    7. László Martinek, 2019. "Analysis of Stochastic Reserving Models By Means of NAIC Claims Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Nataliya Chukhrova & Arne Johannssen, 2017. "State Space Models and the K alman -Filter in Stochastic Claims Reserving: Forecasting, Filtering and Smoothing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-23, May.
    9. R. J. Verrall, 2004. "A Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method of Claims Reserving," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 67-89.
    10. Kevin Kuo, 2018. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Papers 1804.09253, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    11. Zoë Fannon & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Age-period cohort models," Economics Papers 2018-W04, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    12. Jonas Harnau & Bent Nielsen, 2018. "Over-Dispersed Age-Period-Cohort Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(524), pages 1722-1732, October.
    13. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    14. Renshaw, A.E. & Verrall, R.J., 1998. "A Stochastic Model Underlying the Chain-Ladder Technique," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 903-923, October.
    15. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen & J. P. Nielsen, 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Economics Papers 2009-W08, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    16. Bühlmann, Hans & Moriconi, Franco, 2015. "Credibility Claims Reserving With Stochastic Diagonal Effects," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 309-353, May.
    17. Kevin Kuo, 2019. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, September.
    18. De Vylder, F., 1982. "Estimation of IBNR claims by credibility theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 35-40, January.
    19. Kuang, D. & Nielsen, B. & Nielsen, J. P., 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 105-121, March.
    20. Mack, Thomas, 2000. "Credible Claims Reserves: the Benktander Method," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 333-347, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan M. Bischofberger, 2020. "In-Sample Hazard Forecasting Based on Survival Models with Operational Time," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
    3. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wang, Melantha & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "SynthETIC: An individual insurance claim simulator with feature control," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 296-308.
    5. Gao, Guangyuan & Meng, Shengwang & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 572-586.
    6. D Kuang & Bent Nielsen & J P Nielsen, 2013. "The Geometric Chain-Ladder," Economics Papers 2013-W11, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    7. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    8. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Generalized Log-Normal Chain-Ladder," Papers 1806.05939, arXiv.org.
    9. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    10. Benjamin Avanzi & Yanfeng Li & Bernard Wong & Alan Xian, 2022. "Ensemble distributional forecasting for insurance loss reserving," Papers 2206.08541, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    11. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Stochastic reserving with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2008.07564, arXiv.org.
    12. Di Kuang & Bent Nielsen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2011. "Forecasting in an Extended Chain‐Ladder‐Type Model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(2), pages 345-359, 06.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:4:p:119-:d:296216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.