IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i3p52-d1356521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling Outperformance: A Portfolio Analysis of Top AI-Related Stocks against IT Indices and Robotics ETFs

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Trabelsi Karoui

    (Laboratory BESTMOD, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia)

  • Sonia Sayari

    (College of Business Admiration and Finance, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wael Dammak

    (Institute of Financial and Insurance Sciences, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LSAF-EA2429, F-69007 Lyon, France)

  • Ahmed Jeribi

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Mahdia, University of Monastir, Monastir 5000, Tunisia)

Abstract

In this study, we delve into the financial market to compare the performance of prominent AI and robotics-related stocks against traditional IT indices, such as the Nasdaq, and specialized AI and robotics ETFs. We evaluate the role of these stocks in diversifying portfolios, analyzing their return potential and risk profiles. Our analysis includes various investment scenarios, focusing on common AI-related stocks in the United States. We explore the influence of risk management strategies, ranging from “buy and hold” to daily rebalancing, on AI stock portfolios. This involves investigating long-term strategies like buy and hold, as well as short-term approaches, such as daily rebalancing. Our findings, covering the period from 30 April 2021, to 15 September 2023, show that AI-related stocks have not only outperformed in recent years but also highlight the growing “AI bubble” and the increasing significance of AI in investment decisions. The study reveals that these stocks have delivered superior performance, as indicated by metrics like Sharpe and Treynor ratios, providing insights into market trends and financial returns in the technology and robotics sectors. The results are particularly relevant for investors and traders in the AI sector, offering a balanced view of potential returns against the risks in this rapidly evolving market. This paper adds to the financial market literature by demonstrating that investing in emerging trends, such as AI, can be more advantageous in the short term compared to traditional markets like the Nasdaq.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Trabelsi Karoui & Sonia Sayari & Wael Dammak & Ahmed Jeribi, 2024. "Unveiling Outperformance: A Portfolio Analysis of Top AI-Related Stocks against IT Indices and Robotics ETFs," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:52-:d:1356521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/3/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/3/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-35.
    2. An-Sing Chen & James Wuh Lin, 2014. "The relation between gold and stocks: an analysis of severe bear markets," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 158-170, February.
    3. Emmanuel Joel Aikins Abakah & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Chi‐Chuan Lee & Matthew Ntow‐Gyamfi, 2023. "Quantile price convergence and spillover effects among Bitcoin, Fintech, and artificial intelligence stocks," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 187-205, March.
    4. Yu, Jing-Rung & Lee, Wen-Yi, 2011. "Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 166-175, March.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    6. Fredj Jawadi & Nabila Jawadi & Duc Khuong Nguyen & Hassan Obeid, 2013. "Information technology sector and equity markets: an empirical investigation," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 729-737, May.
    7. Smales, L.A., 2019. "Bitcoin as a safe haven: Is it even worth considering?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 385-393.
    8. Dammak, Wael & Hamad, Salah Ben & de Peretti, Christian & Eleuch, Hichem, 2023. "Pricing of European currency options considering the dynamic information costs," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Ortas, Eduardo & Moneva, José M., 2013. "The Clean Techs equity indexes at stake: Risk and return dynamics analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 259-269.
    10. Philip Fei Wu & Jessica Vitak & Michael T. Zimmer, 2020. "A contextual approach to information privacy research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(4), pages 485-490, April.
    11. Wael Dammak & Salah Ben Hamad & Christian de Peretti & Hichem Eleuch, 2023. "Pricing of European currency options considering the dynamic information costs," Post-Print hal-04875463, HAL.
    12. Aurore J. Kamssu & Brian J. Reithel & Jennifer L. Ziegelmayer, 2003. "Information Technology and Financial Performance: The Impact of being an Internet-Dependent Firm on Stock Returns," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 279-288, September.
    13. Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2023. "ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Scott Willenbrock, 2011. "Diversification Return, Portfolio Rebalancing, and the Commodity Return Puzzle," Papers 1109.1256, arXiv.org.
    15. Scott Willenbrock, 2011. "Diversification Return, Portfolio Rebalancing, and the Commodity Return Puzzle," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 42-49, July.
    16. Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "FinTech Development and Regulatory Scrutiny: A Contradiction? The Case of Latvia," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huynh, Toan Luu Duc & Hille, Erik & Nasir, Muhammad Ali, 2020. "Diversification in the age of the 4th industrial revolution: The role of artificial intelligence, green bonds and cryptocurrencies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Le, TN-Lan & Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2021. "Time and frequency domain connectedness and spill-over among fintech, green bonds and cryptocurrencies in the age of the fourth industrial revolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Wang, Jiaxin & Zhao, Mu & Huang, Xiang & Song, Zilong & Sun, Di, 2024. "Supply chain diffusion mechanisms for AI applications: A perspective on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Zhou, Zhongsheng & Li, Zhuo & Du, Shanzhong & Cao, June, 2024. "Robot adoption and enterprise R&D manipulation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Li, Chengming & Huo, Peng & Wang, Zeyu & Zhang, Weiguang & Liang, Feiyan & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Digitalization generates equality? Enterprises’ digital transformation, financing constraints, and labor share in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Daxing Chen & Helian Xu & Guangya Zhou, 2024. "Has Artificial Intelligence Promoted Manufacturing Servitization: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Benoît Carmichael & Gilles Boevi Koumou & Kevin Moran, 2023. "Unifying Portfolio Diversification Measures Using Rao’s Quadratic Entropy," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(4), pages 769-802, December.
    8. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "To Trade Or Not To Trade: Cascading Waterfall Round Robin Rebalancing Mechanism for Cryptocurrencies," Papers 2407.12150, arXiv.org.
    9. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    10. Mao Wu & Ying Ma & Yu Gao & Zhanhui Ji, 2024. "The impact of digital economy on income inequality from the perspective of technological progress-biased transformation: evidence from China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 567-607, August.
    11. Wang, Linhui & Wang, Hui & Cao, Zhanglu & He, Yongda & Dong, Zhiqing & Wang, Shixiang, 2022. "Can industrial intellectualization reduce carbon emissions? — Empirical evidence from the perspective of carbon total factor productivity in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Alekseeva, Liudmila & Azar, José & Giné, Mireia & Samila, Sampsa & Taska, Bledi, 2021. "The demand for AI skills in the labor market," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Albanesi, Stefania & Dias da Silva, Antonio & Jimeno, Juan Francisco & Lamo, Ana & Wabitsch, Alena, 2023. "New Technologies and Jobs in Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 18220, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Levy, Moshe, 2024. "Does constant asset allocation dominate buy-and-hold?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    15. Ciaffi, Giovanna & Deleidi, Matteo & Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2024. "Stagnation despite ongoing innovation: Is R&D expenditure composition a missing link? An empirical analysis for the US (1948–2019)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Wang, Linhui & Cao, Zhanglu & Dong, Zhiqing, 2023. "Are artificial intelligence dividends evenly distributed between profits and wages? Evidence from the private enterprise survey data in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 342-356.
    17. Azar, José & Alekseeva, Liudmila & Gine, Mireia & Samila, Sampsa & Taska, Bledi, 2020. "The Demand for AI Skills in the Labor Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 14320, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions: A Systems Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Laura Abrardi & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 969-991, September.
    20. Lan, Sen & Cui, Maosheng, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation and employment: Spillover effect within supply chains," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:52-:d:1356521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.