IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i9p167-d895179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FinTech Development and Regulatory Scrutiny: A Contradiction? The Case of Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Rupeika-Apoga

    (Faculty of Business, Management and Economics, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Stefan Wendt

    (Department of Business, Bifröst University, 311 Borgarnes, Iceland)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine whether FinTech companies believe that the growing dependence on regulation represents a potential risk for their development. In 2021, we conducted a survey among Latvian FinTech companies to ascertain their attitude toward regulatory scrutiny. We received 31 responses, representing a 33% response rate. The responses show that regulation is still one of the most pressing issues for FinTech companies, even though it is not necessarily regulation per se that causes concerns, but the lack of a regulatory framework that would be suitable for the special situation of the FinTech sector. However, regulation is now regarded as less problematic than it was in a previous survey in 2019, when respondents saw regulation as the most pressing issue. Moreover, the FinTech industry anticipates better support from the regulator, such as more realistic sandbox approaches and a willingness to consider new business models. According to the survey responses, the UK, Estonian, and Lithuanian regulators can serve as inspiration in this regard. Latvian FinTech companies expect regulators to be more flexible and open in their communication. This study is intended to advance regulatory reform by aiding the understanding of the requirements of fast-evolving FinTech companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "FinTech Development and Regulatory Scrutiny: A Contradiction? The Case of Latvia," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:167-:d:895179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/9/167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/9/167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "Ideas for a Regulatory Definition of FinTech," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 136-154.
    2. Erik Feyen & Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Harish Natarajan & Matthew Saal, 2021. "Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: implications for market structure and public policy," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 117.
    3. Yue Ma & De Liu, 2017. "Introduction to the special issue on Crowdfunding and FinTech," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1-4, December.
    4. Syeda Hina Zaidi & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2021. "Liquidity Synchronization, Its Determinants and Outcomes under Economic Growth Volatility: Evidence from Emerging Asian Economies," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Andreas Oehler & Matthias Horn & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "Investor Characteristics and their Impact on the Decision to use a Robo-advisor," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 91-125, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Gaviyau & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2023. "Global Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Regulatory Framework: A Critique," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mukul Bhatnagar & Ercan Özen & Sanjay Taneja & Simon Grima & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2022. "The Dynamic Connectedness between Risk and Return in the Fintech Market of India: Evidence Using the GARCH-M Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Parminder Varma & Shivinder Nijjer & Kiran Sood & Simon Grima & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2022. "Thematic Analysis of Financial Technology (Fintech) Influence on the Banking Industry," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Sasidaran Gopalan & Bhavya Gupta & Ramkishen S. Rajan, 2023. "Financial globalisation in ASEAN+3: Navigating the financial trilemma," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 464-476, June.
    5. Jamil, Abd Rahim Md. & Law, Siong Hook & Mohamad Khair-Afham, M.S. & Trinugroho, Irwan, 2023. "Financial inclusion and economic uncertainty in developing countries: The role of digitalisation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 786-806.
    6. Izabela Bludnik, 2023. "Central Bank Digital Currency and the Cashless Economy:The African Experience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 314-324.
    7. Termeh Shafie & David Schoch, 2021. "Multiplexity analysis of networks using multigraph representations," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1425-1444, December.
    8. Sarah Bell & Jon Frost & Boris Hofmann & Damiano Sandri & Hyun Song Shin, 2024. "Central bank capital and trust in money: lessons from history for the digital age," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 146.
    9. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Felix Holzmeister & Martin Holmén & Michael Kirchler & Matthias Stefan & Erik Wengström, 2023. "Delegation Decisions in Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4828-4844, August.
    11. Florin GROSU, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Fintech Ecosystems in Romania and Estonia," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(5), pages 646-655, December.
    12. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:14:p:143-164 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Carla Martínez-Climent & Ana Zorio-Grima & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2018. "Financial return crowdfunding: literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 527-553, September.
    14. Damianos P. Sakas & Ioannis Dimitrios G. Kamperos & Dimitrios P. Reklitis & Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos & Marina C. Terzi & Nikos Kanellos, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Centralized Payment Network Advertisements on Digital Branding during the COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Fatkhurrohman, 2021. "Access to Fintech and Poverty : Evidence from the Arrival of 4G Networks in Indonesia," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 24, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    16. Sharina Tajul Urus & Intan Salwani Mohamed, 2021. "A Flourishing Fintech Ecosystem: Conceptualization and Governing Issues in Malaysia," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(3), pages 106-131, December.
    17. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2024. "Financial technology research: Past and future trajectories," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 162-181.
    18. Milena Vučinić & Radoica Luburić, 2022. "Fintech, Risk-Based Thinking and Cyber Risk," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 11(2), pages 27-53.
    19. Alexia GAUDEUL & Caterina GIANNETTI, 2023. "Trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Discussion Papers 2023/288, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Ricardo Costa-Climent & Carla Martínez-Climent, 2018. "Sustainable profitability of ethical and conventional banking," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    21. Berrin Arzu Eren, 2024. "Antecedents of robo-advisor use intention in private pension investments: an emerging market country example," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 683-698, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:167-:d:895179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.