IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i8p159-d879808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Segments by Perceived Project Risk and Their Characteristics Based on Primary Research Results

Author

Listed:
  • Mónika Garai-Fodor

    (Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Tibor Pál Szemere

    (Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir

    (Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Our research focuses on investment initiatives. The perceived risks are analysed from the consumer’s viewpoint, i.e., the client’s perspective, from the standpoint of the project. In the literature, there are several risk interpretations and classifications. We assumed it could be interesting and valuable to approach investment projects from a consumer-oriented viewpoint, considering that the perceived and consumer-identified set of risks is a major determinant of the outcome of a decision. In addition to relevant secondary sources, we also present partial results of our primary research project. A pre-tested, standardised online questionnaire was employed in the primary study, using a snowball sampling approach generating 1545 evaluable questionnaires. As a result of the research, we were able to segment the customer (investor) target groups into various categories depending on the perceived project risk. We have established the orientation directions along which these segments may well be meaningfully described in terms of perceived investment risk concerns and socio-demographic characteristics that influence cluster membership. In our opinion, the findings may be a useful source of information for investment project developers looking to identify consumer groups based on risk perception and build project solutions for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Mónika Garai-Fodor & Tibor Pál Szemere & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2022. "Investor Segments by Perceived Project Risk and Their Characteristics Based on Primary Research Results," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:159-:d:879808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/8/159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/8/159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shou Qing Wang & Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Muhammad Yousuf Aguria, 2004. "Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 237-252.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bálint Blaskovics & Zalán Márk Maró & Gábor Klimkó & Viktória Papp-Horváth & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2023. "Differences between Public-Sector and Private-Sector Project Management Practices in Hungary from a Competency Point of View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahsan Nawaz & Xing Su & Qaiser Mohi Ud Din & Muhammad Irslan Khalid & Muhammad Bilal & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, 2020. "Identification of the H&S (Health and Safety Factors) Involved in Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries-A Sequential Mixed Method Approach of OLMT-Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Akbari Ahmadabadi, Ali & Heravi, Gholamreza, 2019. "Risk assessment framework of PPP-megaprojects focusing on risk interaction and project success," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 169-188.
    3. Hande Aladağ, 2023. "Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT Use for Risk Management in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Anuja Shaktawat & Shelly Vadhera, 2021. "Risk management of hydropower projects for sustainable development: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 45-76, January.
    5. Edwin Thomas Banobi & Wooyong Jung, 2019. "Causes and Mitigation Strategies of Delay in Power Construction Projects: Gaps between Owners and Contractors in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Keonhyeong Lee & Liyuan Wang, 2023. "Chinese High-Tech Export Performance: Effects of Intellectual Capital Mediated by Dynamic and Risk Management Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    7. Gholamreza Dehdasht & Rosli Mohamad Zin & M. Salim Ferwati & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Ali Keyvanfar & Ronald McCaffer, 2017. "DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Jin Woo Won & Wooyong Jung & Seung Heon Han & Sungmin Yun & Bonsang Koo, 2019. "What Enables a High-Risk Project to Yield High Return from a Construction Contractor’s Perspective?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Aleksandar Senić & Momčilo Dobrodolac & Zoran Stojadinović, 2024. "Development of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Weddy Bernadi Sudirman & Sarwono Hardjomuljadi, 2011. "Project Risk Management in Hydropower Plant Projects," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 3(2), pages 171-186, December.
    11. Irem Dikmen & M. Talat Birgonul, 2006. "A review of international construction research: Ranko Bon's contribution," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 725-733.
    12. Ing.Jakub Blatak, 2016. "Potential of Using Design-Build in Public Procurement," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 77-85, August.
    13. Yin Chen & Mei Ye Kho & Othman Mohamed, 2024. "Developing a Conceptual Model for Promoting Risk Management for Public–Private Partnerships Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Palaco, Ileana & Park, Min Jae & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2019. "Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 205-218.
    15. Ahsan Nawaz & Ahsan Waqar & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah & Muhammad Sajid & Muhammad Irslan Khalid, 2019. "An Innovative Framework for Risk Management in Construction Projects in Developing Countries: Evidence from Pakistan," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, February.
    16. Mohamed, Emad & Seresht, Nima Gerami & Jafari, Parinaz & AbouRizk, Simaan, 2024. "Risk assessment for onshore wind projects in Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. A. Garcia-Bernabeu & F. Mayor-Vitoria & F. Mas-Verdu, 2015. "Project Finance Recent Applications and Future Trends: The State of the Art," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(2), pages 159-178, December.
    18. John Malu Nzioki & Dr. Mary Nyawira Mwenda, 2021. "Enhancing Performance of the Building Construction Industry through Quantitative Risk Analysis and Risk Response: A Case of Exchequer Funded Building Construction Projects in Machakos County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(3), pages 31-39, March.
    19. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    20. Agnieszka Leśniak & Filip Janowiec, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Additional Works in Railway Construction Investments Using the Bayes Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:159-:d:879808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.