IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i6p129-d841211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusion Approximations of the Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model Driven by a Renewal Process

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Burnecki

    (Hugo Steinhaus Center, Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Marek A. Teuerle

    (Hugo Steinhaus Center, Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Wilkowska

    (Hugo Steinhaus Center, Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

We introduce here a diffusion-type approximation of the ruin probability both in finite and infinite time for a two-dimensional risk process, where claims and premiums are shared with a predetermined proportion. This type of process is often called the insurer–reinsurer model. We assume that the flow of claims is governed by a general renewal process. A simple ruin probability formula for the model is known only in infinite time for the special case of the Poisson process and exponentially distributed claims. Therefore, there is a need for simple analytical approximations. In the literature, in the infinite-time case, for the Poisson process, a De Vylder-type approximation has already been introduced. The idea of the diffusion approximation presented here is based on the weak convergence of stochastic processes, which enables one to replace the original risk process with a Brownian motion with drift. By applying this idea to the insurer–reinsurer model, we obtain simple ruin probability approximations for both finite and infinite time. We check the usefulness of the approximations by studying several claim amount distributions and comparing the results with the De Vylder-type approximation and Monte Carlo simulations. All the results show that the proposed approximations are promising and often yield small relative errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek A. Teuerle & Aleksandra Wilkowska, 2022. "Diffusion Approximations of the Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model Driven by a Renewal Process," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:129-:d:841211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/6/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/6/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grandell, Jan, 2000. "Simple approximations of ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 157-173, May.
    2. Garrido, Jose, 1989. "Stochastic differential equations for compounded risk reserves," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 165-173, November.
    3. Harrison, J. Michael, 1977. "Ruin problems with compounding assets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 67-79, February.
    4. Abikhalil, F., 1986. "Finite Time Ruin Problems for Perturbed Experience Rating and Connection with Discounting Risk Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 33-43, April.
    5. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek A. Teuerle & Aleksandra Wilkowska, 2021. "Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model for Exponential Claims: A Probabilistic Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Bohman, H., 1972. "Risk theory and Wiener processes," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 96-99, December.
    7. Garrido, Jose, 1988. "Diffusion premiums for claim severities subject to inflation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 123-129, April.
    8. Grandell, Jan, 1972. "A remark on Wiener process approximation of risk processes," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 100-101, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Powers, Michael R., 1995. "A theory of risk, return and solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 101-118, October.
    2. Norberg, Ragnar, 1999. "Ruin problems with assets and liabilities of diffusion type," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 255-269, June.
    3. Yuen, Kam C. & Wang, Guojing & Ng, Kai W., 2004. "Ruin probabilities for a risk process with stochastic return on investments," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 259-274, April.
    4. Kostadinova, Radostina, 2007. "Optimal investment for insurers when the stock price follows an exponential Lévy process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 250-263, September.
    5. Luo, Shangzhen & Taksar, Michael, 2011. "On absolute ruin minimization under a diffusion approximation model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 123-133, January.
    6. Yacine Koucha & Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis, 2021. "Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation," Papers 2107.02537, arXiv.org.
    7. Bai, Long & Luo, Li, 2017. "Parisian ruin of the Brownian motion risk model with constant force of interest," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 34-44.
    8. Debicka, Joanna, 2003. "Moments of the cash value of future payment streams arising from life insurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 533-550, December.
    9. Kalashnikov, Vladimir & Norberg, Ragnar, 2002. "Power tailed ruin probabilities in the presence of risky investments," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 211-228, April.
    10. Paulsen, Jostein, 1998. "Ruin theory with compounding assets -- a survey," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-16, May.
    11. Covrig Mihaela & Serban Radu, 2008. "About Risk Process Estimation Techniques Employed By A Virtual Organization Which Is Directed Towards The Insurance Business," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 841-847, May.
    12. Bankovsky, Damien & Sly, Allan, 2009. "Exact conditions for no ruin for the generalised Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 2544-2562, August.
    13. David J. Santana & Juan González-Hernández & Luis Rincón, 2017. "Approximation of the Ultimate Ruin Probability in the Classical Risk Model Using Erlang Mixtures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-798, September.
    14. Yuchao Dong & J'er^ome Spielmann, 2019. "Weak Limits of Random Coefficient Autoregressive Processes and their Application in Ruin Theory," Papers 1907.01828, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    15. Ya Huang & Xiangqun Yang & Jieming Zhou, 2017. "Robust optimal investment and reinsurance problem for a general insurance company under Heston model," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(2), pages 305-326, April.
    16. Sundt, Bjorn & Teugels, Jozef L., 1995. "Ruin estimates under interest force," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 7-22, April.
    17. Nilsen, Trygve & Paulsen, Jostein, 1996. "On the distribution of a randomly discounted compound Poisson process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 305-310, February.
    18. Wang, Guojing & Wu, Rong, 2001. "Distributions for the risk process with a stochastic return on investments," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 329-341, October.
    19. Qianqian Zhou & Junyi Guo, 2020. "Optimal Control of Investment for an Insurer in Two Currency Markets," Papers 2006.02857, arXiv.org.
    20. Liqun Wang & Klaus Pötzelberger, 2007. "Crossing Probabilities for Diffusion Processes with Piecewise Continuous Boundaries," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 21-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:129-:d:841211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.