IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v8y2019i1p20-d198096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of 3D-Printing Technologies on the Transformation of Industrial Production in the Arctic Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Evgenii A. Konnikov

    (Graduate School of Economics and Technologies, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Olga A. Konnikova

    (Marketing Department, St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 191023 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Dmitriy G. Rodionov

    (Graduate School of Economics and Technologies, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Today the process of transition to a new technological order has become evident to everyone, especially in developed countries. One of the most urgent areas for ensuring the long-term competitiveness of industrial enterprises is the development of the Arctic zone. This region has many economic and logistical difficulties, the solution of which may lie in the use of advanced technologies of the new technological order, for example, 3D-printing technologies. The aim of the article is to study the transformation of the cost structure of industrial products as a result of integration of 3D-printing technologies into the production process of industrial enterprise operating in the Arctic zone. It was found that the structure of the main cost elements varies greatly, due to the ambiguity of replacing computer numerical control (CNC) (or other classical shaping technologies) with 3D-printing technologies, as well as the specifics of supply chains, which is quite urgent for the Arctic region. The results of empirical study necessitate the development of tools for predicting the economic viability of integrating 3D-printing technologies into the technological processes of industrial enterprises operating in the Arctic zone. Within the article, the authors substantiated and developed a fuzzy-multiple model for assessing the level of investment attractiveness of integration of 3D-printing technologies into the production process of an industrial enterprise operating the Arctic zone. One of the aims of this model is to answer the question of whether an enterprise should invest in a technological transition to 3D-printing technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenii A. Konnikov & Olga A. Konnikova & Dmitriy G. Rodionov, 2019. "Impact of 3D-Printing Technologies on the Transformation of Industrial Production in the Arctic Zone," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:20-:d:198096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi, 2018. "Future Trajectories of Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Erjavec, J. & Gradisar, M. & Trkman, P., 2012. "Assessment of stock size to minimize cutting stock production costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 170-176.
    3. Sirkka Koskela & Tuomas Mattila & Riina Antikainen & Ilmo Mäenpää, 2013. "Identifying Key Sectors and Measures for a Transition towards a Low Resource Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Verlinden, B. & Duflou, J.R. & Collin, P. & Cattrysse, D., 2008. "Cost estimation for sheet metal parts using multiple regression and artificial neural networks: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 484-492, February.
    5. Till Zimmermann & Stefan Gößling-Reisemann, 2014. "Recycling Potentials of Critical Metals-Analyzing Secondary Flows from Selected Applications," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Schniederjans, Dara G., 2017. "Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: A survey analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 287-298.
    7. Thomas-Seale, L.E.J. & Kirkman-Brown, J.C. & Attallah, M.M. & Espino, D.M. & Shepherd, D.E.T., 2018. "The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: Perspectives from UK industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 104-118.
    8. Mario Schmidt & Michiyasu Nakajima, 2013. "Material Flow Cost Accounting as an Approach to Improve Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Xiaowo, 2009. "Production costs, scope economies, and multi-client outsourcing under quantity competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 130-140, September.
    10. James L. Boutwell & John V. Westra, 2013. "Benefit Transfer: A Review of Methodologies and Challenges," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2017. "Proposal of a Sustainable Circular Index for Manufacturing Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2017. "Possible market entry of a firm with an additive manufacturing technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 190-199.
    13. Damien Giurco & Anna Littleboy & Thomas Boyle & Julian Fyfe & Stuart White, 2014. "Circular Economy: Questions for Responsible Minerals, Additive Manufacturing and Recycling of Metals," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Brent Jacobs & Louise Boronyak-Vasco & Kristy Moyle & Peat Leith, 2016. "Ensuring Resilience of Natural Resources under Exposure to Extreme Climate Events," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Mellor, Stephen & Hao, Liang & Zhang, David, 2014. "Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 194-201.
    16. Anna Scolobig & Johan Lilliestam, 2016. "Comparing Approaches for the Integration of Stakeholder Perspectives in Environmental Decision Making," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Larisa Rudneva & Irina Pchelintseva & Maria Gureva, 2018. "Scenario Modelling of the “Green” Economy in an Economic Space," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, April.
    18. E. Carina H. Keskitalo & Elias Andersson, 2017. "Why Organization May Be the Primary Limitation to Implementing Sustainability at the Local Level: Examples from Swedish Case Studies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Maria Serena Mancini & Mikel Evans & Katsunori Iha & Carla Danelutti & Alessandro Galli, 2018. "Assessing the Ecological Footprint of Ecotourism Packages: A Methodological Proposition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-37, June.
    20. Gebler, Malte & Schoot Uiterkamp, Anton J.M. & Visser, Cindy, 2014. "A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 158-167.
    21. Brittany Manley & Statia Elliot & Shoshanah Jacobs, 2017. "Expedition Cruising in the Canadian Arctic: Visitor Motives and the Influence of Education Programming on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, June.
    22. Kian, Ramez & Gürler, Ülkü & Berk, Emre, 2014. "The dynamic lot-sizing problem with convex economic production costs and setups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 361-379.
    23. Weller, Christian & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2015. "Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 43-56.
    24. Radharamanan, R., 1994. "Group technology concepts as applied to flexible manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-3), pages 133-142, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Chekurov, Sergei & Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini & Salmi, Mika & Roda, Irene & Jussila, Ari, 2018. "The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 87-97.
    3. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Naghshineh, Bardia & Ribeiro, André & Jacinto, Celeste & Carvalho, Helena, 2021. "Social impacts of additive manufacturing: A stakeholder-driven framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Foshammer, Jeppe & Søberg, Peder Veng & Helo, Petri & Ituarte, Iñigo Flores, 2022. "Identification of aftermarket and legacy parts suitable for additive manufacturing: A knowledge management-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    7. Sun, Luoyi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Yixiao, 2020. "How to price 3D-printed products? Pricing strategy for 3D printing platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Beltagui, Ahmad & Kunz, Nathan & Gold, Stefan, 2020. "The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable supply chain innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 23-34.
    10. Delic, Mia & Eyers, Daniel R., 2020. "The effect of additive manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: An empirical analysis from the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Yang, Yiran & Li, Lin, 2018. "Cost modeling and analysis for Mask Image Projection Stereolithography additive manufacturing: Simultaneous production with mixed geometries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 146-158.
    12. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    14. Ukobitz, Desirée Valeria & Faullant, Rita, 2022. "The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    16. Colosimo, Bianca Maria & Cavalli, Simona & Grasso, Marco, 2020. "A cost model for the economic evaluation of in-situ monitoring tools in metal additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    17. Jiang, Ruth & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2017. "Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 84-97.
    18. Inês Ribeiro & Florinda Matos & Celeste Jacinto & Hafiz Salman & Gonçalo Cardeal & Helena Carvalho & Radu Godina & Paulo Peças, 2020. "Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Candi, Marina & Beltagui, Ahmad, 2019. "Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 63-73.
    20. Robert B. Handfield & James Aitken & Neil Turner & Tillmann Boehme & Cecil Bozarth, 2022. "Assessing Adoption Factors for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Case Studies," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:20-:d:198096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.