IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v113y2022ics0166497221001991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing

Author

Listed:
  • Ukobitz, Desirée Valeria
  • Faullant, Rita

Abstract

Radical technologies such as 3DPT (3D printing technology) continue to disrupt traditional manufacturing processes, perhaps even offering the key to long-term organizational survival. These radical forces appear to increase the pressure on internal and external organizational stakeholders to recognize, adopt and adapt to new technologies in order to sustain organizational competitiveness. This research subsequently investigates the key drivers in the organizational adoption of 3DPT to identify whether adoption is driven by a desire for homogeneity, or by a purely rationalistic evaluation of the perceived intrinsic value of the technology for the organization. This research surveyed 114 manufacturing firms operating in the Mexican footwear cluster to identify the impact of complex institutional forces on the adoption of radical 3DPT technologies. Data was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling, concluding that mimetic, alongside normative, isomorphic pressures, exerted a substantial impact on the 3DPT adoption decision. While competitor behavior appeared to represent significant driver for adoption, our results also indicated that normative forces acted decisively on evaluations of the technology's perceived value. We found no evidence of coercive pressures, also noting a negative relationship between low adoption rates and institutional potential. The study concludes with an observation that isomorphism can be leveraged to actuate adoption rates, with recommendations for further research identified and research limitations addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ukobitz, Desirée Valeria & Faullant, Rita, 2022. "The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0166497221001991
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497221001991
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Justin, 2006. "Growth of industry clusters and innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 827-850, November.
    2. Katrin Oettmeier & Erik Hofmann, 2017. "Additive manufacturing technology adoption: an empirical analysis of general and supply chain-related determinants," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 97-124, January.
    3. Yeh, Ching-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 209-216.
    4. Robert D. Dewar & Jane E. Dutton, 1986. "The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1422-1433, November.
    5. Qingfeng Wang & Xu Sun & Sue Cobb & Glyn Lawson & Sarah Sharples, 2016. "3D printing system: an innovation for small-scale manufacturing in home settings? – early adopters of 3D printing systems in China," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6017-6032, October.
    6. Rajiv K. Sinha & Charles H. Noble, 2008. "The adoption of radical manufacturing technologies and firm survival," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 943-962, September.
    7. Candi, Marina & Beltagui, Ahmad, 2019. "Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 63-73.
    8. K.S. Tan & U.C. Eze & S.C. Chong, 2009. "Factors influencing internet-based information and communication technologies adoption among Malaysian small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 397-418.
    9. Schniederjans, Dara G., 2017. "Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: A survey analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 287-298.
    10. Mellor, Stephen & Hao, Liang & Zhang, David, 2014. "Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 194-201.
    11. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Weller, Christian & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2015. "Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 43-56.
    14. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2016. "From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 214-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Granados, Cristian & Ayala, Yarid & Ramos-Mejia, Monica, 2024. "Is it substantive or just symbolic? Understanding innovation theater in organisations: The case of technology-based innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Alghafes, Rasha & Badghish, Saeed, 2023. "Different strokes for different folks: Comparative analysis of 3D printing in large, medium and small firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Maurizio Cavallari, 2023. "Organizational Determinants and Compliance Behavior to Shape Information Security Plan," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Robert B. Handfield & James Aitken & Neil Turner & Tillmann Boehme & Cecil Bozarth, 2022. "Assessing Adoption Factors for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Case Studies," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Alghafes, Rasha & Badghish, Saeed, 2023. "Different strokes for different folks: Comparative analysis of 3D printing in large, medium and small firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Stornelli, Aldo & Ozcan, Sercan & Simms, Christopher, 2021. "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and innovation: A systematic literature review on barriers, enablers, and innovation types," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    7. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Serena Strazzullo, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing and Green Information Systems as Technological Capabilities for Firm Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 515-534, December.
    9. Beltagui, Ahmad & Sesis, Achilleas & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Patrick Holzmann & Erich J. Schwarz & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 259-275, February.
    12. Yeh, Ching-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 209-216.
    13. Chekurov, Sergei & Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini & Salmi, Mika & Roda, Irene & Jussila, Ari, 2018. "The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 87-97.
    14. Beltagui, Ahmad & Kunz, Nathan & Gold, Stefan, 2020. "The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable supply chain innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 23-34.
    16. Fabrizio Baldassarre & Francesca Ricciardi, 2017. "The Additive Manufacturing in the Industry 4.0 Era: The Case of an Italian FabLab," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 105-115, October.
    17. Marco Savastano & Carlo Amendola & Francesco Bellini & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, 2019. "Contextual Impacts on Industrial Processes Brought by the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, February.
    18. Victor Verboeket & Harold Krikke, 2019. "Additive Manufacturing: A Game Changer in Supply Chain Design," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    20. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0166497221001991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.