IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v2y2022i4p24-361d959831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Employees’ Responses to Abusive Supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaochuan Song

    (Department of Management, Marketing, and Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA)

Abstract

Abusive supervision has been found to negatively impact employees. Extant literature based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET) has suggested that employees who experience abusive supervision are likely to engage in workplace deviant behaviors to respond to abusive supervision. However, from the standpoint of power distance, employees do not always respond to abusive supervision in negative ways. This paper aims to investigate employees’ perceptions and reactions to abusive supervision over time as well as factors that can impact their coping strategies to abusive supervision. By conducting two studies, including (1) a lagged-designed study with path analysis and mediation and moderation tests and (2) an experiment with independent sample t -tests, I examine employees’ reactions to abusive supervision over time as well as factors that impact their reactions. Results suggest that, over time, employees are likely to reconcile with their abusive supervisors. Furthermore, employees are less likely to reconcile with their abusive supervisor after engaging in workplace deviant behaviors. Furthermore, employees’ need for harmony (NFH) and the perceived value of the relationship with the supervisor (VOR) can impact their reactions to abusive supervision. This paper moves beyond the Social Exchange Theory, the overarching theory in abusive supervision literature, expands our understanding of abusive supervision, and discusses employees’ responses to abusive supervision over time. Contributions, implications, and future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaochuan Song, 2022. "Investigating Employees’ Responses to Abusive Supervision," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:24-361:d:959831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/4/24/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/4/24/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linn Van Dyne & Soon Ang & Isabel C. Botero, 2003. "Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1359-1392, September.
    2. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 107-120, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James R. Detert & Linda K. Treviño, 2010. "Speaking Up to Higher-Ups: How Supervisors and Skip-Level Leaders Influence Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 249-270, February.
    2. Florian M. Artinger & Sabrina Artinger & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2019. "C. Y. A.: frequency and causes of defensive decisions in public administration," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 9-25, April.
    3. Xue Tong Dong & Yang Woon Chung & Jeong Kwon Yun, 2023. "The Mediating Effects of Anxiety and Happiness and the Moderating Effect of Social Network Services for Employee Silence and Psychological Withdrawal Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Carmen León-Mantero & José Carlos Casas-Rosal & Alexander Maz-Machado & Miguel E Villarraga Rico, 2020. "Analysis of attitudinal components towards statistics among students from different academic degrees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Brian K Miller & Kay M Nicols & Silvia Clark & Alison Daniels & Whitney Grant, 2018. "Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha for scores on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Arzu Kader Harmanci Seren & İbrahim Topcu & Feride Eskin Bacaksiz & Nihal Unaldi Baydin & Emine Tokgoz Ekici & Aytolan Yildirim, 2018. "Organisational silence among nurses and physicians in public hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1440-1451, April.
    8. Ki-Seoung Lee & Yoon-Seo Kim & Hyoung-Chul Shin, 2023. "Effect of Hotel Employees’ Organizational Politics Perception on Organizational Silence, Organizational Cynicism, and Innovation Resistance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.
    9. David Marsden, 2013. "Individual Voice in Employment Relationships: A Comparison under Different Forms of Workplace Representation," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 221-258, January.
    10. Chin-Yi Shu & Nguyen Thi Nhu Quynh, 2015. "Guan-Xi, Loyalty, Contribution And ‘Speak-Up Behavior: The Role of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) as Mediator and Political Skill as Moderator," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 54-73.
    11. Zhining Wang & Shuang Ren & Doren Chadee & Yuhang Chen, 2024. "Employee Ethical Silence Under Exploitative Leadership: The Roles of Work Meaningfulness and Moral Potency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 59-76, February.
    12. Yang Ran & Hao Zhou, 2019. "How Does Customer–Company Identification Enhance Customer Voice Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Hooria Khan & Md Sohel Chowdhury & Dae-seok Kang, 2022. "Leaders’ Emotion Regulation and the Influence of Respect and Entitlement on Employee Silence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Muhammad Umer Azeem & Inam Ul Haq & Dirk Clercq & Cong Liu, 2024. "Why and When Do Employees Feel Guilty About Observing Supervisor Ostracism? The Critical Roles of Observers’ Silence Behavior and Leader–Member Exchange Quality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 317-334, October.
    15. Xuezhe Quan & Myeong-Cheol Choi & Xiao Tan, 2023. "Relationship between Organizational Climate and Service Performance in South Korea and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Warr, Peter & Bindl, Uta K. & Parker, Sharon K. & Inceoglu, Ilke, 2014. "Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53129, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Peixu He & Zhenglong Peng & Hongdan Zhao & Christophe Estay, 2019. "How and When Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Leads to Employee Silence: A Moderated Mediation Model Based on Moral Disengagement and Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi Views," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 259-274, March.
    18. Zvi Stern & Tal Katz-Navon & Eitan Naveh, 2008. "The Influence of Situational Learning Orientation, Autonomy, and Voice on Error Making: The Case of Resident Physicians," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1553-1564, September.
    19. Michael Hennessy & Amy Bleakley & Martin Fishbein, 2012. "Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 640(1), pages 42-57, March.
    20. Anastasia Cheliatsidou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Alexandros Garefalakis & Ioannis Passas & Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos, 2023. "Exploring Attitudes towards Whistleblowing in Relation to Sustainable Municipalities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:24-361:d:959831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.