IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i9p966-d543342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DICER 2.0: A New Model Checker for Data-Flow Errors of Concurrent Software Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dongming Xiang

    (The School of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Fang Zhao

    (The MoE Key Lab of Embedded System & Service Computing, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yaping Liu

    (The School of Transportation Management, Zhejiang Institute of Communications, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Petri nets are widely used to model concurrent software systems. Currently, there are many different kinds of Petri net tools that can analyze system properties such as deadlocks, reachability and liveness. However, most tools are not suitable to analyze data-flow errors of concurrent systems because they do not formalize data information and lack efficient computing methods for analyzing data-flows. Especially when a concurrent system has so many concurrent data operations, these Petri net tools easily suffer from the state–space explosion problem and pseudo-states. To alleviate these problems, we develop a new model checker DICER 2.0. By using this tool, we can model the control-flows and data-flows of concurrent software systems. Moreover, the errors of data inconsistency can be detected based on the unfolding techniques, and some model-checking can be done via the guard-driven reachability graph (GRG). Furthermore, some case studies and experiments are done to show the effectiveness and advantage of our tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongming Xiang & Fang Zhao & Yaping Liu, 2021. "DICER 2.0: A New Model Checker for Data-Flow Errors of Concurrent Software Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:9:p:966-:d:543342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/9/966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/9/966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Daohua & Zheng, Wei, 2018. "Formal model-based quantitative safety analysis using timed Coloured Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 62-79.
    2. Sherry X. Sun & J. Leon Zhao & Jay F. Nunamaker & Olivia R. Liu Sheng, 2006. "Formulating the Data-Flow Perspective for Business Process Management," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 374-391, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arava Tsoury & Pnina Soffer & Iris Reinhartz-Berger, 2020. "Data Impact Analysis in Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(1), pages 41-60, February.
    2. Singh, Prashant & Pasha, Junayed & Moses, Ren & Sobanjo, John & Ozguven, Eren E. & Dulebenets, Maxim A., 2022. "Development of exact and heuristic optimization methods for safety improvement projects at level crossings under conflicting objectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Luning Liu & Jingrui Ju & Yuqiang Feng, 2017. "An extensible framework for collaborative e-governance platform workflow modeling using data flow analysis," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 415-437, July.
    4. Chang, Hsin Hsin & Wang, I. Chen, 2011. "Enterprise Information Portals in support of business process, design teams and collaborative commerce performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 171-182.
    5. Tobias Wuttke & Thomas Haskamp & Michael Perscheid & Falk Uebernickel, 2024. "Building the Processes Behind the Product: How Digital Ventures Create Business Processes That Support Their Growth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 565-583, October.
    6. Bolbot, Victor & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Bujorianu, Luminita Manuela & Boulougouris, Evangelos & Vassalos, Dracos, 2019. "Vulnerabilities and safety assurance methods in Cyber-Physical Systems: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 179-193.
    7. Sherry X. Sun & Jing Zhao & Sumit Sarkar, 2017. "How High Should We Go? Determining Reservation Values to Negotiate Successfully for Composite Software Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 353-377, June.
    8. Amit V. Deokar & Jie Tao, 2021. "OrgMiner: A Framework for Discovering User-Related Process Intelligence from Event Logs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 753-772, June.
    9. Bolton, Matthew L. & Molinaro, Kylie A. & Houser, Adam M., 2019. "A formal method for assessing the impact of task-based erroneous human behavior on system safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 168-180.
    10. Yifan Chen & Genbao Zhang & Yan Ran, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Coupling Fault Propagation Based on Meta-Action for Computerized Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Tool," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, July.
    11. Xue Bai & Manuel Nunez & Jayant R. Kalagnanam, 2012. "Managing Data Quality Risk in Accounting Information Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 453-473, June.
    12. Amit V. Deokar & Jie Tao, 0. "OrgMiner: A Framework for Discovering User-Related Process Intelligence from Event Logs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    13. Xue Bai & Ramayya Krishnan & Rema Padman & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2013. "On Risk Management with Information Flows in Business Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 731-749, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:9:p:966-:d:543342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.