IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i11p1162-d559440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Financial Asset Neutrosophic Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel-Ioan Boloș

    (Department of Finance and Banks, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Ioana-Alexandra Bradea

    (Department of Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Camelia Delcea

    (Department of Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to model, with the help of neutrosophic fuzzy numbers, the optimal financial asset portfolios, offering additional information to those investing in the capital market. The optimal neutrosophic portfolios are those categories of portfolios consisting of two or more financial assets, modeled using neutrosophic triangular numbers, that allow for the determination of financial performance indicators, respectively the neutrosophic average, the neutrosophic risk, for each financial asset, and the neutrosophic covariance as well as the determination of the portfolio return, respectively of the portfolio risk. There are two essential conditions established by rational investors on the capital market to obtain an optimal financial assets portfolio, respectively by fixing the financial return at the estimated level as well as minimizing the risk of the financial assets neutrosophic portfolio. These conditions allowed us to compute the financial assets’ share in the total value of the neutrosophic portfolios, for which the financial return reaches the level set by investors and the financial risk has the minimum value. In financial terms, the financial assets’ share answers the legitimate question of rational investors in the capital market regarding the amount of money they must invest in compliance with the optimal conditions regarding the neutrosophic return and risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Ioana-Alexandra Bradea & Camelia Delcea, 2021. "Optimization of Financial Asset Neutrosophic Portfolios," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-36, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:11:p:1162-:d:559440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/11/1162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/11/1162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Francisco J. Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2009. "A Generalized Approach to Portfolio Optimization: Improving Performance by Constraining Portfolio Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 798-812, May.
    2. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Sérgio P. Santos & Paulo M. M. Rodrigues & Ronald W. Spahr, 2014. "How to create indices for bank branch financial performance measurement using MCDA techniques: an illustrative example," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 708-728, September.
    3. F. M. Bandi & J. R. Russell, 2008. "Microstructure Noise, Realized Variance, and Optimal Sampling," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(2), pages 339-369.
    4. Irina Georgescu & Louis Aimé Fono, 2019. "A Portfolio Choice Problem in the Framework of Expected Utility Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Hossein Dastkhan & Hamid Reza Golmakani & Naser Shams Gharneh, 2013. "How to obtain a series of satisfying portfolios: a fuzzy portfolio management approach," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 333-351.
    6. Lidiia Karpenko & Iryna Chunytska & Nataliia Oliinyk & Nataliia Poprozman & Olha Bezkorovaina, 2020. "Consideration of Risk Factors in Corporate Property Portfolio Management," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viet Anh Nguyen & Fan Zhang & Shanshan Wang & Jose Blanchet & Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2021. "Robustifying Conditional Portfolio Decisions via Optimal Transport," Papers 2103.16451, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    2. Ken Kobayashi & Yuichi Takano & Kazuhide Nakata, 2021. "Bilevel cutting-plane algorithm for cardinality-constrained mean-CVaR portfolio optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 493-528, October.
    3. Martin Branda & Max Bucher & Michal Červinka & Alexandra Schwartz, 2018. "Convergence of a Scholtes-type regularization method for cardinality-constrained optimization problems with an application in sparse robust portfolio optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 503-530, June.
    4. Ziegelmann, Flávio Augusto & Borges, Bruna & Caldeira, João F., 2015. "Selection of Minimum Variance Portfolio Using Intraday Data: An Empirical Comparison Among Different Realized Measures for BM&FBovespa Data," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 35(1), October.
    5. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2013. "Robust Portfolio Control with Stochastic Factor Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 874-893, August.
    6. Viet Anh Nguyen & Soroosh Shafiee & Damir Filipovi'c & Daniel Kuhn, 2021. "Mean-Covariance Robust Risk Measurement," Papers 2112.09959, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    7. Hsieh, Chung-Han, 2024. "On solving robust log-optimal portfolio: A supporting hyperplane approximation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1129-1139.
    8. Qingliang Fan & Ruike Wu & Yanrong Yang, 2024. "Shocks-adaptive Robust Minimum Variance Portfolio for a Large Universe of Assets," Papers 2410.01826, arXiv.org.
    9. Zhu, Bo & Zhang, Tianlun, 2021. "Long-term wealth growth portfolio allocation under parameter uncertainty: A non-conservative robust approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Chung-Han Hsieh, 2022. "On Solving Robust Log-Optimal Portfolio: A Supporting Hyperplane Approximation Approach," Papers 2202.03858, arXiv.org.
    11. Kobayashi, Ken & Takano, Yuichi & Nakata, Kazuhide, 2023. "Cardinality-constrained distributionally robust portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1173-1182.
    12. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    13. Elisa Alòs & Maria Elvira Mancino & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Volatility and volatility-linked derivatives: estimation, modeling, and pricing," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 321-349, December.
    14. Takahashi, Makoto & Watanabe, Toshiaki & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2016. "Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 437-457.
    15. Chuong Luong & Nikolai Dokuchaev, 2016. "Modeling Dependency Of Volatility On Sampling Frequency Via Delay Equations," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    17. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    18. Chen, Qihao & Huang, Zhuo & Liang, Fang, 2023. "Measuring systemic risk with high-frequency data: A realized GARCH approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    20. Nathan Lassance & Victor DeMiguel & Frédéric Vrins, 2022. "Optimal Portfolio Diversification via Independent Component Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 55-72, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:11:p:1162-:d:559440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.