IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i7p1106-d380827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Comparative Analysis of New Personalized Recommender Algorithms with Specific Features for Large Scale Datasets

Author

Listed:
  • S. Bhaskaran

    (School of Computing, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India)

  • Raja Marappan

    (School of Computing, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India)

  • B. Santhi

    (School of Computing, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India)

Abstract

Nowadays, because of the tremendous amount of information that humans and machines produce every day, it has become increasingly hard to choose the more relevant content across a broad range of choices. This research focuses on the design of two different intelligent optimization methods using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for real-life applications that are used to improve the process of generation of recommenders. In the first method, the modified cluster based intelligent collaborative filtering is applied with the sequential clustering that operates on the values of dataset, user′s neighborhood set, and the size of the recommendation list. This strategy splits the given data set into different subsets or clusters and the recommendation list is extracted from each group for constructing the better recommendation list. In the second method, the specific features-based customized recommender that works in the training and recommendation steps by applying the split and conquer strategy on the problem datasets, which are clustered into a minimum number of clusters and the better recommendation list, is created among all the clusters. This strategy automatically tunes the tuning parameter λ that serves the role of supervised learning in generating the better recommendation list for the large datasets. The quality of the proposed recommenders for some of the large scale datasets is improved compared to some of the well-known existing methods. The proposed methods work well when λ = 0.5 with the size of the recommendation list, |L| = 30 and the size of the neighborhood, | S | < 30. For a large value of | S |, the significant difference of the root mean square error becomes smaller in the proposed methods. For large scale datasets, simulation of the proposed methods when varying the user sizes and when the user size exceeds 500, the experimental results show that better values of the metrics are obtained and the proposed method 2 performs better than proposed method 1. The significant differences are obtained in these methods because the structure of computation of the methods depends on the number of user attributes, λ, the number of bipartite graph edges, and |L|. The better values of the ( Precision , Recall ) metrics obtained with size as 3000 for the large scale Book-Crossing dataset in the proposed methods are (0.0004, 0.0042) and (0.0004, 0.0046) respectively. The average computational time of the proposed methods takes <10 seconds for the large scale datasets and yields better performance compared to the well-known existing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Bhaskaran & Raja Marappan & B. Santhi, 2020. "Design and Comparative Analysis of New Personalized Recommender Algorithms with Specific Features for Large Scale Datasets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1106-:d:380827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu-Guo Zhang & An Zeng, 2015. "Information Filtering via Heterogeneous Diffusion in Online Bipartite Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Ma, Wenping & Ren, Chen & Wu, Yue & Wang, Shanfeng & Feng, Xiang, 2017. "Personalized recommendation via unbalance full-connectivity inference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 483(C), pages 273-279.
    3. Katarya, Rahul & Verma, Om Prakash, 2016. "Recent developments in affective recommender systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 182-190.
    4. Syed Manzar Abbas & Khubaib Amjad Alam & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2019. "A Soft-Rough Set Based Approach for Handling Contextual Sparsity in Context-Aware Video Recommender Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-36, August.
    5. Wei Zeng & An Zeng & Ming-Sheng Shang & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2013. "Information Filtering in Sparse Online Systems: Recommendation via Semi-Local Diffusion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sundaresan Bhaskaran & Raja Marappan & Balachandran Santhi, 2021. "Design and Analysis of a Cluster-Based Intelligent Hybrid Recommendation System for E-Learning Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yin, Likang & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Measuring transferring similarity via local information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 498(C), pages 102-115.
    3. Hu, Liang & Ren, Liang & Lin, Wenbin, 2018. "A reconsideration of negative ratings for network-based recommendation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 690-701.
    4. Liao, Hao & Zeng, An & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2015. "Predicting missing links via correlation between nodes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 216-223.
    5. Yu, Fei & Zeng, An & Gillard, Sébastien & Medo, Matúš, 2016. "Network-based recommendation algorithms: A review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 192-208.
    6. Keyvan Vahidy Rodpysh & Seyed Javad Mirabedini & Touraj Banirostam, 2023. "Employing singular value decomposition and similarity criteria for alleviating cold start and sparse data in context-aware recommender systems," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 681-707, June.
    7. Sundus Ayyaz & Usman Qamar & Raheel Nawaz, 2018. "HCF-CRS: A Hybrid Content based Fuzzy Conformal Recommender System for providing recommendations with confidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1106-:d:380827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.