IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i6p895-d366237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Sharing Staff between Outbound and Inbound Airport Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Sultan Alodhaibi

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences and Arts in Al-Rass, Qassim University, Al-Rass 51921, Saudi Arabia)

  • Robert L. Burdett

    (School of Mathematical Science, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

  • Prasad K.D.V. Yarlagadda

    (School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

Abstract

This paper proposes an advanced simulation-optimization approach to evaluate and optimize the passenger flows within international airports. This approach allocates resources intelligently during the simulation process and balances demand and service quality. The resource allocation performed by our Advanced Resource Management (ARM) algorithm was used to develop an integrated system for arranging resources, identifying the proper resources, and allocating them throughout the model. It was used to investigate the influences of different staff allocation techniques on the inbound and outbound processes of an airport terminal. The purpose of the proposed simulation-optimization approach is to enhance passenger satisfaction through ensuring reasonable wait times during processing at the lowest cost possible (minimal staff hours).

Suggested Citation

  • Sultan Alodhaibi & Robert L. Burdett & Prasad K.D.V. Yarlagadda, 2020. "A Framework for Sharing Staff between Outbound and Inbound Airport Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:6:p:895-:d:366237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/6/895/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/6/895/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahmut Parlar & Moosa Sharafali, 2008. "Dynamic Allocation of Airline Check-In Counters: A Queueing Optimization Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1410-1424, August.
    2. D. Dowling & M. Krishnamoorthy & H. Mackenzie & D. Sier, 1997. "Staff rostering at a large international airport," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 72(0), pages 125-147, January.
    3. Yonghwa Park & Seung B. Ahn, 2003. "Optimal assignment for check-in counters based on passenger arrival behaviour at an airport," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 397-416, October.
    4. Wu, Paul Pao-Yen & Mengersen, Kerrie, 2013. "A review of models and model usage scenarios for an airport complex system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 124-140.
    5. Odoni, Amedeo R. & de Neufville, Richard, 1992. "Passenger terminal design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 27-35, January.
    6. Kierzkowski, Artur & Kisiel, Tomasz, 2017. "Simulation model of security control system functioning: A case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(PB), pages 173-185.
    7. Fernandes, Elton & Pacheco, R. R., 2002. "Efficient use of airport capacity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 225-238, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Sanz, à lvaro & Fernández de Marcos, Alberto & Pérez-Castán, Javier A. & Comendador, Fernando Gómez & Arnaldo Valdés, Rosa & París Loreiro, à ngel, 2021. "Queue behavioural patterns for passengers at airport terminals: A machine learning approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Ying Liu & Xiuqing Yang & Yong Xiang & Yi Chen & Gang Mao & Xinzhi Zhou, 2022. "Allocation and optimization of shared self-service check-in system based on integer programming model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 532-556, August.
    3. Ornek, M. Arslan & Ozturk, Cemalettin & Sugut, Ipek, 2019. "Model-based heuristic for counter assignment problem with operational constrains: A case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 57-64.
    4. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2018. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    5. Lalita, T.R. & Manna, D.K. & Murthy, G.S.R., 2020. "Mathematical formulations for large scale check-in counter allocation problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Mujica Mota, Miguel, 2015. "Check-in allocation improvements through the use of a simulation–optimization approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 320-335.
    7. Thampan, Aromal & Sinha, Kapil & Gurjar, B.R. & Rajasekar, E., 2020. "Functional efficiency in airport terminals: A review on Overall and Stratified Service Quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. KIyIldI, R. Koray & Karasahin, M., 2008. "The capacity analysis of the check-in unit of Antalya Airport using the fuzzy logic method," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 610-619, May.
    9. Stefan Helber & Justine Broihan & Young Jae Jang & Peter Hecker & Thomas Feuerle, 2018. "Location Planning for Dynamic Wireless Charging Systems for Electric Airport Passenger Buses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. A. Assaf, 2011. "Accounting for technological differences in modelling the performance of airports: a Bayesian approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(18), pages 2267-2275.
    11. Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Airline's choice of aircraft size - Explanations and implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 500-510, June.
    12. Yu, Ming-Miin, 2004. "Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in Taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 295-303.
    13. Mahmoudi, Reza & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2020. "The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Hansen, Mark & Li, Ang, 2017. "Multiple airport regions based on inter-airport temporal distances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 84-98.
    15. Gutiérrez, Ester & Lozano, Sebastián, 2016. "Efficiency assessment and output maximization possibilities of European small and medium sized airports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 3-14.
    16. Li, Yongli & Gao, Xin & Xu, Zhiwei & Zhou, Xuanrui, 2018. "Network-based queuing model for simulating passenger throughput at an airport security checkpoint," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 13-24.
    17. Tae Hoon Oum & Katsuhiro Yamaguchi & Yuichiro Yoshida, 2011. "Efficiency Measurement Theory and its Application to Airport Benchmarking," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. de Lange, Robert & Samoilovich, Ilya & van der Rhee, Bo, 2013. "Virtual queuing at airport security lanes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 153-165.
    19. Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda & Renneboog, Luc & Verga-Matos, Pedro, 2017. "Measuring highway efficiency : A DEA approach and the Malquist index," Other publications TiSEM 23264815-321e-45a3-83ee-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Ming-Miin Yu, 2010. "Capacity efficiency measurement using a three-stage DEA approach: evidence from domestic airports in Taiwan," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 221-235, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:6:p:895-:d:366237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.