IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i4p611-d346529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits and Limitations of the Artificial with Respect to the Traditional Learning of Mathematics

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Gr. Voskoglou

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Graduate Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, 22334 Patras, Greece)

  • Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Abbasia, 11566 Cairo, Egypt)

Abstract

The present article focuses on the role that the artificial teaching and learning of mathematics could play for education in the forthcoming era of a new industrial revolution that will be characterized by the development of an advanced Internet of things and energy, and by the cyber-physical systems controlled through it. Starting with a brief review of the traditional learning theories and methods of teaching mathematics, the article continues by studying the use of computers and of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematics education. The advantages and disadvantages of artificial with respect to traditional learning in the classroom are also discussed, and the article closes with the general conclusions and a few comments on the perspectives of future research on the subject.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Gr. Voskoglou & Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, 2020. "Benefits and Limitations of the Artificial with Respect to the Traditional Learning of Mathematics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:611-:d:346529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/4/611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/4/611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    2. Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, 2019. "Computational Intelligence in Smart Education and Learning," Conferences of the department Informatics, Publishing house Science and Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 30-40.
    3. Carter, Susan Payne & Greenberg, Kyle & Walker, Michael S., 2017. "The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 118-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    2. Hall, Caroline & Lundin, Martin & Sibbmark, Kristina, 2019. "A laptop for every child? The impact of ICT on educational outcomes," Working Paper Series 2019:26, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    3. Marie Connolly & Catherine Haeck, 2018. "Le lien entre la taille des classes et les compétences cognitives et non cognitives," CIRANO Project Reports 2018rp-18, CIRANO.
    4. Patterson, Richard W. & Patterson, Robert M., 2017. "Computers and productivity: Evidence from laptop use in the college classroom," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 66-79.
    5. Luca Bonacini & Marina Murat, 2023. "Beyond the Covid-19 pandemic: remote learning and education inequalities," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 207-236, February.
    6. Haggag, Kareem & Patterson, Richard W. & Pope, Nolan G. & Feudo, Aaron, 2021. "Attribution bias in major decisions: Evidence from the United States Military Academy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    8. Kana Okano & Jakub R Kaczmarzyk & John D E Gabrieli, 2018. "Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Meyer, Kevin, 2022. "Do laptops in the classroom produce negative externalities? Evidence from a classroom field experiment," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. Duncan Watson & Louise Parker, 2016. "The hullaballoo over e-learning? Technology and pluralism in economics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1159813-115, December.
    11. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    12. Michael S. Kofoed & Lucas Gebhart & Dallas Gilmore & Ryan Moschitto, 2024. "Zooming to Class? Experimental Evidence on College Students' Online Learning during COVID-19," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 324-340, September.
    13. Smith, Kasee L. & Johnson, Aaron J. & Johnson, Dain R., 2021. "Flipping Together: A Collaborative Approach to a Flipped Class," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(6), January.
    14. Samah Zakareya & Safa’a Alahmad, 2019. "Inverted Teaching for Improving the Teaching Performance of EFL Student Teachers at Jubail College of Education," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Johnson, Marianne & Meder, Martin E., 2024. "Twenty-three years of teaching economics with technology," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. Oreopoulos, Philip, 2020. "Promises and Limitations of Nudging in Education," IZA Discussion Papers 13718, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Gulley, O. David & Jackson, Aaron L., 2016. "A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-33.
    18. Meginnis, Keila & Campbell, Danny, 2017. "Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 18-27.
    19. Cho Naing & Maxine A. Whittaker & Htar Htar Aung & Dinesh Kumar Chellappan & Amy Riegelman, 2023. "The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    20. Patterson, Richard & Pope, Nolan G. & Feudo, Aaron, 2019. "Timing Is Everything: Evidence from College Major Decisions," IZA Discussion Papers 12069, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:611-:d:346529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.