IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning

Author

Listed:
  • Kana Okano
  • Jakub R Kaczmarzyk
  • John D E Gabrieli

Abstract

Digital learning is becoming the most commonly used portal for workplace learning, but its effectiveness is not clearly understood. We studied 99 employees on-site in a large company as they watched an already used and required training video. Employees were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) a baseline condition of watching the video as in current practice; (2) a spontaneous discussion condition in which participants discussed the video with colleagues immediately after the video without any guidelines; (3) a structured discussion condition in which participants discussed the video with colleagues immediately after the video with an instructor guiding discussion topics; and (4) a testing condition in which test questions were interpolated throughout the video. Memory for the content of the video was measured on a recognition memory test completed 20–35 hours after watching the video. Employees who were in the interpolated-testing or structured discussion conditions had significantly superior memory for the video content (26% and 25% better respectively) relative to typical video viewing; spontaneous discussion did not enhance memory for content. These findings demonstrate that interpolated testing and structured discussion enhance information retention in the workplace and point to how learning science may accelerate workplace learning more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Kana Okano & Jakub R Kaczmarzyk & John D E Gabrieli, 2018. "Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    2. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Duncan Watson & Louise Parker, 2016. "The hullaballoo over e-learning? Technology and pluralism in economics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1159813-115, December.
    4. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    5. Smith, Kasee L. & Johnson, Aaron J. & Johnson, Dain R., 2021. "Flipping Together: A Collaborative Approach to a Flipped Class," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(6), January.
    6. Samah Zakareya & Safa’a Alahmad, 2019. "Inverted Teaching for Improving the Teaching Performance of EFL Student Teachers at Jubail College of Education," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Gulley, O. David & Jackson, Aaron L., 2016. "A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-33.
    8. Meginnis, Keila & Campbell, Danny, 2017. "Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 18-27.
    9. Cho Naing & Maxine A. Whittaker & Htar Htar Aung & Dinesh Kumar Chellappan & Amy Riegelman, 2023. "The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    10. Boulatoff, Catherine & Cyrus, Teresa L., 2022. "Improving student outcomes in large introductory courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    11. Vahé Nerguizian & Radhi Mhiri & Catherine Mounier & Daniel Lemieux & Adel Omar Dahmane, 2014. "Flipping from Flipped Classroom to Multimodal Mobile Learning (MML)," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0802617, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Hala Dalbani & Safaa Eissa & Sharifah Fatimah Syed-Ahmad & Norah Almusharraf, 2022. "Transitioning to Flipped Classrooms: Instructors’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Aricò, Fabio R. & Lancaster, Simon J., 2018. "Facilitating active learning and enhancing student self-assessment skills," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 6-13.
    14. Patrick Conway & Derek Stimel & Ann E. Davis & Monica Hartmann, 2010. "Case Use in Economics Instruction," Chapters, in: Michael K. Salemi & William B. Walstad (ed.), Teaching Innovations in Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Adam Butt, 2014. "Student Views On The Use Of A Flipped Classroom Approach: Evidence From Australia," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 33-43.
    16. Joseph T. Lizier & Michael S. Harré & Melanie Mitchell & Simon DeDeo & Conor Finn & Kristian Lindgren & Amanda L. Lizier & Hiroki Sayama, 2018. "An Interview-Based Study of Pioneering Experiences in Teaching and Learning Complex Systems in Higher Education," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, November.
    17. Samah Ahmad, 2016. "The Flipped Classroom Model to Develop Egyptian EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 166-166, September.
    18. Gemma Abió & Manuela Alcáñiz & Marta Gómez-Puig & Gloria Rubert & Mónica Serrano & Alexandrina Stoyanova & Montserrat Vilalta-Bufí, 2016. "“Retaking a course in Economics: Innovative methodologies to simulate academic performance in large groups”," IREA Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2016.
    19. Hedviga Tkáčová & Martina Pavlíková & Miroslav Tvrdoň & Zita Jenisová, 2021. "The Use of Media in the Field of Individual Responsibility for Sustainable Development in Schools: A Proposal for an Approach to Learning about Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Miriam Elizabeth Erazo Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Vinan Carrasco & Myriam Elizabeth Murillo Naranjo & Andres Leandro Rodriguez Galan, 2020. "The inverted classroom in education: A resilient methodological tool for social change," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 142-155, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.