IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i11p1979-d441016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machinery Failure Approach and Spectral Analysis to Study the Reaction Time Dynamics over Consecutive Visual Stimuli: An Entropy-Based Model

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel E. Iglesias-Martínez

    (Departamento de Telecomunicaciones, Universidad de Pinar del Río, Pinar del Río E-20100, Cuba
    Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat Politècnica de València, E-46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Moisés Hernaiz-Guijarro

    (Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat Politècnica de València, E-46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Juan Carlos Castro-Palacio

    (Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat Politècnica de València, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
    Current affiliation: Department of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Automation and Applied Physics, Technical University of Madrid, E-28012 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pedro Fernández-de-Córdoba

    (Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat Politècnica de València, E-46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • J. M. Isidro

    (Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat Politècnica de València, E-46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Esperanza Navarro-Pardo

    (Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Grupo de Modelización Interdisciplinar, InterTech, Universitat de València, E-46010 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The reaction times of individuals over consecutive visual stimuli have been studied using an entropy-based model and a failure machinery approach. The used tools include the fast Fourier transform and a spectral entropy analysis. The results indicate that the reaction times produced by the independently responding individuals to visual stimuli appear to be correlated. The spectral analysis and the entropy of the spectrum yield that there are features of similarity in the response times of each participant and among them. Furthermore, the analysis of the mistakes made by the participants during the reaction time experiments concluded that they follow a behavior which is consistent with the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) model, widely used in industry for the predictive diagnosis of electrical machines and equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel E. Iglesias-Martínez & Moisés Hernaiz-Guijarro & Juan Carlos Castro-Palacio & Pedro Fernández-de-Córdoba & J. M. Isidro & Esperanza Navarro-Pardo, 2020. "Machinery Failure Approach and Spectral Analysis to Study the Reaction Time Dynamics over Consecutive Visual Stimuli: An Entropy-Based Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:11:p:1979-:d:441016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/1979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/1979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Krajbich & Björn Bartling & Todd Hare & Ernst Fehr, 2015. "Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Garagnani, Michele, 2020. "The cognitive foundations of cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 71-85.
    2. Jacquemet, N. & Luchini, S. & Malézieux, A. & Shogren, J.F., 2020. "Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Strittmatter, Anthony & Sunde, Uwe & Zegners, Dainis, 2022. "Speed, Quality, and the Optimal Timing of Complex Decisions: Field Evidence," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 317, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    4. Nicolas Jacquemet & Stephane Luchini & Jason Shogren & Verity Watson, 2019. "Discrete Choice under Oaths," Post-Print halshs-02136103, HAL.
    5. Backhaus, Teresa & Huck, Steffen & Leutgeb, Johannes & Oprea, Ryan, 2023. "Learning through period and physical time," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 21-29.
    6. Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Wollbrant, Conny E., 2017. "Cognitive foundations of cooperation revisited: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012, 2014)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 133-138.
    7. Castillo, Marco & Dickinson, David L., 2022. "Sleep restriction increases coordination failure," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 358-370.
    8. Recalde, María P. & Riedl, Arno & Vesterlund, Lise, 2018. "Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-147.
    9. Lohse, Tim & Simon, Sven A. & Konrad, Kai A., 2018. "Deception under time pressure: Conscious decision or a problem of awareness?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 31-42.
    10. Johannes Lohse & Timo Goeschl & Johannes H. Diederich, 2017. "Giving is a Question of Time: Response Times and Contributions to an Environmental Public Good," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(3), pages 455-477, July.
    11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2021. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
    12. Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 591-616, March.
    13. Markus Christen & Darcia Narvaez & Julaine D Zenk & Michael Villano & Charles R Crowell & Daniel R Moore, 2021. "Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Fadong Chen & Urs Fischbacher, 2016. "Response time and click position: cheap indicators of preferences," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 2(2), pages 109-126, November.
    15. Falk, Armin, 2021. "Facing yourself – A note on self-image," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 724-734.
    16. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2021. "Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 558-592, June.
    17. Drew Fudenberg & Whitney Newey & Philipp Strack & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2020. "Testing the drift-diffusion model," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(52), pages 33141-33148, December.
    18. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Akihiro Nishi & Nicholas A Christakis & David G Rand, 2017. "Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, February.
    20. Sascha Grehl & Andreas Tutić, 2022. "Intuition, reflection, and prosociality: Evidence from a field experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:11:p:1979-:d:441016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.