Response time and click position: cheap indicators of preferences
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s40881-016-0026-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Fadong Chen & Urs Fischbacher, 2015. "Response Time and Click Position: Cheap Indicators of Preferences," TWI Research Paper Series 102, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
References listed on IDEAS
- Ian Krajbich & Björn Bartling & Todd Hare & Ernst Fehr, 2015. "Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
- Ben Greiner, 2015. "Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 1(1), pages 114-125, July.
- Piovesan, Marco & Wengström, Erik, 2009.
"Fast or fair? A study of response times,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 193-196, November.
- Marco Piovesan & Erik Wengström, 2008. "Fast or Fair? A Study of Response Times," Discussion Papers 08-09, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:771-781 is not listed on IDEAS
- David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
- Anja Achtziger & Carlos Alós-Ferrer, 2014. "Fast or Rational? A Response-Times Study of Bayesian Updating," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 923-938, April.
- Urs Fischbacher, 2007. "z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 171-178, June.
- Elena Reutskaja & Rosemarie Nagel & Colin F. Camerer & Antonio Rangel, 2011. "Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 900-926, April.
- Isabelle Brocas & Juan D. Carrillo & Stephanie W. Wang & Colin F. Camerer, 2014. "Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(3), pages 944-970.
- repec:grz:wpsses:2013-05 is not listed on IDEAS
- Schulz, Jonathan F. & Fischbacher, Urs & Thöni, Christian & Utikal, Verena, 2014. "Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 77-87.
- Fadong Chen & Urs Fischbacher, 2015. "Cognitive Processes of Distributional Preferences: A Response Time Study," TWI Research Paper Series 101, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Jiang, Ting & Potters, Jan & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2016. "Eye tracking social preferences," Other publications TiSEM d6c0b33d-408d-48e2-9592-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2007.
"Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(523), pages 1243-1259, October.
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Discussion Papers 1424, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Rubinstein, Ariel, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Economic Theory and Applications Working Papers 12181, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Working Papers 2006.36, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
- Alec Smith & B. Douglas Bernheim & Colin F. Camerer & Antonio Rangel, 2014.
"Neural Activity Reveals Preferences without Choices,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 1-36, May.
- Alec Smith & B. Douglas Bernheim & Colin Camerer & Antonio Rangel, 2013. "Neural Activity Reveals Preferences Without Choices," NBER Working Papers 19270, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Joseph Tao-yi Wang & Michael Spezio & Colin F. Camerer, 2010. "Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth Telling and Deception in Sender-Receiver Games," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 984-1007, June.
- Kurt A. Ackermann & Jürgen Fleiß & Ryan O. Murphy, 2016. "Reciprocity as an Individual Difference," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 60(2), pages 340-367, March.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:750-758 is not listed on IDEAS
- Ian Krajbich & Bastiaan Oud & Ernst Fehr, 2014. "Benefits of Neuroeconomic Modeling: New Policy Interventions and Predictors of Preference," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 501-506, May.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:6:p:510-522 is not listed on IDEAS
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2007. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: Response Times Study," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000001011, UCLA Department of Economics.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Clithero, John A., 2018. "Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 61-86.
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
- Markus Eyting, 2022. "Why do we Discriminate? The Role of Motivated Reasoning," Working Papers 2208, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Arkady Konovalov & Ian Krajbich, 2016. "Revealed Indifference: Using Response Times to Infer Preferences," Working Papers 16-01, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
- Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Eyting, Markus, 2022. "Why do we discriminate? The role of motivated reasoning," SAFE Working Paper Series 356, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
- David J. Cooper & Ian Krajbich & Charles N. Noussair, 2019. "Choice-Process Data in Experimental Economics," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, August.
- Dai Quy Le & Daisung Jang, 2023. "Individual Differences and Situational Constraint Predict Information Search in Negotiation Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 667-699, June.
- Soliño, M. & Alía, R. & Agúndez, D., 2020. "Citizens' preferences for research programs on forest genetic resources: A case applied to Pinus pinaster Ait. in Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Clithero, John A., 2018. "Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 61-86.
- Fadong Chen & Urs Fischbacher, 2015. "Cognitive Processes of Distributional Preferences: A Response Time Study," TWI Research Paper Series 101, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Fadong Chen & Urs Fischbacher, 2020. "Cognitive processes underlying distributional preferences: a response time study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 421-446, June.
- Guidon Fenig & Giovanni Gallipoli & Yoram Halevy, 2018.
"Piercing the 'Payoff Function' Veil: Tracing Beliefs and Motives,"
Working Papers
tecipa-619, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Guidon Fenig & Giovanni Gallipoli & Yoram Halevy, 2023. "Piercing the “Payoff Function” Veil: Tracing Beliefs and Motives," Working Paper series 23-02, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
- Guidon Fenig & Giovanni Gallipoli & Yoram Halevy, 2018. "Piercing the "Payoff Function" Veil: Tracing Beliefs and Motives," Working Papers tecipa-625, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Recalde, María P. & Riedl, Arno & Vesterlund, Lise, 2018.
"Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-147.
- Maria P. Recalde & Arno Riedl & Lise Vesterlund, 2014. "Error Prone Inference from Response Time: The Case of Intuitive Generosity in Public Good Times," CESifo Working Paper Series 4987, CESifo.
- Lise Vesterlund, 2015. "Error Prone Inference from Response Time: The Case of Intuitive Generosity in Public-Good Games," Working Paper 5662, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2021.
"Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 558-592, June.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2018. "Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times," ECON - Working Papers 292, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Apr 2019.
- Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2014.
"Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner's dilemma game: Are there brains in games?,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 47-56.
- Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2012. "Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner's dilemma game: Are there brains in games?," MPRA Paper 38825, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Anja Achtziger & Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Alexander Ritschel, 2020. "Cognitive load in economic decisions," ECON - Working Papers 354, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Johannes Lohse & Timo Goeschl & Johannes H. Diederich, 2017. "Giving is a Question of Time: Response Times and Contributions to an Environmental Public Good," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(3), pages 455-477, July.
- Merkel, Anna & Lohse, Johannes, 2016. "Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for the role of subjective utility differences under time pressure," Working Papers 0627, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Clithero, John A., 2018. "Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 344-375.
- Anna Louisa Merkel & Johannes Lohse, 2019.
"Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 24-50, March.
- Merkel, Anna & Lohse, Johannes, 2018. "Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure," Working Papers 0647, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Sean Duffy & J. J. Naddeo & David Owens & John Smith, 2024.
"Cognitive Load and Mixed Strategies: On Brains and Minimax,"
International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(03), pages 1-34, September.
- Duffy, Sean & Naddeo, JJ & Owens, David & Smith, John, 2016. "Cognitive load and mixed strategies: On brains and minimax," MPRA Paper 71878, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Duffy, Sean & Naddeo, JJ & Owens, David & Smith, John, 2016. "Cognitive load and mixed strategies: On brains and minimax," MPRA Paper 89720, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren, 2022.
"Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath,"
Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 591-616, March.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F Shogren, 2016. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01379060, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Post-Print halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F Shogren, 2016. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Working Papers halshs-01379060, HAL.
- Goeschl, Timo & Lohse, Johannes, 2018.
"Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 185-203.
- Goeschl, Timo & Lohse, Johannes, 2016. "Cooperation in Public Good Games. Calculated or Confused?," Working Papers 0626, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Ritschel, Alexander, 2021.
"Multiple behavioral rules in Cournot oligopolies,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 250-267.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Alexander Ritschel, 2019. "Multiple behavioral rules in Cournot oligopolies," ECON - Working Papers 331, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2020.
- Fehr, Dietmar & Sutter, Matthias, 2019.
"Gossip and the efficiency of interactions,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 448-460.
- Dietmar Fehr & Matthias Sutter, 2016. "Gossip and the efficiency of interactions," Working Papers 2016-03, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
- Matthias Sutter & Dietmar Fehr, 2016. "Gossip and the Efficiency of Interactions," Working Papers id:9907, eSocialSciences.
- Fehr, Dietmar & Sutter, Matthias, 2016. "Gossip and the Efficiency of Interactions," IZA Discussion Papers 9704, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Pablo Brañas-Garza & Debrah Meloso & Luis Miller, 2017.
"Strategic risk and response time across games,"
International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 511-523, May.
- Pablo Branas-Garza & Ana Leon-Mejia & Luis M. Miller, 2007. "Response Time under Monetary Incentives: the Ultimatum Game," Jena Economics Research Papers 2007-070, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Pablo Branas-Garza & Debrah Meloso & Luis Miller, 2012. "Interactive and Moral Reasoning: A Comparative Study of Response Times," Working Papers 440, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Pablo Brañas-Garza & Debrah Meloso & Luis M. Miller, 2008. "Instinctive Response in the Ultimatum Game," ThE Papers 08/08, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
- Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Riener, Gerhard & Wollbrant, Conny, 2013.
"Tangible temptation in the social dilemma : cash, cooperation, and self-control,"
Borradores Departamento de Economía
17489, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
- Kristian Ove R. Myrseth & Gerhard Riener & Conny Wollbrant, 2013. "Tangible temptation in the social dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-control," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-13-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
- Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Riener, Gerhard & Wollbrant, Conny, 2013. "Tangible Temptation in the Social Dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-control," Working Papers in Economics 567, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
More about this item
Keywords
Click position; Response time; Social preferences; Experiment;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
- D87 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Neuroeconomics
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:2:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-016-0026-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.