IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i6p529-d238656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Model-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Approach to Robust Job Shop Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Zigao Wu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

  • Shaohua Yu

    (Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France)

  • Tiancheng Li

    (Key Laboratory of Information Fusion Technology (Ministry of Education), School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

Abstract

In the real-world manufacturing system, various uncertain events can occur and disrupt the normal production activities. This paper addresses the multi-objective job shop scheduling problem with random machine breakdowns. As the key of our approach, the robustness of a schedule is considered jointly with the makespan and is defined as expected makespan delay, for which a meta-model is designed by using a data-driven response surface method. Correspondingly, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) is proposed based on the meta-model to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. Extensive experiments based on the job shop benchmark problems are conducted. The results demonstrate that the Pareto solution sets of the MOEA are much better in both convergence and diversity than those of the algorithms based on the existing slack-based surrogate measures. The MOEA is also compared with the algorithm based on Monte Carlo approximation, showing that their Pareto solution sets are close to each other while the MOEA is much more computationally efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Zigao Wu & Shaohua Yu & Tiancheng Li, 2019. "A Meta-Model-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Approach to Robust Job Shop Scheduling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:6:p:529-:d:238656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/6/529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/6/529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. von Hoyningen-Huene, W. & Kiesmüller, G.P., 2015. "Evaluation of the expected makespan of a set of non-resumable jobs on parallel machines with stochastic failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 439-446.
    2. Al-Fawzan, M. A. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2005. "A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 175-187, May.
    3. Selcuk Goren & Ihsan Sabuncuoglu, 2010. "Optimization of schedule robustness and stability under random machine breakdowns and processing time variability," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 203-220.
    4. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    5. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Al-Hinai, Nasr & ElMekkawy, T.Y., 2011. "Robust and stable flexible job shop scheduling with random machine breakdowns using a hybrid genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 279-291, August.
    7. Evgeny Gafarov & Frank Werner, 2019. "Two-Machine Job-Shop Scheduling with Equal Processing Times on Each Machine," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Ali Hosseinabadi & Hajar Siar & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Mohammad Shojafar & Mohd Nasir, 2015. "Using the gravitational emulation local search algorithm to solve the multi-objective flexible dynamic job shop scheduling problem in Small and Medium Enterprises," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 451-474, June.
    9. Fei Luan & Zongyan Cai & Shuqiang Wu & Tianhua Jiang & Fukang Li & Jia Yang, 2019. "Improved Whale Algorithm for Solving the Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, April.
    10. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    11. Jian Xiong & Xu Tan & Ke-wei Yang & Li-ning Xing & Ying-wu Chen, 2012. "A Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach for Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problems," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-27, August.
    12. Jian Zhang & Guofu Ding & Yisheng Zou & Shengfeng Qin & Jianlin Fu, 2019. "Review of job shop scheduling research and its new perspectives under Industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1809-1830, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuri N. Sotskov & Natalja M. Matsveichuk & Vadzim D. Hatsura, 2020. "Schedule Execution for Two-Machine Job-Shop to Minimize Makespan with Uncertain Processing Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-51, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shichang Xiao & Zigao Wu & Hongyan Dui, 2022. "Resilience-Based Surrogate Robustness Measure and Optimization Method for Robust Job-Shop Scheduling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Gabriel Mauricio Zambrano-Rey & Eliana María González-Neira & Gabriel Fernando Forero-Ortiz & María José Ocampo-Monsalve & Andrea Rivera-Torres, 2024. "Minimizing the expected maximum lateness for a job shop subject to stochastic machine breakdowns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 801-833, July.
    4. Che, Ada & Feng, Jianguang & Chen, Haoxun & Chu, Chengbin, 2015. "Robust optimization for the cyclic hoist scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 627-636.
    5. Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Adan, Ivo J.B.F., 2024. "Enhancing stability and robustness in online machine shop scheduling: A multi-agent system and negotiation-based approach for handling machine downtime in industry 4.0," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 569-583.
    6. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Ding, Junwen & Shen, Liji & Tamssaouet, Karim, 2024. "The flexible job shop scheduling problem: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 409-432.
    7. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    8. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    9. Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Mohammad Shojafar & A. Hosseinabadi & Maryam Kardgar & M. Nasir & Rodina Ahmad, 2015. "OSGA: genetic-based open-shop scheduling with consideration of machine maintenance in small and medium enterprises," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 743-758, June.
    10. Tao Ren & Yan Zhang & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu & Meng Zhang & Bo-yu Chang & Xin-yue Wang & Peng Zhao, 2020. "Effective Heuristic Algorithms Solving the Jobshop Scheduling Problem with Release Dates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Ullrich, Christian A., 2013. "Integrated machine scheduling and vehicle routing with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 152-165.
    12. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    13. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2022. "Evaluation of VaR and CVaR for the makespan in interval valued blocking job shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    14. Jose L. Andrade-Pineda & David Canca & Pedro L. Gonzalez-R & M. Calle, 2020. "Scheduling a dual-resource flexible job shop with makespan and due date-related criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 5-35, August.
    15. Chen, Ziyue & Huang, Lizhen, 2021. "Digital twins for information-sharing in remanufacturing supply chain: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Taejong Joo & Hyunyoung Jun & Dongmin Shin, 2022. "Task Allocation in Human–Machine Manufacturing Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Hongbo Li & Zhe Xu & Wenchao Wei, 2018. "Bi-Objective Scheduling Optimization for Discrete Time/Cost Trade-Off in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Lin, B.M.T. & Liu, S.T., 2008. "Maximizing the reward in the relocation problem with generalized due dates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 55-63, September.
    19. Arda, Yasemin & Cattaruzza, Diego & François, Véronique & Ogier, Maxime, 2024. "Home chemotherapy delivery: An integrated production scheduling and multi-trip vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 468-486.
    20. Tien-Fu Liang & Tien-Shou Huang & Ming-Feng Yang, 2012. "Application of fuzzy mathematical programming to imprecise project management decisions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1451-1470, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:6:p:529-:d:238656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.