IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v240y2015i3p627-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust optimization for the cyclic hoist scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Che, Ada
  • Feng, Jianguang
  • Chen, Haoxun
  • Chu, Chengbin

Abstract

This paper deals with the robust optimization for the cyclic hoist scheduling problem with processing time window constraints. The robustness of a cyclic hoist schedule is defined as its ability to remain stable in the presence of perturbations or variations of certain degree in the hoist transportation times. With such a definition, we propose a method to measure the robustness of a cyclic hoist schedule. A bi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model, which aims to optimize cycle time and robustness, is developed for the robust cyclic hoist scheduling problem. We prove that the optimal cycle time is a strictly increasing function of the robustness and the problem has infinite Pareto optimal solutions. Furthermore, we derive the so-called ideal point and nadir point that define the lower and upper bounds for the objective values of Pareto front. A Pareto optimal solution can be obtained by solving a single-objective MILP model to minimize the cycle time for a given value of robustness or maximize the robustness for a specific cycle time. The single-objective MILP models are solved using commercial optimization software CPLEX. Computational results on several benchmark instances and randomly generated instances indicate that the proposed approach can solve large-scale problems within a reasonable amount of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Che, Ada & Feng, Jianguang & Chen, Haoxun & Chu, Chengbin, 2015. "Robust optimization for the cyclic hoist scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 627-636.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:240:y:2015:i:3:p:627-636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714005505
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Briskorn & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo, 2011. "Robust scheduling on a single machine using time buffers," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 383-398.
    2. Kats, Vladimir & Levner, Eugene, 2011. "A faster algorithm for 2-cyclic robotic scheduling with a fixed robot route and interval processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 51-56, February.
    3. Armstrong, Ronald & Lei, Lei & Gu, Shanhong, 1994. "A bounding scheme for deriving the minimal cycle time of a single-transporter N-stage process with time-window constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 130-140, October.
    4. Paul, Henrik J. & Bierwirth, Christian & Kopfer, Herbert, 2007. "A heuristic scheduling procedure for multi-item hoist production lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 54-69, January.
    5. Janny M. Y. Leung & Guoqing Zhang & Xiaoguang Yang & Raymond Mak & Kokin Lam, 2004. "Optimal Cyclic Multi-Hoist Scheduling: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 965-976, December.
    6. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    7. Chauvet, Fabrice & Levner, Eugene & Meyzin, Leonid K. & Proth, Jean-Marie, 2000. "On-line scheduling in a surface treatment system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 382-392, January.
    8. Van de Vonder, Stijn & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 227-240, August.
    9. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    10. Levner, Eugene & Kats, Vladimir & Levit, Vadim E., 1997. "An improved algorithm for cyclic flowshop scheduling in a robotic cell," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 500-508, March.
    11. Al-Hinai, Nasr & ElMekkawy, T.Y., 2011. "Robust and stable flexible job shop scheduling with random machine breakdowns using a hybrid genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 279-291, August.
    12. Zhang, Weihua & Reimann, Marc, 2014. "A simple augmented ∊-constraint method for multi-objective mathematical integer programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 15-24.
    13. Kats, Vladimir & Lei, Lei & Levner, Eugene, 2008. "Minimizing the cycle time of multiple-product processing networks with a fixed operation sequence, setups, and time-window constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1196-1211, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Wu & Junheng Cheng & Feng Chu, 2021. "Large-scale energy-conscious bi-objective single-machine batch scheduling under time-of-use electricity tariffs via effective iterative heuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 471-494, January.
    2. Idir Hamaz & Laurent Houssin & Sonia Cafieri, 2018. "A robust basic cyclic scheduling problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 291-313, September.
    3. Hanen, Claire & Hanzalek, Zdenek, 2020. "Grouping tasks to save energy in a cyclic scheduling problem: A complexity study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 445-459.
    4. Hamaz, Idir & Houssin, Laurent & Cafieri, Sonia, 2024. "The robust cyclic job shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 855-865.
    5. Che, Ada & Kats, Vladimir & Levner, Eugene, 2017. "An efficient bicriteria algorithm for stable robotic flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 964-971.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Li & Richard Y. K. Fung, 2016. "Optimal K-unit cycle scheduling of two-cluster tools with residency constraints and general robot moving times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 165-176, April.
    2. Satya Tamby & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2021. "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 72-85, January.
    3. Zigao Wu & Shaohua Yu & Tiancheng Li, 2019. "A Meta-Model-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Approach to Robust Job Shop Scheduling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    5. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.
    6. Hartillo-Hermoso, María Isabel & Jiménez-Tafur, Haydee & Ucha-Enríquez, José María, 2020. "An exact algebraic ϵ-constraint method for bi-objective linear integer programming based on test sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 453-463.
    7. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Mohammad S. Roni & Sandra D. Eksioglu & Kara G. Cafferty & Jacob J. Jacobson, 2017. "A multi-objective, hub-and-spoke model to design and manage biofuel supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 351-380, February.
    9. Milind Dawande & Michael Pinedo & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2009. "Multiple Part-Type Production in Robotic Cells: Equivalence of Two Real-World Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 210-228, February.
    10. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Ding, Junwen & Shen, Liji & Tamssaouet, Karim, 2024. "The flexible job shop scheduling problem: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 409-432.
    11. Bashir Bashir & Özlem Karsu, 2022. "Solution approaches for equitable multiobjective integer programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 967-995, April.
    12. Shichang Xiao & Zigao Wu & Hongyan Dui, 2022. "Resilience-Based Surrogate Robustness Measure and Optimization Method for Robust Job-Shop Scheduling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    14. Tharanga Rajapakshe & Milind Dawande & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2011. "Quantifying the Impact of Layout on Productivity: An Analysis from Robotic-Cell Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 440-454, April.
    15. Giorgi Tadumadze & Nils Boysen & Simon Emde, 2020. "Robust spotter scheduling in trailer yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 995-1021, December.
    16. Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Adan, Ivo J.B.F., 2024. "Enhancing stability and robustness in online machine shop scheduling: A multi-agent system and negotiation-based approach for handling machine downtime in industry 4.0," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 569-583.
    17. Che, Ada & Chu, Chengbin, 2009. "Multi-degree cyclic scheduling of a no-wait robotic cell with multiple robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 77-88, November.
    18. Janny M. Y. Leung & Guoqing Zhang & Xiaoguang Yang & Raymond Mak & Kokin Lam, 2004. "Optimal Cyclic Multi-Hoist Scheduling: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 965-976, December.
    19. Che, Ada & Kats, Vladimir & Levner, Eugene, 2017. "An efficient bicriteria algorithm for stable robotic flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 964-971.
    20. Che, Ada & Chabrol, Michelle & Gourgand, Michel & Wang, Yuan, 2012. "Scheduling multiple robots in a no-wait re-entrant robotic flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 199-208.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:240:y:2015:i:3:p:627-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.