IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i2p179-d206243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Partial-Consensus Posterior-Aggregation FAHP Method—Supplier Selection Problem as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Cheng Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan)

  • Tin-Chih Toly Chen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University, 1001, University Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

Abstract

Existing fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) methods usually aggregate the fuzzy pairwise comparison results produced by multiple decision-makers (DMs) rather than the fuzzy weights estimations. This is problematic because fuzzy pairwise comparison results are subject to uncertainty and lack consensus. To address this problem, a partial-consensus posterior-aggregation FAHP (PCPA-FAHP) approach is proposed in this study. The PCPA-FAHP approach seeks a partial consensus among most DMs instead of an overall consensus among all DMs, thereby increasing the possibility of reaching a consensus. Subsequently, the aggregation result is defuzzified using the prevalent center-of-gravity method. The PCPA-FAHP approach was applied to a supplier selection problem to validate its effectiveness. According to the experimental results, the PCPA-FAHP approach not only successfully found out the partial consensus among the DMs, but also shrunk the widths of the estimated fuzzy weights to enhance the precision of the FAHP analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Cheng Wang & Tin-Chih Toly Chen, 2019. "A Partial-Consensus Posterior-Aggregation FAHP Method—Supplier Selection Problem as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:179-:d:206243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/2/179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/2/179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forman, Ernest & Peniwati, Kirti, 1998. "Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 165-169, July.
    2. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    3. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    4. Toly Chen, 2013. "Foreign exchange rate forecasting with a virtual-expert partial-consensus fuzzy-neural approach for semiconductor manufacturers in Taiwan," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 73-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Cheng Lin & Yu-Cheng Wang & Tin-Chih Toly Chen & Hai-Fen Lin, 2019. "Evaluating the Suitability of a Smart Technology Application for Fall Detection Using a Fuzzy Collaborative Intelligence Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Shunkun Yu & Yuqing Song, 2022. "Organizational Performance Evaluation of Coal-Fired Power Enterprises Using a Hybrid Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Jun-Kun Lin & Hung-Lung Lin & William Yu Chung Wang & Ching-Hui Chang & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2020. "An Evaluation Model for Property-Purchasing Plans Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Hsin-Chieh Wu & Toly Chen & Chin-Hau Huang, 2020. "A Piecewise Linear FGM Approach for Efficient and Accurate FAHP Analysis: Smart Backpack Design as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Hsin-Chieh Wu & Yu-Cheng Wang & Tin-Chih Toly Chen, 2020. "Assessing and Comparing COVID-19 Intervention Strategies Using a Varying Partial Consensus Fuzzy Collaborative Intelligence Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Hsin-Chieh Wu & Tin-Chih Toly Chen & Chin-Hau Huang & Yun-Cian Shih, 2020. "Comparing Built-in Power Banks for a Smart Backpack Design Using an Auto-Weighting Fuzzy-Weighted-Intersection FAHP Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    2. Alev Taskin Gumus & A. Yesim Yayla & Erkan Çelik & Aytac Yildiz, 2013. "A Combined Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-GRA Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage Method Selection in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Murat İnce & Tuncay Yiğit & Ali Hakan Işik, 2020. "A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-GA Method for Test Sheet Question Selection," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 629-647, April.
    5. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Fanhui Zeng & Xiaozhao Cheng & Jianchun Guo & Liang Tao & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Hybridising Human Judgment, AHP, Grey Theory, and Fuzzy Expert Systems for Candidate Well Selection in Fractured Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Esmer, Soner, 2018. "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 294-304.
    8. Behrooz Noori, 2015. "Prioritizing strategic business units in the face of innovation performance: Combining fuzzy AHP and BSC," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(1), pages 36-56, February.
    9. Behrooz Noori, 2014. "Prioritizing strategic business units in the face of innovation performance: Combining fuzzy AHP and BSC," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0802059, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    10. Guorui Zhang & Enyuan Wang & Zhonghui Li & Ben Qin, 2022. "Risk assessment of coal and gas outburst in driving face based on finite interval cloud model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1969-1995, February.
    11. Ateekh Ur Rehman & Syed Hammad Mian & Usama Umer & Yusuf Siraj Usmani, 2019. "Strategic Outcome Using Fuzzy-AHP-Based Decision Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    13. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Mohamed Rafik Noor Qureshi & Nasser Tairan & AbdulHafeez Mohammad & Asadullah Shaikh & Alhuseen O Alsayed & Asadullah Shah & Fahad Mazaed Alotaibi, 2020. "Evaluating critical success factors in implementing E-learning system using multi-criteria decision-making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Jui-Te Chiang & Chei-Chang Chiou & Shuh-Chyi Doong & I-Fang Chang, 2020. "Research on the Construction of Performance Indicators for the Marketing Alliance of Catering Industry and Credit Card Issuing Banks by Using the Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Nicola Bellantuono & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo & Barbara Scozzi, 2016. "Capturing the Stakeholders’ View in Sustainability Reporting: A Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Kreng, Victor B. & Wu, Chao-Yi, 2007. "Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach: The case of Taiwanese stone industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1795-1810, February.
    17. Pavlović, Boban & Ivezić, Dejan & Živković, Marija, 2021. "Prioritization of strategic measures for strengthening the security of supply of the Serbian natural gas sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    18. BumChoong Kim & Juhan Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2019. "Evaluation Model for Investment in Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Roberto Castaneda & Pilar Arroyo & Lourdes Loza, 2020. "Assessing Countries Sustainability: A Group Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Approach," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 174-174, July.
    20. Ozgur Demirta, 2013. "Evaluating the Best Renewable Energy Technology for Sustainable Energy Plannin," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 3(Special), pages 23-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:179-:d:206243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.