IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i22p3616-d1524536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy AHP and PCA Approach to the Role of Media in Improving Education and the Labor Market in the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Branislav Sančanin

    (The College of Service Business, 71350 Sokolac, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Aleksandra Penjišević

    (Faculty of Economics, Union—Nikola Tesla University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dušan J. Simjanović

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Belgrade Metropolitan University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Branislav M. Ranđelović

    (Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia)

  • Nenad O. Vesić

    (Mathematical Institute of Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Maja Mladenović

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Kosovska Mitrovica, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia)

Abstract

In a hyperproductive interactive environment, where speed and cost-effectiveness often overshadow accuracy, the media’s role is increasingly shifting towards an educational function, beyond its traditional informative and entertaining roles. This shift, particularly through the promotion of science and education, aims to bridge the gap between educational institutions and the labor market. In this context, the importance of 21st-century competencies—encompassing a broad range of knowledge and skills—becomes increasingly clear. Educational institutions are now expected to equip students with relevant, universally applicable, and market-competitive competencies. This paper proposes using a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to rank 21st-century competencies developed throughout the educational process to improve the system. The highest-ranked competency identified is the ability to manage information—specifically, gathering and analyzing information from diverse sources. It has been shown that respondents who developed “soft skills” and media literacy during their studies are better able to critically assess content on social networks and distinguish between credible and false information. The significance of this work lies in its focus on the damaged credibility of online media caused by user-generated content and the rapid spread of unverified and fake news. Denying such discourse or erasing digital traces is therefore futile. Developing a critical approach to information is essential for consistently identifying fake news, doctored images, and recordings taken out of context, as well as preventing their spread.

Suggested Citation

  • Branislav Sančanin & Aleksandra Penjišević & Dušan J. Simjanović & Branislav M. Ranđelović & Nenad O. Vesić & Maja Mladenović, 2024. "A Fuzzy AHP and PCA Approach to the Role of Media in Improving Education and the Labor Market in the 21st Century," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3616-:d:1524536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    2. Eleftheria Papageorgiou & Christos Chronis & Iraklis Varlamis & Yassine Himeur, 2024. "A Survey on the Use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Fake News," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    4. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    5. Ahmad Munir Mohd Salleh & Khatijah Omar & Omar Jaber Aburumman & Nik Hazimah Nik Mat & Mohammad Ayesh Almhairat, 2020. "The impact of career planning and career satisfaction on employee's turnover intention," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 218-232, September.
    6. Wei-Ming Wang & Amy H.I. Lee & Ding-Tsair Chang, 2009. "An integrated FA-FEAHP approach on the social indicators of Taiwan's green building," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 304-316.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Dušan M. Milošević & Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2020. "Implementation of Adjusted Fuzzy AHP Method in the Assessment for Reuse of Industrial Buildings," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    4. Alev Taskin Gumus & A. Yesim Yayla & Erkan Çelik & Aytac Yildiz, 2013. "A Combined Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-GRA Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage Method Selection in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Murat İnce & Tuncay Yiğit & Ali Hakan Işik, 2020. "A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-GA Method for Test Sheet Question Selection," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 629-647, April.
    7. Fanhui Zeng & Xiaozhao Cheng & Jianchun Guo & Liang Tao & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Hybridising Human Judgment, AHP, Grey Theory, and Fuzzy Expert Systems for Candidate Well Selection in Fractured Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Esmer, Soner, 2018. "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 294-304.
    9. Yu-Cheng Wang & Tin-Chih Toly Chen, 2019. "A Partial-Consensus Posterior-Aggregation FAHP Method—Supplier Selection Problem as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Behrooz Noori, 2015. "Prioritizing strategic business units in the face of innovation performance: Combining fuzzy AHP and BSC," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(1), pages 36-56, February.
    11. Behrooz Noori, 2014. "Prioritizing strategic business units in the face of innovation performance: Combining fuzzy AHP and BSC," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0802059, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Guorui Zhang & Enyuan Wang & Zhonghui Li & Ben Qin, 2022. "Risk assessment of coal and gas outburst in driving face based on finite interval cloud model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1969-1995, February.
    13. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Mohamed Rafik Noor Qureshi & Nasser Tairan & AbdulHafeez Mohammad & Asadullah Shaikh & Alhuseen O Alsayed & Asadullah Shah & Fahad Mazaed Alotaibi, 2020. "Evaluating critical success factors in implementing E-learning system using multi-criteria decision-making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Jui-Te Chiang & Chei-Chang Chiou & Shuh-Chyi Doong & I-Fang Chang, 2020. "Research on the Construction of Performance Indicators for the Marketing Alliance of Catering Industry and Credit Card Issuing Banks by Using the Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    15. BumChoong Kim & Juhan Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2019. "Evaluation Model for Investment in Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Ozgur Demirta, 2013. "Evaluating the Best Renewable Energy Technology for Sustainable Energy Plannin," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 3(Special), pages 23-33.
    17. Sahika Ozdemir & Yavuz Ozdemir, 2018. "Prioritizing store plan alternatives produced with shape grammar using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 751-771, July.
    18. Mahak Sharma & Ruchita Gupta & Padmanav Acharya, 2020. "Prioritizing the Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 142-161, February.
    19. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    20. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3616-:d:1524536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.