IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i4p608-d1590026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Resilience of an Urban Rail Transit Network: An Evaluation Approach Based on a Weighted Coupled Map Lattice Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhao Wang

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Jie Liu

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK)

  • Zhouyu Li

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

Modeling cascading failure in an urban rail transit network (URTN) is essential for evaluating the impact of interruptions and network resilience. Here, a weighted coupled map lattice (CML) model is proposed. This model combines structural network coupling and passenger flow coupling to analyze the cascading failure process triggered by a station failure. Four network performance indicators are developed: network efficiency and subgraph connectivity from the network structure perspective, and OD connectivity and the reciprocal of average transfers from the network service perspective. The resilience of a URTN is measured based on the network performance indicators during station failures. Application of the model to the Wuhan URTN showed that station failure with high numbers of boarding and alighting passengers caused the highest decline in network resilience. The network’s structural resilience was stronger than its service resilience. The relationship between the percentage of failed stations and network performance indicated a significant threshold effect at a 5% failure percentage. Specifically, network performance decreased rapidly when the percentage of failed stations was below 5% and more gradually when it exceeded this threshold. Moreover, network performance exhibited high sensitivity to increases in external perturbation intensity when the failure station percentage was below 5%, but this sensitivity diminished significantly once the percentage surpassed 5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhao Wang & Jie Liu & Zhouyu Li, 2025. "The Resilience of an Urban Rail Transit Network: An Evaluation Approach Based on a Weighted Coupled Map Lattice Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:608-:d:1590026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bababeik, Mostafa & Khademi, Navid & Chen, Anthony, 2018. "Increasing the resilience level of a vulnerable rail network: The strategy of location and allocation of emergency relief trains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 110-128.
    2. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    3. Francisco A. Ortega & Miguel A. Pozo & Justo Puerto, 2018. "On-Line Timetable Rescheduling in a Transit Line," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1106-1121, October.
    4. Zhang, X. & Miller-Hooks, E. & Denny, K., 2015. "Assessing the role of network topology in transportation network resilience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 35-45.
    5. Adjetey-Bahun, Kpotissan & Birregah, Babiga & Châtelet, Eric & Planchet, Jean-Luc, 2016. "A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Dunn, Sarah & Wilkinson, Sean M., 2016. "Increasing the resilience of air traffic networks using a network graph theory approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-50.
    7. Zhang, Jianhua & Hu, Funian & Wang, Shuliang & Dai, Yang & Wang, Yixing, 2016. "Structural vulnerability and intervention of high speed railway networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 743-751.
    8. Haonan Ye & Xiao Luo, 2021. "Cascading Failure Analysis on Shanghai Metro Networks: An Improved Coupled Map Lattices Model Based on Graph Attention Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Yi Shen & Gang Ren & Bin Ran, 2021. "Cascading failure analysis and robustness optimization of metro networks based on coupled map lattices: a case study of Nanjing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 537-553, April.
    10. Sun, Lishan & Huang, Yuchen & Chen, Yanyan & Yao, Liya, 2018. "Vulnerability assessment of urban rail transit based on multi-static weighted method in Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 12-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    2. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    3. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    4. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    5. Shen, Yi & Yang, Huang & Ren, Gang & Ran, Bin, 2024. "Model cascading overload failure and dynamic vulnerability analysis of facility network of metro station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Hong, Liu & Zhong, Xin & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of urban residential communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 143-156.
    7. Chan, Ho-Yin & Chen, Anthony & Li, Guoyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Lam, William, 2021. "Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    10. Tang, Junqing & Xu, Lei & Luo, Chunling & Ng, Tsan Sheng Adam, 2021. "Multi-disruption resilience assessment of rail transit systems with optimized commuter flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2021. "Impacts of service feature on vulnerability analysis of high-speed rail network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 238-253.
    12. Zhang, Li & Chen, Tingting & Liu, Zhongshan & Yu, Bin & Wang, Yunpeng, 2024. "Analysis of multi-modal public transportation system performance under metro disruptions: A dynamic resilience assessment framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Malandri, Caterina & Mantecchini, Luca & Postorino, Maria Nadia, 2023. "A comprehensive approach to assess transportation system resilience towards disruptive events. Case study on airside airport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 109-122.
    14. Lu, Bo & Sun, Yue & Wang, Huipo & Wang, Jian-Jun & Shuai Liu, Samuel & Cheng, T.C.E., 2024. "Dynamic resilience analysis of the liner shipping network: From structure to cooperative mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Nan Zhang & Daniel J. Graham & Daniel Hörcher & Prateek Bansal, 2021. "A causal inference approach to measure the vulnerability of urban metro systems," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3269-3300, December.
    16. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Mo, Baichuan & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Zhao, Jinhua, 2022. "Inferring passenger responses to urban rail disruptions using smart card data: A probabilistic framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    19. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Ziqi & Wang, Shuliang & Shao, Wenchao & Zhao, Xun & Liu, Weizhi, 2021. "Vulnerability assessments of weighted urban rail transit networks with integrated coupled map lattices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    20. Lu, Qing-Chang & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Cui, Xin & Li, Jing, 2022. "Modeling network vulnerability of urban rail transit under cascading failures: A Coupled Map Lattices approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:608-:d:1590026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.