IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2024i1p23-d1553159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unsupervised Identification for 2-Additive Capacity by Principal Component Analysis and Kendall’s Correlation Coefficient in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Xueting Guan

    (School of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Kaihong Guo

    (School of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Ran Zhang

    (School of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Xiao Han

    (School of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

Abstract

With the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems becoming increasingly complex, traditional MCDM methods cannot effectively handle ambiguous, incomplete, or uncertain data. While several novel types of MCDM methods have been proposed to address this limitation, they fail to consider the potentially complex interactions among decision criteria. An effective capacity identification methodology is definitely needed to conquer this issue. In this paper, we develop a novel unsupervised method for identifying 2-additive capacities by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Kendall’s correlation coefficient. During the process, some significant results are achieved. Firstly, the Shapley values of decision criteria are derived by using the PCA, through a combination of the variance contribution rate of each Principal Component (PC) and its corresponding eigenvector. Secondly, Kendall’s correlation coefficient stemmed from the decision data created to help identify the Shapley interaction index for each pair of criteria by unsupervised learning. The optimization model equipped with a new form of monotonicity conditions is then established to further determine the optimal Shapley interaction index. With these two kinds of indices, a desired monotone 2-additive capacity is finally identified in an objective and efficient manner. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our proposal can adequately consider the importance of criteria and accurately identify the types of Shapley interaction indices between criteria, and is thus able to produce more convincing and logical results compared with other unsupervised identification methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueting Guan & Kaihong Guo & Ran Zhang & Xiao Han, 2024. "Unsupervised Identification for 2-Additive Capacity by Principal Component Analysis and Kendall’s Correlation Coefficient in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:23-:d:1553159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2004. "Estimation of the weights of interacting criteria from the set of profiles by means of information-theoretic functionals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 741-751, June.
    2. Chateauneuf, Alain & Jaffray, Jean-Yves, 1989. "Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Mobius inversion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 263-283, June.
    3. Pedro Miranda & Michel Grabisch & Pedro Gil, 2002. "p-symmetric fuzzy measures," Post-Print hal-00273960, HAL.
    4. Li Huang & Jian-Zhang Wu & Rui-Jie Xi, 2020. "Nonadditivity Index Based Quasi-Random Generation of Capacities and Its Application in Comprehensive Decision Aiding," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2007. "k-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1453-1468, March.
    6. Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2004. "Tolerant or intolerant character of interacting criteria in aggregation by the Choquet integral," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 771-791, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2007. "Minimum variance capacity identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 498-514, February.
    2. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    3. Pedro Miranda & Michel Grabisch, 2012. "An algorithm for finding the vertices of the k-additive monotone core," Post-Print hal-00806905, HAL.
    4. Jian-Zhang Wu & Yi-Ping Zhou & Li Huang & Jun-Jie Dong, 2019. "Multicriteria Correlation Preference Information (MCCPI)-Based Ordinary Capacity Identification Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Miranda, P. & Combarro, E.F. & Gil, P., 2006. "Extreme points of some families of non-additive measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1865-1884, November.
    6. Grabisch, Michel & Kojadinovic, Ivan & Meyer, Patrick, 2008. "A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 766-785, April.
    7. Fujimoto, Katsushige & Kojadinovic, Ivan & Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2006. "Axiomatic characterizations of probabilistic and cardinal-probabilistic interaction indices," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 72-99, April.
    8. Brice Mayag & Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2009. "A characterization of the 2-additive Choquet integral through cardinal information," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00445132, HAL.
    9. Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2007. "k-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1453-1468, March.
    10. Miranda, Pedro & Grabisch, Michel & Gil, Pedro, 2006. "Dominance of capacities by k-additive belief functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 912-930, December.
    11. Brice Mayag & Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2011. "A representation of preferences by the Choquet integral with respect to a 2-additive capacity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 297-324, September.
    12. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2019. "An Analysis of Winsorized Weighted Means," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 907-933, October.
    13. Milad Moradi & Mahmoud Reza Delavar & Behzad Moshiri, 2017. "A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis model for earthquake vulnerability assessment using Choquet integral and game theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1377-1398, July.
    14. Marcella De Filippo & Delio Colangelo & Luca Farnia, 2017. "Innovation and new business models in tourism," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 149-168.
    15. Li, Jianping & Yao, Xiaoyang & Sun, Xiaolei & Wu, Dengsheng, 2018. "Determining the fuzzy measures in multiple criteria decision aiding from the tolerance perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 428-439.
    16. Lorenza Campagnolo & Carlo Carraro & Fabio Eboli & Luca Farnia & Ramiro Parrado & Roberta Pierfederici, 2018. "The Ex-Ante Evaluation of Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 73-116, February.
    17. Zhao Qiaojiao & Zeng Ling & Liu Jinjin, 2016. "Fuzzy Integral Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Fuzzy Preference Relation on Alternatives," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 280-290, June.
    18. Michel Grabisch, 2015. "Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Recent Developments," Post-Print hal-01302377, HAL.
    19. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    20. Gajdos, T. & Hayashi, T. & Tallon, J.-M. & Vergnaud, J.-C., 2008. "Attitude toward imprecise information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 27-65, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:23-:d:1553159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.