IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i8p1195-d1376879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Tumor Cell Growth Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • José Alberto Rodrigues

    (CIMA and Department of Mathematics of ISEL—Higher Institute of Engineering of Lisbon, Rua Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the applicability and performance of two prominent growth models, namely, the Verhulst model and the Montroll model, in the context of modeling tumor cell growth dynamics. Leveraging the power of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), we aim to assess and compare the predictive capabilities of these models against experimental data obtained from the growth patterns of tumor cells. We employed a dataset comprising detailed measurements of tumor cell growth to train and evaluate the Verhulst and Montroll models. By integrating PINNs, we not only account for experimental noise but also embed physical insights into the learning process, enabling the models to capture the underlying mechanisms governing tumor cell growth. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each growth model in accurately representing tumor cell proliferation dynamics. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the impact of incorporating physics-informed constraints on the model predictions. The insights gained from this comparative analysis contribute to advancing our understanding of growth models and their applications in predicting complex biological phenomena, particularly in the realm of tumor cell proliferation.

Suggested Citation

  • José Alberto Rodrigues, 2024. "Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Tumor Cell Growth Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-9, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1195-:d:1376879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Sirignano & Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, 2017. "DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations," Papers 1708.07469, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina O. F. Williams & Benjamin F. Akers, 2023. "Numerical Simulation of the Korteweg–de Vries Equation with Machine Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. William Lefebvre & Enzo Miller, 2021. "Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution," Working Papers hal-03145949, HAL.
    3. Zhouzhou Gu & Mathieu Lauri`ere & Sebastian Merkel & Jonathan Payne, 2024. "Global Solutions to Master Equations for Continuous Time Heterogeneous Agent Macroeconomic Models," Papers 2406.13726, arXiv.org.
    4. Parand, K. & Aghaei, A.A. & Jani, M. & Ghodsi, A., 2021. "A new approach to the numerical solution of Fredholm integral equations using least squares-support vector regression," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 114-128.
    5. William Lefebvre & Enzo Miller, 2021. "Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution," Papers 2102.09851, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    6. A. Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner & Valentin Tissot-Daguette, 2022. "Deep Stochastic Optimization in Finance," Papers 2205.04604, arXiv.org.
    7. Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "Reinforcement learning and stochastic optimisation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 103-129, January.
    8. Shuaiqiang Liu & Cornelis W. Oosterlee & Sander M. Bohte, 2019. "Pricing Options and Computing Implied Volatilities using Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Bastien Baldacci & Joffrey Derchu & Iuliia Manziuk, 2020. "An approximate solution for options market-making in high dimension," Papers 2009.00907, arXiv.org.
    10. Alexandre Pannier & Cristopher Salvi, 2024. "A path-dependent PDE solver based on signature kernels," Papers 2403.11738, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    11. Rong Du & Duy-Minh Dang, 2023. "Fourier Neural Network Approximation of Transition Densities in Finance," Papers 2309.03966, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    12. Ali Al-Aradi & Adolfo Correia & Danilo de Frietas Naiff & Gabriel Jardim & Yuri Saporito, 2019. "Extensions of the Deep Galerkin Method," Papers 1912.01455, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    13. Yuga Iguchi & Riu Naito & Yusuke Okano & Akihiko Takahashi & Toshihiro Yamada, 2021. "Deep Asymptotic Expansion: Application to Financial Mathematics," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1178, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    14. Martin Hutzenthaler & Arnulf Jentzen & Thomas Kruse & Tuan Anh Nguyen, 2020. "A proof that rectified deep neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of semilinear heat equations," Partial Differential Equations and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-34, April.
    15. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen, 2020. "Pricing and Hedging American-Style Options with Deep Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Salah A. Faroughi & Ramin Soltanmohammadi & Pingki Datta & Seyed Kourosh Mahjour & Shirko Faroughi, 2023. "Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Periodic Activation Functions for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Media," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Jiequn Han & Ruimeng Hu & Jihao Long, 2020. "Convergence of Deep Fictitious Play for Stochastic Differential Games," Papers 2008.05519, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    18. Lukas Gonon, 2024. "Deep neural network expressivity for optimal stopping problems," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 865-910, July.
    19. William Lefebvre & Gr'egoire Loeper & Huy^en Pham, 2022. "Differential learning methods for solving fully nonlinear PDEs," Papers 2205.09815, arXiv.org.
    20. Dehghani, Hamidreza & Zilian, Andreas, 2021. "A hybrid MGA-MSGD ANN training approach for approximate solution of linear elliptic PDEs," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 398-417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1195-:d:1376879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.