IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i7p1100-d1370926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Implied Volatility Surface Using B-Splines with Time-Dependent Coefficients Predicted by Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Zihao Chen

    (Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa, IA 50011, USA)

  • Yuyang Li

    (Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa, IA 50011, USA)

  • Cindy Long Yu

    (Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa, IA 50011, USA)

Abstract

Implied volatility is known to have a string structure (smile curve) for a given time to maturity and can be captured by the B-spline. The parameters characterizing the curves can change over time, which complicates the modeling of the implied volatility surface. Although machine learning models could improve the in-sample fitting, they ignore the structure in common over time and might have poor prediction power. In response to these challenges, we propose a two-step procedure to model the dynamic implied volatility surface (IVS). In the first step, we construct the bivariate tensor-product B-spline (BTPB) basis to approximate cross-sectional structures, under which the surface can be represented by a vector of coefficients. In the second step, we allow for the time-dependent coefficients and model the dynamic coefficients with the tree-based method to provide more flexibility. We show that our approach has better performance than the traditional linear models (parametric models) and the tree-based machine learning methods (nonparametric models). The simulation study confirms that the tensor-product B-spline is able to capture the classical parametric model for IVS given different sample sizes and signal-to-noise ratios. The empirical study shows that our two-step approach outperforms the traditional parametric benchmark, nonparametric benchmark, and parametric benchmark with time-varying coefficients in predicting IVS for the S&P 500 index options in the US market.

Suggested Citation

  • Zihao Chen & Yuyang Li & Cindy Long Yu, 2024. "Modeling Implied Volatility Surface Using B-Splines with Time-Dependent Coefficients Predicted by Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:1100-:d:1370926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/7/1100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/7/1100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiayi Luo & Cindy Long Yu, 2023. "The Application of Symbolic Regression on Identifying Implied Volatility Surface," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Sílvia Gonçalves & Massimo Guidolin, 2006. "Predictable Dynamics in the S&P 500 Index Options Implied Volatility Surface," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(3), pages 1591-1636, May.
    3. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:1:p:407-446 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Heston, Steven L & Nandi, Saikat, 2000. "A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 585-625.
    5. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:2059-2106 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernales, Alejandro & Guidolin, Massimo, 2015. "Learning to smile: Can rational learning explain predictable dynamics in the implied volatility surface?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-37.
    2. Chalamandaris, Georgios & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E., 2010. "Predictable dynamics in implied volatility surfaces from OTC currency options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1175-1188, June.
    3. Bernales, Alejandro & Guidolin, Massimo, 2014. "Can we forecast the implied volatility surface dynamics of equity options? Predictability and economic value tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 326-342.
    4. Le, Van & Zurbruegg, Ralf, 2014. "Forecasting option smile dynamics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 32-45.
    5. Francesco Audrino & Dominik Colagelo, 2007. "Forecasting Implied Volatility Surfaces," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2007 2007-42, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    6. Jiayi Luo & Cindy Long Yu, 2023. "The Application of Symbolic Regression on Identifying Implied Volatility Surface," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Kearney, Fearghal & Shang, Han Lin & Sheenan, Lisa, 2019. "Implied volatility surface predictability: The case of commodity markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    9. Rui Zhou & Johnny Siu-Hang Li & Jeffrey Pai, 2019. "Pricing temperature derivatives with a filtered historical simulation approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(15), pages 1462-1484, October.
    10. Jobst, Andreas A., 2014. "Measuring systemic risk-adjusted liquidity (SRL)—A model approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 270-287.
    11. H. Bertholon & A. Monfort & F. Pegoraro, 2008. "Econometric Asset Pricing Modelling," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 407-458, Fall.
    12. Lars Stentoft, 2008. "American Option Pricing Using GARCH Models and the Normal Inverse Gaussian Distribution," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 540-582, Fall.
    13. Dario Alitab & Giacomo Bormetti & Fulvio Corsi & Adam A. Majewski, 2019. "A realized volatility approach to option pricing with continuous and jump variance components," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 639-664, December.
    14. Christoffersen, Peter & Jacobs, Kris & Chang, Bo Young, 2013. "Forecasting with Option-Implied Information," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 581-656, Elsevier.
    15. Luca Vincenzo Ballestra & Enzo D’Innocenzo & Andrea Guizzardi, 2024. "Score-Driven Modeling with Jumps: An Application to S&P500 Returns and Options," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 375-406.
    16. Henri Bertholon & Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro, 2006. "Pricing and Inference with Mixtures of Conditionally Normal Processes," Working Papers 2006-28, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    17. Mercuri, Lorenzo, 2008. "Option pricing in a Garch model with tempered stable innovations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 172-182, September.
    18. Chalamandaris, Georgios & Rompolis, Leonidas S., 2012. "Exploring the role of the realized return distribution in the formation of the implied volatility smile," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1028-1044.
    19. Monfort, Alain & Pegoraro, Fulvio, 2012. "Asset pricing with Second-Order Esscher Transforms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1678-1687.
    20. Edoardo Berton & Lorenzo Mercuri, 2021. "An Efficient Unified Approach for Spread Option Pricing in a Copula Market Model," Papers 2112.11968, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:1100-:d:1370926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.