IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i22p3497-d1517087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Interpretation of Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Case Study with a Decreasing Number of Criteria and Subjective Approach to Determining Their Importance

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Vavrek

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Municipal activities should not be profitable. Their intention is to provide the highest possible quality of service to citizens and, in this way, contribute to improving their quality of life. For this reason, the evaluation of their performance is very complex and should include several aspects, or criteria. The aim of this study is to quantify the agreement of the financial health assessment of the territorial self-government entities in 2020 with the financial health assessment based on a gradually decreasing number of entry criteria. For this purpose, we use a TOPSIS technique, and a total of 26 combinations of criteria are created with a gradually decreasing number of criteria, i.e., five, four, three, and two criteria used. For a description of the results obtained, we use a wide range of mathematical and statistical methods. The tests used include the Jaccard index, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Levene test, Moran index, and others. Our results confirm the fact that the outcome of MCDM analysis is directly and significantly affected by the structure and number of entry criteria. The reduction in the number of criteria resulted in a change in the parameters of the overall results.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Vavrek, 2024. "Spatial Interpretation of Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Case Study with a Decreasing Number of Criteria and Subjective Approach to Determining Their Importance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3497-:d:1517087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yépez Muñoz, Francisco & Palma Martos, Luis & Pulido Pavón, Noemí, 2021. "Rethinking Andalusia n RIS3 St rategy Design through Regional Benchmarking," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 51, pages 5-30.
    2. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Buyuan & Tao, Yao & Li, Xinying & Chu, Han & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1176-1190.
    3. Roman Vavrek & Eva Kovarova, 2021. "Assessment of the social exclusion at the regional level using multi-criteria approach: evidence from the Czech Republic," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 75-102, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Shuxia Yang & Shengjiang Peng & Xianzhang Ling, 2021. "Discussion on the Feasibility of the Integration of Wind Power and Coal Chemical Industries for Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Gao, Jianwei & Wang, Yaping & Guo, Fengjia & Chen, Jiayi, 2024. "A two-stage decision framework for GIS-based site selection of wind-photovoltaic-hybrid energy storage project using LSGDM method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Xu, Chuanbo & Wu, Yunna & Dai, Shuyu, 2020. "What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Roman Vavrek & Jana Chovancová, 2020. "Energy Performance of the European Union Countries in Terms of Reaching the European Energy Union Objectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Wu, Yunna & Liu, Fangtong & Wu, Junhao & He, Jiaming & Xu, Minjia & Zhou, Jianli, 2022. "Barrier identification and analysis framework to the development of offshore wind-to-hydrogen projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    10. Zhao, Chengxuan & Yang, Xiao & Yu, Jie & Yang, Minghan & Wang, Jianye & Chen, Shuai, 2023. "Interval type-2 fuzzy logic control for a space nuclear reactor core power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    11. Zhang, Lihui & Zhao, Zhenli & Yang, Meng & Li, Songrui, 2020. "A multi-criteria decision method for performance evaluation of public charging service quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Qin, Guangyu & Zhang, Meijuan & Yan, Qingyou & Xu, Chuanbo & Kammen, Daniel M., 2021. "Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Marta Ewa Kuc-Czarnecka & Magdalena Olczyk & Marek Zinecker, 2021. "Improvements and Spatial Dependencies in Energy Transition Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Zhendong & Li, Lingfei & Ji, Pengli & Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Zhongliang, 2021. "Sustainable development evaluation on wind power compressed air energy storage projects based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1189.
    15. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar, 2020. "Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Covrig Mihaela & Goia Agoston Simona Irina & Igreţ Ramona Ştefania & Marinaş Cristian Virgil & Olariu Ana Alexandra & Roman Monica, 2022. "Discovering the tutors’ perspective on the quality of internship programs in a pandemic context," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 306-327, September.
    17. Dinulescu Ruxandra & Dobrin Cosmin, 2022. "Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 15-40, March.
    18. Zhao, Tian & Liu, Zhixin & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "Developing hydrogen refueling stations: An evolutionary game approach and the case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Ramakrishnan, Shanmugam & Delpisheh, Mostafa & Convery, Caillean & Niblett, Daniel & Vinothkannan, Mohanraj & Mamlouk, Mohamed, 2024. "Offshore green hydrogen production from wind energy: Critical review and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Zhang, Lihui & Li, Songrui & Nie, Qingyun & Hu, Yitang, 2022. "A two-stage benefit optimization and multi-participant benefit-sharing strategy for hybrid renewable energy systems in rural areas under carbon trading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 744-761.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3497-:d:1517087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.