IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i19p2987-d1485723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium Strategies for Overtaking-Free Queueing Networks under Partial Information

Author

Listed:
  • David Barbato

    (Department of Mathematics “Tullio-Levi Civita”, University of Padua, Via Trieste, 63, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Alberto Cesaro

    (Reply S.p.A., Via Avogadri, 2, 31057 Silea, Italy)

  • Bernardo D’Auria

    (Department of Mathematics “Tullio-Levi Civita”, University of Padua, Via Trieste, 63, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

We investigate the equilibrium strategies for customers arriving at overtaking-free queueing networks and receiving partial information about the system’s state. In an overtaking-free network, customers cannot be overtaken by others arriving after them. We assume that customer arrivals follow a Poisson process and that service times at any queue are independent and exponentially distributed. Upon arrival, the received partial information is the total number of customers already in the network; however, the distribution of these among the queues is left unknown. Adding rewards for being served and costs for waiting, we analyze the economic behavior of this system, looking for equilibrium threshold strategies. The overtaking-free characteristic allows for coupling of its dynamics with those of corresponding closed Jackson networks, for which an algorithm to compute the expected sojourn times is known. We exploit this feature to compute the profit function and prove the existence of equilibrium threshold strategies. We also illustrate the results by analyzing and comparing two simple network structures.

Suggested Citation

  • David Barbato & Alberto Cesaro & Bernardo D’Auria, 2024. "Equilibrium Strategies for Overtaking-Free Queueing Networks under Partial Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:2987-:d:1485723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/2987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/2987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. Adiri & U. Yechiali, 1974. "Optimal Priority-Purchasing and Pricing Decisions in Nonmonopoly and Monopoly Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1051-1066, October.
    2. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    3. Bountali, Olga & Economou, Antonis, 2017. "Equilibrium joining strategies in batch service queueing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1142-1151.
    4. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Equilibrium threshold joining strategies in partially observable batch service queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 231-253, June.
    5. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    6. Ping Cao & Yaolei Wang & Jingui Xie, 2019. "Priority Service Pricing with Heterogeneous Customers: Impact of Delay Cost Distribution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(11), pages 2854-2876, November.
    7. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    8. Srinagesh Gavirneni & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2016. "Self-Selecting Priority Queues with Burr Distributed Waiting Costs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 979-992, June.
    9. Ronald W. Wolff, 1982. "Poisson Arrivals See Time Averages," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 223-231, April.
    10. Zhao, Chen & Wang, Zhongbin, 2023. "The impact of line-sitting on a two-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 782-800.
    11. Ali K. Parlaktürk & Sunil Kumar, 2004. "Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 949-966, July.
    12. Parlakturk, Ali & Kumar, Sunil, 2004. "Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks," Research Papers 1782r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Equilibrium threshold joining strategies in partially observable batch service queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 231-253, June.
    2. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    3. Zhao, Chen & Wang, Zhongbin, 2023. "The impact of line-sitting on a two-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 782-800.
    4. Alessandro Arlotto & Andrew E. Frazelle & Yehua Wei, 2019. "Strategic Open Routing in Service Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 735-750, February.
    5. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    6. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    7. Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang, 2020. "The Economics of Line-Sitting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 227-242, January.
    8. Zhongbin Wang & Yunan Liu & Lei Fang, 2022. "Pay to activate service in vacation queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2609-2627, June.
    9. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Strategic customer behavior in a two-stage batch processing system," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 3-29, October.
    10. İşlier, Zeynep Gökçe & Güllü, Refik, 2024. "On strategic customers with correlated utility attributes: Effects and information benefits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 258-269.
    11. Shiliang Cui & Xuanming Su & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "A Model of Rational Retrials in Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1699-1718, November.
    12. Hassin, Refael & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2018. "Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1014-1026.
    13. Olga Boudali & Antonis Economou, 2013. "The effect of catastrophes on the strategic customer behavior in queueing systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(7), pages 571-587, October.
    14. Hassin, Refael & Haviv, Moshe & Oz, Binyamin, 2023. "Strategic behavior in queues with arrival rate uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 217-224.
    15. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Incentives for Quality Through Endogenous Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 254-273, July.
    16. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Queueing systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    17. Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2013. "Equilibrium balking strategies for a clearing queueing system in alternating environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 489-514, September.
    18. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    19. Roei Engel & Refael Hassin, 2017. "Customer equilibrium in a single-server system with virtual and system queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 161-180, October.
    20. Feray Tunçalp & Lerzan Örmeci & Evrim D. Güneş, 2024. "Capacity allocation in a two-channel service system from a social planner’s perspective," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 185-213, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:2987-:d:1485723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.