IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v267y2018i3p1075-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the impact of information disclosure on advance reservations: A game-theoretic view

Author

Listed:
  • Simhon, Eran
  • Starobinski, David

Abstract

In many branches of the economy, customers can reserve resources in advance. Yet, service providers often differ in the information they disclose to customers. In this paper, we evaluate how information about server availability impacts the strategic behavior of customers in a loss system with N servers, where each customer can either reserve a server at a certain cost, or take the risk of finding no server available. We formulate the problem as a non-cooperative game with a random number of players. Our main contributions are to establish the existence, structure, and uniqueness (or lack thereof) of pure Nash equilibria, depending on the information disclosed to customers. Specifically, we first prove that if the number of available servers is always disclosed, then there exists exactly one pure Nash equilibrium. High reservation costs lead to an equilibrium in which all servers remain unreserved, while low reservation costs lead to an equilibrium that consists of N “time-thresholds.” A customer that observes n available servers, makes a reservation only if she makes her inquiry before the nth time-threshold. Next, we consider the case where the number of available servers is disclosed only when that number falls below a certain threshold. We show that, in this game, the same types of equilibria prevail. However, multiple Nash equilibria may exist. Finally, we numerically compare the performance of the different policies and we formulate the conjecture that it is preferable for a provider to hide information about the number of available servers.

Suggested Citation

  • Simhon, Eran & Starobinski, David, 2018. "On the impact of information disclosure on advance reservations: A game-theoretic view," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1075-1088.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:267:y:2018:i:3:p:1075-1088
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717311426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaspi, Mor & Raviv, Tal & Tzur, Michal & Galili, Hila, 2016. "Regulating vehicle sharing systems through parking reservation policies: Analysis and performance bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 969-987.
    2. Qian Liu & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 2008. "Strategic Capacity Rationing to Induce Early Purchases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1115-1131, June.
    3. Javad Nasiry & Ioana Popescu, 2012. "Advance Selling When Consumers Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1160-1177, June.
    4. Milchtaich, Igal, 2004. "Random-player games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 353-388, May.
    5. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    6. Varda Liberman & Uri Yechiali, 1978. "On the Hotel Overbooking Problem--An Inventory System with Stochastic Cancellations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(11), pages 1117-1126, July.
    7. Martin I. Reiman & Qiong Wang, 2008. "An Asymptotically Optimal Policy for a Quantity-Based Network Revenue Management Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 257-282, May.
    8. Guillermo Gallego & Özalp Özer, 2001. "Integrating Replenishment Decisions with Advance Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1344-1360, October.
    9. Rui Yin & Yossi Aviv & Amit Pazgal & Christopher S. Tang, 2009. "Optimal Markdown Pricing: Implications of Inventory Display Formats in the Presence of Strategic Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(8), pages 1391-1408, August.
    10. Jean-Philippe Gayon & Saif Benjaafar & Francis de Véricourt, 2009. "Using Imperfect Advance Demand Information in Production-Inventory Systems with Multiple Customer Classes," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 128-143, July.
    11. Dimitris Bertsimas & Romy Shioda, 2003. "Restaurant Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 472-486, June.
    12. Roger B. Myerson, 1998. "Population uncertainty and Poisson games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 27(3), pages 375-392.
    13. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    14. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    15. Du, Bisheng & Larsen, Christian, 2017. "Reservation policies of advance orders in the presence of multiple demand classes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 430-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chamberlain, Jonathan & Simhon, Eran & Starobinski, David, 2021. "Preemptible queues with advance reservations: Strategic behavior and revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 561-578.
    2. Lu, Shibao & Lian, Zhiduan & Sun, Huaping & Wu, Xiaohe & Bai, Xiao & Wang, Congcong, 2021. "Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chamberlain, Jonathan & Simhon, Eran & Starobinski, David, 2021. "Preemptible queues with advance reservations: Strategic behavior and revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 561-578.
    2. Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2013. "Equilibrium balking strategies for a clearing queueing system in alternating environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 489-514, September.
    3. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Equilibrium threshold joining strategies in partially observable batch service queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 231-253, June.
    4. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    5. Olga Bountali & Apostolos Burnetas & Lerzan Örmeci, 2022. "Join, balk, or jettison? The effect of flexibility and ranking knowledge in systems with batch arrivals," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3505-3524, September.
    6. Gérard P. Cachon & Pnina Feldman, 2015. "Price Commitments with Strategic Consumers: Why It Can Be Optimal to Discount More Frequently … Than Optimal," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 399-410, July.
    7. Czerny, Achim I. & Guo, Pengfei & Hassin, Refael, 2022. "Shall firms withhold exact waiting time information from their customers? A transport example," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 128-142.
    8. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Strategic customer behavior in a two-stage batch processing system," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 3-29, October.
    9. Apostolos Burnetas & Antonis Economou & George Vasiliadis, 2017. "Strategic customer behavior in a queueing system with delayed observations," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 389-418, August.
    10. Dror Hermel & Benny Mantin, 2018. "Selling to strategic consumers: on the benefits of consumers’ valuation uncertainty and abundant inventory," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(3), pages 146-165, June.
    11. Lian, Zhaotong & Gu, Xinhua & Wu, Jinbiao, 2016. "A re-examination of experience service offering and regular service pricing under profit maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 907-915.
    12. Alım, Muzaffer & Beullens, Patrick, 2022. "Improving inventory system performance by selective purchasing of buyers’ willingness to wait," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 124-136.
    13. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Yoav Kerner, 2013. "Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 492-506, July.
    14. Shone, Rob & Knight, Vincent A. & Williams, Janet E., 2013. "Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 133-141.
    15. Cuihong Li & Fuqiang Zhang, 2013. "Advance Demand Information, Price Discrimination, and Preorder Strategies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 57-71, September.
    16. Kraig Delana & Nicos Savva & Tolga Tezcan, 2021. "Proactive Customer Service: Operational Benefits and Economic Frictions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 70-87, 1-2.
    17. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Queueing systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    18. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    19. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    20. Sun, Ke, 2024. "Strategic responses to the aggregator platform: Pricing and information sharing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:267:y:2018:i:3:p:1075-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.