IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i15p2372-d1446267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Quantum Neural Network Approaches to Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Avramouli

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, GAIOPOLIS, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Ilias K. Savvas

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, GAIOPOLIS, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Anna Vasilaki

    (Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Andreas Tsipourlianos

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, GAIOPOLIS, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Georgia Garani

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, GAIOPOLIS, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

Abstract

Drug repositioning is a less expensive and time-consuming method than the traditional method of drug discovery. It is a strategy for identifying new uses for approved or investigational drugs that are outside the scope of the original medical indication. A key strategy in repositioning approved or investigational drugs is determining the binding affinity of these drugs to target proteins. The large increase in available experimental data has helped deep learning methods to demonstrate superior performance compared to conventional prediction and other traditional computational methods in precise binding affinity prediction. However, these methods are complex and time-consuming, presenting a significant barrier to their development and practical application. In this context, quantum computing (QC) and quantum machine learning (QML) theoretically offer promising solutions to effectively address these challenges. In this work, we introduce a hybrid quantum–classical framework to predict binding affinity. Our approach involves, initially, the implementation of an efficient classical model using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for feature extraction and three fully connected layers for prediction. Subsequently, retaining the classical module for feature extraction, we implement various quantum and classical modules for binding affinity prediction, which accept the concatenated features as input. Quantum predicted modules are implemented with Variational Quantum Regressions (VQRs), while classical predicted modules are implemented with various fully connected layers. Our findings clearly show that hybrid quantum–classical models accelerate the training process in terms of epochs and achieve faster stabilization. Also, these models demonstrate quantum superiority in terms of complexity, accuracy, and generalization, thereby indicating a promising direction for QML.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Avramouli & Ilias K. Savvas & Anna Vasilaki & Andreas Tsipourlianos & Georgia Garani, 2024. "Hybrid Quantum Neural Network Approaches to Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:15:p:2372-:d:1446267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/15/2372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/15/2372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Biamonte & Peter Wittek & Nicola Pancotti & Patrick Rebentrost & Nathan Wiebe & Seth Lloyd, 2017. "Quantum machine learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 549(7671), pages 195-202, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    2. Xinbiao Wang & Yuxuan Du & Zhuozhuo Tu & Yong Luo & Xiao Yuan & Dacheng Tao, 2024. "Transition role of entangled data in quantum machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Ajagekar, Akshay & You, Fengqi, 2021. "Quantum computing based hybrid deep learning for fault diagnosis in electrical power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Jurgita Bruneckiene & Robertas Jucevicius & Ineta Zykiene & Jonas Rapsikevicius & Mantas Lukauskas, 2019. "Assessment of Investment Attractiveness in European Countries by Artificial Neural Networks: What Competences are Needed to Make a Decision on Collective Well-Being?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Nikolaos Schetakis & Davit Aghamalyan & Michael Boguslavsky & Agnieszka Rees & Marc Rakotomalala & Paul Robert Griffin, 2024. "Quantum Machine Learning for Credit Scoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Li, Nianqiao & Yan, Fei & Hirota, Kaoru, 2022. "Quantum data visualization: A quantum computing framework for enhancing visual analysis of data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    7. Cambyse Rouzé & Daniel Stilck França & Emilio Onorati & James D. Watson, 2024. "Efficient learning of ground and thermal states within phases of matter," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Elies Gil-Fuster & Jens Eisert & Carlos Bravo-Prieto, 2024. "Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Guo, Mingchao & Liu, Hailing & Li, Yongmei & Li, Wenmin & Gao, Fei & Qin, Sujuan & Wen, Qiaoyan, 2022. "Quantum algorithms for anomaly detection using amplitude estimation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    10. Vicente Moret-Bonillo & Samuel Magaz-Romero & Eduardo Mosqueira-Rey, 2022. "Quantum Computing for Dealing with Inaccurate Knowledge Related to the Certainty Factors Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Gong, Li-Hua & Xiang, Ling-Zhi & Liu, Si-Hang & Zhou, Nan-Run, 2022. "Born machine model based on matrix product state quantum circuit," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    12. Laura Böhm & Sebastian Kolb & Thomas Plankenbühler & Jonas Miederer & Simon Markthaler & Jürgen Karl, 2023. "Short-Term Natural Gas and Carbon Price Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Serena Di Giorgio & Paulo Mateus, 2021. "On the Complexity of Finding the Maximum Entropy Compatible Quantum State," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sachin Kamble & Shivam Gupta & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2023. "Adoption of Artificial Intelligence and Cutting-Edge Technologies for Production System Sustainability: A Moderator-Mediation Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1779-1794, October.
    15. Junyu Liu & Minzhao Liu & Jin-Peng Liu & Ziyu Ye & Yunfei Wang & Yuri Alexeev & Jens Eisert & Liang Jiang, 2024. "Towards provably efficient quantum algorithms for large-scale machine-learning models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    16. Alen Senanian & Sridhar Prabhu & Vladimir Kremenetski & Saswata Roy & Yingkang Cao & Jeremy Kline & Tatsuhiro Onodera & Logan G. Wright & Xiaodi Wu & Valla Fatemi & Peter L. McMahon, 2024. "Microwave signal processing using an analog quantum reservoir computer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Matthias C. Caro & Hsin-Yuan Huang & M. Cerezo & Kunal Sharma & Andrew Sornborger & Lukasz Cincio & Patrick J. Coles, 2022. "Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Wang, Shaoxuan & Shen, Yingtong & Liu, Xinjian & Zhang, Haoying & Wang, Yukun, 2024. "Variational quantum entanglement classification discrimination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).
    19. Ojas Parekh, 2023. "Synergies Between Operations Research and Quantum Information Science," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 266-273, March.
    20. Sofiene Jerbi & Lukas J. Fiderer & Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup & Jonas M. Kübler & Hans J. Briegel & Vedran Dunjko, 2023. "Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:15:p:2372-:d:1446267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.