IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2023i1p17-d1304332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Approaches to Estimate the Shapley Value for Convex Partially Defined Games

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Masuya

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Daito Bunka University, 1-9-1, Takashimadaira, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 175-8571, Japan)

Abstract

In the classical approach of von Neumann and Morgenstern to cooperative games, it was assumed that the worth of all coalitions must be given. However, in real-world problems, the worth of some coalitions may be unknown. Therefore, in this study, we consider the Shapley value for convex partially defined games using two approaches. Firstly, we introduce a polytope that includes the set of Shapley values that can be obtained from a given convex partially defined game and select one rational value in some sense from the set. The elements of this polytope are said to be the Shapley payoff vectors. Secondly, we obtain the set of Shapley values that can be obtained from a given convex partially defined game and select one rational value in some sense from the set. Moreover, we axiomatize the proposed two values.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Masuya, 2023. "Two Approaches to Estimate the Shapley Value for Convex Partially Defined Games," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:17-:d:1304332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehrer, E, 1988. "An Axiomatization of the Banzhaf Value," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 17(2), pages 89-99.
    2. David Housman, 2002. "Linear and symmetric allocation methods for partially defined cooperative games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(3), pages 377-404.
    3. M. Josune Albizuri & Satoshi Masuya & José M. Zarzuelo, 2022. "Characterization of a value for games under restricted cooperation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 773-785, November.
    4. Willson, Stephen J, 1993. "A Value for Partially Defined Cooperative Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(4), pages 371-384.
    5. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Satoshi Masuya & Masahiro Inuiguchi, 2016. "A fundamental study for partially defined cooperative games," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 281-306, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Bok & Martin Černý, 2024. "1-convex extensions of incomplete cooperative games and the average value," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 239-268, March.
    2. Martin Černý & Jan Bok & David Hartman & Milan Hladík, 2024. "Positivity and convexity in incomplete cooperative games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(2), pages 785-809, September.
    3. Satoshi Masuya & Masahiro Inuiguchi, 2016. "A fundamental study for partially defined cooperative games," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 281-306, September.
    4. Martin Cerny & Michel Grabisch, 2023. "Player-centered incomplete cooperative games," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 23006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Peter Knudsen & Lars Østerdal, 2012. "Merging and splitting in cooperative games: some (im)possibility results," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 763-774, November.
    6. Pérez-Castrillo, David & Sun, Chaoran, 2021. "Value-free reductions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 543-568.
    7. Palestini, Arsen & Pignataro, Giuseppe, 2016. "A graph-based approach to inequality assessment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 455(C), pages 65-78.
    8. Robert P. Gilles & Lina Mallozzi, 2022. "Gately Values of Cooperative Games," Papers 2208.10189, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    9. Bendel, Dan & Haviv, Moshe, 2018. "Cooperation and sharing costs in a tandem queueing network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 926-933.
    10. Artyom Jelnov & Yair Tauman, 2014. "Voting power and proportional representation of voters," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(4), pages 747-766, November.
    11. Tobias Hiller, 2013. "The distribution of power in governing coalitions of the German Laender," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1155-1159, August.
    12. McQuillin, Ben & Sugden, Robert, 2018. "Balanced externalities and the Shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 81-92.
    13. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    14. Sylvain Béal & Amandine Ghintran & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "The sequential equal surplus division for rooted forest games and an application to sharing a river with bifurcations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 251-283, September.
    15. Gianfranco Gambarelli, 1999. "Maximax Apportionments," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(6), pages 441-461, November.
    16. H. Andrew Michener & Daniel J. Myers, 1998. "Probabilistic Coalition Structure Theories," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 830-860, December.
    17. Gonzalez, Stéphane & Rostom, Fatma Zahra, 2022. "Sharing the global outcomes of finite natural resource exploitation: A dynamic coalitional stability perspective," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Camelia Bejan & Juan Gómez, 2012. "Axiomatizing core extensions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 885-898, November.
    19. Zaporozhets, Vera & García-Valiñas, María & Kurz, Sascha, 2016. "Key drivers of EU budget allocation: Does power matter?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 57-70.
    20. Maria Montero & Alex Possajennikov, 2021. "An Adaptive Model of Demand Adjustment in Weighted Majority Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:17-:d:1304332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.