IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i20p4262-d1258425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proactive Coordination of Traffic Guidance and Signal Control for a Divergent Network

Author

Listed:
  • Yaming Guo

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Ke Zhang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Xiqun Chen

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Meng Li

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

In the realm of transportation system optimization, enhancing overall performance through the proactive coordination of traffic guidance and signal control in a divergent network can tackle the challenges posed by traffic congestion and inefficiency. Thus, we propose an innovative approach to first allow the information on variable message signs (VMS) that deviates from estimated travel times. This proactive approach guides drivers towards optimal routes from a system-wide perspective, such as minimizing vehicle hours traveled. The deviation is constrained both by the lower bound of drivers’ long-term compliance rate and the upper bound of the favored traffic signal operation. The proposed approach coordinates the traffic guidance system with the signal control system. The traffic signal control system sets the upper limit for information deviation in the traffic guidance system, while the traffic guidance system provides demand predictions for the traffic signal control system. Overall, the objective function of the approach is the network-level performance of all users. We gauge traveler satisfaction as a measure of system credibility, using both a route choice module and a satisfaction degree module established through stated preference surveys. Numerical results demonstrate that proactive-coordinated (PC) strategies outperform reactive-coordinated (RC), proactive-independent (PI), and reactive-independent (RI) strategies by improving the system performance, meanwhile keeping the system trustworthy. Under the normal traffic scenario, the PC strategy reduces total travel time by approximately 10%. Driver satisfaction with the PC strategy increases from a baseline of 76% to 95%. Moreover, in scenarios with sudden changes in either traffic demand or supply, e.g., accidents or large events, the proactive guidance strategy is more flexible and can potentially improve more from the system perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaming Guo & Ke Zhang & Xiqun Chen & Meng Li, 2023. "Proactive Coordination of Traffic Guidance and Signal Control for a Divergent Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4262-:d:1258425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poulopoulou, Maria & Spyropoulou, Ioanna, 2019. "Active traffic management in urban areas: Is it effective for professional drivers? The case of variable message signs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 412-423.
    2. Laurens Bliek, 2022. "A Survey on Sustainable Surrogate-Based Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Binshuang Zheng & Zhengqiang Hong & Junyao Tang & Meiling Han & Jiaying Chen & Xiaoming Huang, 2023. "A Comprehensive Method to Evaluate Ride Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles under Typical Braking Scenarios: Testing, Simulation and Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Boriana Vatchova & Yordanka Boneva, 2023. "Design of Fuzzy and Conventional Controllers for Modeling and Simulation of Urban Traffic Light System with Feedback Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Lo, Hong K. & Tung, Yeou-Koung, 2003. "Network with degradable links: capacity analysis and design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 345-363, May.
    6. Yin, Yafeng & Yang, Hai, 2003. "Simultaneous determination of the equilibrium market penetration and compliance rate of advanced traveler information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 165-181, February.
    7. Huang, Ruqing & Han, Lee D. & Huang, Zhongxiang, 2022. "A new network equilibrium flow model: User-equilibrium with quantity adjustment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Rodriguez-Roman, Daniel & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2020. "Surrogate-based optimization for multi-objective toll design problems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 485-503.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Zhong & Lixin Miao, 2024. "Reliability-Based Mixed Traffic Equilibrium Problem Under Endogenous Market Penetration of Connected Autonomous Vehicles and Uncertainty in Supply," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 461-505, June.
    2. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    4. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Watling, David P., 2015. "On multi-objective stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 704-717.
    5. Jie, Ke-Wei & Liu, San-Yang & Sun, Xiao-Jun & Xu, Yun-Cheng, 2023. "A dynamic ripple-spreading algorithm for solving mean–variance of shortest path model in uncertain random networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Han, Linghui & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Zhu, Chengjuan, 2011. "Day-to-day evolution of the traffic network with Advanced Traveler Information System," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 914-919.
    7. Li, Manzi & Jiang, Gege & Lo, Hong K., 2022. "Pricing strategy of ride-sourcing services under travel time variability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Tan, Zhijia & Yang, Hai & Tan, Wei & Li, Zhichun, 2016. "Pareto-improving transportation network design and ownership regimes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 292-309.
    9. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Jian & Wu, Yunchi, 2023. "A novel flow update policy in solving traffic assignment problems: Successive over relaxation iteration method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Michael W. Levin & Melissa Duell & S. Travis Waller, 2020. "Arrival Time Reliability in Strategic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 803-831, September.
    11. Guohui Zhang & Zhong Wang & Khali Persad & C. Walton, 2014. "Enhanced traffic information dissemination to facilitate toll road utilization: a nested logit model of a stated preference survey in Texas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 231-249, March.
    12. Zhu, Zheng & Li, Xinwei & Liu, Wei & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Day-to-day evolution of departure time choice in stochastic capacity bottleneck models with bounded rationality and various information perceptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-192.
    13. Sun, Chenshuo & Pei, Xin & Hao, Junheng & Wang, Yewen & Zhang, Zuo & Wong, S.C., 2018. "Role of road network features in the evaluation of incident impacts on urban traffic mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 101-116.
    14. Karimi-Mamaghan, Maryam & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Pirayesh, Amir & Karimi-Mamaghan, Amir Mohammad & Irani, Hassan, 2020. "Hub-and-spoke network design under congestion: A learning based metaheuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    15. Piet Rietveld, 2011. "The Economics of Information in Transport," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 24, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Wang, Judith Y.T. & Ehrgott, Matthias & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "A bi-objective user equilibrium model of travel time reliability in a road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 4-15.
    17. Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2019. "Reliable single-allocation hub location problem with disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 90-120.
    18. Chen-Yang Yan & Mao-Bin Hu & Rui Jiang & Jiancheng Long & Jin-Yong Chen & Hao-Xiang Liu, 2019. "Stochastic Ridesharing User Equilibrium in Transport Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1007-1030, December.
    19. Khani, Alireza & Boyles, Stephen D., 2015. "An exact algorithm for the mean–standard deviation shortest path problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 252-266.
    20. Zhu, Zheng & Mardan, Atabak & Zhu, Shanjiang & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Capturing the interaction between travel time reliability and route choice behavior based on the generalized Bayesian traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 48-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4262-:d:1258425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.