IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i14p3192-d1198792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Cigarette Consumption of Poor Households Using Penalized Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression with Minimax Concave Penalty

Author

Listed:
  • Yudhie Andriyana

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Rinda Fitriani

    (National Bureau of Statistics of Blitar Municipality, Blitar 66137, Indonesia)

  • Bertho Tantular

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Neneng Sunengsih

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Kurnia Wahyudi

    (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Annisa Nur Falah

    (Doctoral Program of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

The cigarette commodity is the second largest contributor to the food poverty line. Several aspects imply that poor people consume cigarettes despite having a minimal income. In this study, we are interested in investigating factors influencing poor people to be active smokers. Since the consumption number is a set of count data with zero excess, we have an overdispersion problem. This implies that a standard Poisson regression technique cannot be implemented. On the other hand, the factors involved in the model need to be selected simultaneously. Therefore, we propose to use a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression with a minimax concave penalty (MCP) to determine the dominant factors influencing cigarette consumption in poor households. The data used in this study were microdata from the National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS) conducted in March 2019 in East Java Province, Indonesia. The result shows that poor households with a male head of household, having no education, working in the informal sector, having many adult household members, and receiving social assistance tend to consume more cigarettes than others. Additionally, cigarette consumption decreases with the increasing age of the head of household.

Suggested Citation

  • Yudhie Andriyana & Rinda Fitriani & Bertho Tantular & Neneng Sunengsih & Kurnia Wahyudi & I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya & Annisa Nur Falah, 2023. "Modeling the Cigarette Consumption of Poor Households Using Penalized Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression with Minimax Concave Penalty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3192-:d:1198792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron,A. Colin & Trivedi,Pravin K., 2013. "Regression Analysis of Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107667273, September.
    2. Robert Tibshirani, 2011. "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(3), pages 273-282, June.
    3. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    4. Pampel, Fred, 2008. "Tobacco use in sub-Sahara Africa: Estimates from the demographic health surveys," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1772-1783, April.
    5. Abhijeet R Patil & Sangjin Kim, 2020. "Combination of Ensembles of Regularized Regression Models with Resampling-Based Lasso Feature Selection in High Dimensional Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Kyung Im Kang & Kyonghwa Kang & Chanhee Kim, 2021. "Risk Factors Influencing Cyberbullying Perpetration among Middle School Students in Korea: Analysis Using the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    2. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Lee Anthony & Caron Francois & Doucet Arnaud & Holmes Chris, 2012. "Bayesian Sparsity-Path-Analysis of Genetic Association Signal using Generalized t Priors," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, January.
    4. Sokbae Lee & Myung Hwan Seo & Youngki Shin, 2016. "The lasso for high dimensional regression with a possible change point," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 193-210, January.
    5. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Okhrin, Ostap & Ristig, Alexander, 2014. "Efficient iterative maximum likelihood estimation of high-parameterized time series models," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2014-010, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    6. Jin, Shaobo & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan, 2018. "Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: an orthogonal case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-010 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Xing, Li-Min & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2022. "Forecasting crude oil prices with shrinkage methods: Can nonconvex penalty and Huber loss help?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Shaobo Jin & Irini Moustaki & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2018. "Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 628-649, September.
    10. Lee, Kuo-Jung & Chen, Ray-Bing & Wu, Ying Nian, 2016. "Bayesian variable selection for finite mixture model of linear regressions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Pei Wang & Shunjie Chen & Sijia Yang, 2022. "Recent Advances on Penalized Regression Models for Biological Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Yanfang Zhang & Chuanhua Wei & Xiaolin Liu, 2022. "Group Logistic Regression Models with l p,q Regularization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Xingcai Zhou & Yu Xiang, 2022. "ADMM-Based Differential Privacy Learning for Penalized Quantile Regression on Distributed Functional Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    15. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    16. Craig, Sarah J.C. & Kenney, Ana M. & Lin, Junli & Paul, Ian M. & Birch, Leann L. & Savage, Jennifer S. & Marini, Michele E. & Chiaromonte, Francesca & Reimherr, Matthew L. & Makova, Kateryna D., 2023. "Constructing a polygenic risk score for childhood obesity using functional data analysis," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 66-86.
    17. Julien Chevallier & Dominique Guégan & Stéphane Goutte, 2021. "Is It Possible to Forecast the Price of Bitcoin?," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-44, May.
    18. JinXing Che & YouLong Yang, 2017. "Stochastic correlation coefficient ensembles for variable selection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1721-1742, July.
    19. Eunyoung Park & Sookhee Kwon & Jihoon Kwon & Richard Sylvester & Il Do Ha, 2020. "Penalized h‐likelihood approach for variable selection in AFT random‐effect models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(1), pages 52-71, February.
    20. Dominique Guegan & Peter Martey Addo & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01835164, HAL.
    21. Dominique Guegan & Peter Martey Addo & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Post-Print halshs-01835164, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3192-:d:1198792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.