Author
Listed:
- van Erp, Sara
(Tilburg University)
- Oberski, Daniel L.
- Mulder, Joris
Abstract
In linear regression problems with many predictors, penalized regression techniques are often used to guard against overfitting and to select variables relevant for predicting the outcome. Classical regression techniques find coefficients that minimize a squared residual; penalized regression adds a penalty term to this residual to limit the coefficients’ sizes, thereby preventing over- fitting. Many classical penalization techniques have a Bayesian counterpart, which result in the same solutions when a specific prior distribution is used in combination with posterior mode estimates. Compared to classical penalization techniques, the Bayesian penalization techniques perform similarly or even better, and they offer additional advantages such as readily available uncertainty estimates, automatic estimation of the penalty parameter, and more flexibility in terms of penalties that can be considered. As a result, Bayesian penalization is becoming increasingly popular. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on Bayesian penalization. We will compare different priors for penalization that have been proposed in the literature in terms of their characteristics, shrinkage behavior, and performance in terms of prediction and variable selection in order to aid researchers to navigate the many prior options.
Suggested Citation
van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018.
"Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression,"
OSF Preprints
cg8fq_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cg8fq_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cg8fq_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cg8fq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.