IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2021i1p44-d709767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Combined Interval Type-2 Fuzzy MCDM Framework for the Resilient Supplier Selection Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Amirali Hoseini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 13114-16846, Iran)

  • Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani

    (School of Engineering, Catholic University of the North, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo 1240000, Chile)

  • Paulius Skačkauskas

    (Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Alireza Fallahpour

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Sara Saberi

    (Robert A. Foisie School of Business, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA)

Abstract

Selecting the most resilient supplier is a crucial problem for organizations and managers in the supply chain. However, due to the inherited high degree of uncertainty in real-life projects, developing a decision-making framework in a crisp or fuzzy environment may not present accurate or reliable results for the managers. For this reason, it is better to evaluate the potential suppliers in an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy (IT2F) environment for better dealing with this ambiguity. This study developed an improved combined IT2F Best Worst Method (BWM) and IT2F technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) model “Atieh Sazan” Co. as a case study, such that the IT2FBWM was employed for obtaining the weight of criteria. The IT2FTOPSIS was utilized for ranking the potential suppliers based on Hamming distance measure. In both phases, the opinions of experts as IT2F linguistic terms were employed for weighting the criteria and obtaining the relative importance of the alternatives in terms of the evaluative criteria. After obtaining the final results, the proposed model was validated by replacing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) approaches separately instead of BWM for weighting the criteria. After executing both new models, it was found that the final ranking was similar to the final ranking of the proposed model, representing the reliability and accuracy of the obtained results. Moreover, it was concluded that the resilient criteria of “Reorganization” and “Redundancy” are the most determinant measures for selecting the best supplier rather than measures in the Iranian Construction Industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Amirali Hoseini & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Paulius Skačkauskas & Alireza Fallahpour & Sara Saberi, 2021. "A Combined Interval Type-2 Fuzzy MCDM Framework for the Resilient Supplier Selection Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:44-:d:709767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/1/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/1/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanja Puzović & Jasmina Vesić Vasović & Dragan D. Milanović & Vladan Paunović, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Open Innovation Partner Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:44-:d:709767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.