IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i8p1221-d789432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stepwise Algorithm for Linearly Combining Biomarkers under Youden Index Maximization

Author

Listed:
  • Rocío Aznar-Gimeno

    (Department of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón (ITAINNOVA), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Luis M. Esteban

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Escuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, La Almunia de Doña Godina, 50100 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Rafael del-Hoyo-Alonso

    (Department of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón (ITAINNOVA), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ángel Borque-Fernando

    (Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet and IIS-Aragón, Paseo Isabel La Católica 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Gerardo Sanz

    (Department of Statistical Methods and Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems-BIFI, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Combining multiple biomarkers to provide predictive models with a greater discriminatory ability is a discipline that has received attention in recent years. Choosing the probability threshold that corresponds to the highest combined marker accuracy is key in disease diagnosis. The Youden index is a statistical metric that provides an appropriate synthetic index for diagnostic accuracy and a good criterion for choosing a cut-off point to dichotomize a biomarker. In this study, we present a new stepwise algorithm for linearly combining continuous biomarkers to maximize the Youden index. To investigate the performance of our algorithm, we analyzed a wide range of simulated scenarios and compared its performance with that of five other linear combination methods in the literature (a stepwise approach introduced by Yin and Tian, the min-max approach, logistic regression, a parametric approach under multivariate normality and a non-parametric kernel smoothing approach). The obtained results show that our proposed stepwise approach showed similar results to other algorithms in normal simulated scenarios and outperforms all other algorithms in non-normal simulated scenarios. In scenarios of biomarkers with the same means and a different covariance matrix for the diseased and non-diseased population, the min-max approach outperforms the rest. The methods were also applied on two real datasets (to discriminate Duchenne muscular dystrophy and prostate cancer), whose results also showed a higher predictive ability in our algorithm in the prostate cancer database.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocío Aznar-Gimeno & Luis M. Esteban & Rafael del-Hoyo-Alonso & Ángel Borque-Fernando & Gerardo Sanz, 2022. "A Stepwise Algorithm for Linearly Combining Biomarkers under Youden Index Maximization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:1221-:d:789432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haiqiang Ma & Jin Yang & Sheng Xu & Chao Liu & Qinyi Zhang, 2022. "Combination of multiple functional markers to improve diagnostic accuracy," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 44-63, January.
    2. Hua Ma & Susan Halabi & Aiyi Liu, 2019. "On the Use of Min-Max Combination of Biomarkers to Maximize the Partial Area under the ROC Curve," Journal of Probability and Statistics, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, February.
    3. Yu, Wenbao & Park, Taesung, 2015. "Two simple algorithms on linear combination of multiple biomarkers to maximize partial area under the ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 15-27.
    4. Luis Mariano Esteban & Gerardo Sanz & Angel Borque, 2011. "A step-by-step algorithm for combining diagnostic tests," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 899-911, February.
    5. Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Tianxi Cai & Gary Longton, 2006. "Combining Predictors for Classification Using the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 221-229, March.
    6. Yin, Jingjing & Tian, Lili, 2014. "Joint inference about sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point associated with Youden index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Rota, Matteo & Antolini, Laura, 2014. "Finding the optimal cut-point for Gaussian and Gamma distributed biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haneen Hamam & Ali Raza & Manal M. Alqarni & Jan Awrejcewicz & Muhammad Rafiq & Nauman Ahmed & Emad E. Mahmoud & Witold Pawłowski & Muhammad Mohsin, 2022. "Stochastic Modelling of Lassa Fever Epidemic Disease," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rocío Aznar-Gimeno & Luis M. Esteban & Gerardo Sanz & Rafael del-Hoyo-Alonso & Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella, 2021. "Incorporating a New Summary Statistic into the Min–Max Approach: A Min–Max–Median, Min–Max–IQR Combination of Biomarkers for Maximising the Youden Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Xin Huang & Gengsheng Qin & Yixin Fang, 2011. "Optimal Combinations of Diagnostic Tests Based on AUC," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 568-576, June.
    3. Tiago Dias-Domingues & Helena Mouriño & Nuno Sepúlveda, 2024. "Classification Methods for the Serological Status Based on Mixtures of Skew-Normal and Skew-t Distributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Kajal Lahiri & Liu Yang, 2023. "Predicting binary outcomes based on the pair-copula construction," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 3089-3119, June.
    5. Yuanjia Wang & Huaihou Chen & Runze Li & Naihua Duan & Roberto Lewis-Fernández, 2011. "Prediction-Based Structured Variable Selection through the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 896-905, September.
    6. Adimari, Gianfranco & To, Duc-Khanh & Chiogna, Monica & Scatozza, Francesca & Facchiano, Antonio, 2024. "Likelihood-type confidence regions for optimal sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Chen, Xiwei & Vexler, Albert & Markatou, Marianthi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval estimation of best linear combinations of biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 186-198.
    8. Sonia Pérez-Fernández & Pablo Martínez-Camblor & Peter Filzmoser & Norberto Corral, 2021. "Visualizing the decision rules behind the ROC curves: understanding the classification process," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 135-161, March.
    9. Osamu Komori, 2011. "A boosting method for maximization of the area under the ROC curve," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(5), pages 961-979, October.
    10. Zhongkai Liu & Howard D. Bondell, 2019. "Binormal Precision–Recall Curves for Optimal Classification of Imbalanced Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(1), pages 141-161, April.
    11. Yusuf Yıldırım & Anirban Sanyal, 2022. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Early Warning Indicators: An Application of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Approach to Panel Data," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 69(4), pages 557-597, December.
    12. Graf Alexandra C. & Bauer Peter, 2009. "Model Selection Based on FDR-Thresholding Optimizing the Area under the ROC-Curve," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Qing Lu & Nancy Obuchowski & Sungho Won & Xiaofeng Zhu & Robert C. Elston, 2010. "Using the Optimal Robust Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for Predictive Genetic Tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 586-593, June.
    14. Choi, Sungwoo & Park, Junyong, 2014. "Nonparametric additive model with grouped lasso and maximizing area under the ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 313-325.
    15. Weining Shen & Jing Ning & Ying Yuan & Anna S. Lok & Ziding Feng, 2018. "Model†free scoring system for risk prediction with application to hepatocellular carcinoma study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 239-248, March.
    16. Yuxin Zhu & Mei‐Cheng Wang, 2022. "Obtaining optimal cutoff values for tree classifiers using multiple biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 128-140, March.
    17. Chiang, Chin-Tsang & Chiu, Chih-Heng, 2012. "Nonparametric and semiparametric optimal transformations of markers," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 124-141, January.
    18. Schmid Matthias & Hothorn Torsten & Krause Friedemann & Rabe Christina, 2012. "A PAUC-based Estimation Technique for Disease Classification and Biomarker Selection," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Silver, Steven D. & Raseta, Marko & Bazarova, Alina, 2023. "Stochastic resonance in the recovery of signal from agent price expectations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Zhang Zhiwei & Ma Shujie & Nie Lei & Soon Guoxing, 2017. "A Quantitative Concordance Measure for Comparing and Combining Treatment Selection Markers," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:1221-:d:789432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.