IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v69y2014icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding the optimal cut-point for Gaussian and Gamma distributed biomarkers

Author

Listed:
  • Rota, Matteo
  • Antolini, Laura

Abstract

Categorization is often needed for clinical decision making when dealing with diagnostic (prognostic) biomarkers and a binary outcome (true disease status). Four common methods used to dichotomize a continuous biomarker X are compared: the minimum P-value, the Youden index, the concordance probability and the point closest-to-(0, 1) corner in the ROC plane. These methods are compared from a theoretical point of view under Normal or Gamma biomarker distributions, showing whether or not they lead to the identification of the same true cut-point. The performance of the corresponding non-parametric estimators is then compared by simulation. Two motivating examples are presented. In all simulation scenarios, the point closest-to-(0, 1) corner in the ROC plane and concordance probability approaches outperformed the other methods. Both these methods showed good performance in the estimation of the optimal cut-point of a biomarker. However, when methods do not lead to the same optimal cut-point, scientists should focus on which one is truly what they want to estimate, and use it in practice. In addition, to improve communicability, the Youden index or the concordance probability associated to the estimated cut-point could be reported to summarize the associated classification accuracy. The use of the minimum P-value approach for cut-point finding is strongly not recommended because its objective function is computed under the null hypothesis of absence of association between the true disease status and X. This is in contrast with the presence of some discrimination potential of X that leads to the dichotomization issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Rota, Matteo & Antolini, Laura, 2014. "Finding the optimal cut-point for Gaussian and Gamma distributed biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313002600
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Chin-Ying & Tian, Lili & Schisterman, Enrique F., 2012. "Exact confidence interval estimation for the Youden index and its corresponding optimal cut-point," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1103-1114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Dias-Domingues & Helena Mouriño & Nuno Sepúlveda, 2024. "Classification Methods for the Serological Status Based on Mixtures of Skew-Normal and Skew-t Distributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Rocío Aznar-Gimeno & Luis M. Esteban & Rafael del-Hoyo-Alonso & Ángel Borque-Fernando & Gerardo Sanz, 2022. "A Stepwise Algorithm for Linearly Combining Biomarkers under Youden Index Maximization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Elkhafifi, Faiza F. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2014. "Three-group ROC analysis: A nonparametric predictive approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 69-81.
    2. Poon, Wai-Yin & Qiu, Shi-Fang & Tang, Man-Lai, 2015. "Confidence interval construction for the Youden index based on partially validated series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 116-134.
    3. Wang, Dongliang & Tian, Lili & Zhao, Yichuan, 2017. "Smoothed empirical likelihood for the Youden index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Yin, Jingjing & Tian, Lili, 2014. "Joint inference about sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point associated with Youden index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Qiu, Zhiping & Peng, Limin & Manatunga, Amita & Guo, Ying, 2019. "A smooth nonparametric approach to determining cut-points of a continuous scale," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 186-210.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.