IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i4p626-d752032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Intellectual Capital Management Method for Selecting and Prioritizing Intangible-Related Aspects: A Case Study of Small Enterprise in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Ratapol Wudhikarn

    (Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    A Research Group of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep

    (Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    A Research Group of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    China Intelligence Center, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

This study develops a new integrated approach for improving deficiencies relating to executives’ intuitive or illogical decisions, mainly found in past intellectual capital management (ICM) methods. To simultaneously rectify several flaws, the process model of intellectual capital (IC), a traditional ICM method, is integrated using decision science methods—the analytic network process (ANP) and quality function deployment (QFD). The process model of IC is adopted as a core procedure of the proposed ICM approach. ANP is integrated to improve the ability to consider relationships among the IC critical factors and their impacts, while QFD is included to facilitate the systematic consideration and identification of correlations, linkages, and impacts between all IC-related elements from the business concept to strategic plans. The proposed method was applied to two case studies in one real enterprise in Thailand. The results of the implementation reveal the priorities of all IC-related aspects, and the first priority of key success factors (KSFs), key performance indicators (KPIs), and action plans (APs) are all associated with the organization in the structural capital dimension. The results demonstrate that the method may offer advantages with respect to the conceptual expectations and may prioritize critical IC factors and identify their weights. Furthermore, the improved method could indicate the correlations and impacts between related elements, such as critical factors and associated indicators. This study proposes a new comprehensive and systematic management framework by integrating different concepts—decision science methods and the ICM method. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this improved approach has not been explored or proposed in earlier studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratapol Wudhikarn & Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep, 2022. "An Improved Intellectual Capital Management Method for Selecting and Prioritizing Intangible-Related Aspects: A Case Study of Small Enterprise in Thailand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:626-:d:752032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/626/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/626/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella Marcarelli, 2018. "An integrated network model for performance management: a focus on healthcare organisations," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 163-180.
    2. Sivanesan Murali & Singaram Pugazhendhi, 2016. "An integrated model to identify and rank the after sales service strategies of firms engaged in household appliances business," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 99-124.
    3. Jian Xu & Binghan Wang, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Financial Performance and Companies’ Sustainable Growth: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. L.C. Koo & Hannah Koo, 2007. "Holistic approach for diagnosing, prioritising, implementing and monitoring effective strategies through synergetic fusion of SWOT, Balanced Scorecard and QFD," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 62-78.
    5. Fatemeh Ghasemzadeh & Mahsa Pishdar & Jurgita Antuchevičienė, 2017. "Prioritization of petroleum supply chains’ disruption management strategies using combined framework of BSC approach, fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Choquet integral operator," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 897-919, September.
    6. Madjid Tavana & Nasim Mousavi & Sina Golara, 2013. "A fuzzy-QFD approach to balanced scorecard using an analytic network process," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 331-363.
    7. N/A, 2004. "Index for 2004," European Union Politics, , vol. 5(4), pages 511-512, December.
    8. Modak, Mousumi & Pathak, Khanindra & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2017. "Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 181-191.
    9. Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & V. G. R. Chandran & Evelyn S. Devadason, 2018. "Measuring Human Capital in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: What Matters?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 605-623, June.
    10. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2018. "A literature review on performance measures of logistics management: an intellectual capital perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4490-4520, July.
    11. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2018. "A literature review on performance measures of logistics management : an intellectual capital perspective," Post-Print hal-02312140, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrian Sfichi & Eduard Zadobrischi & Narcisa Sfichi & Marian Bădeliță & Mihai Medrihan, 2022. "Utility of Sharing Economy Principles in the Development of Applications Dedicated to Construction Cost Estimation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Adelaide Martins & Manuel Castelo Branco & Pedro Novo Melo & Carolina Machado, 2022. "Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Chau Le & Bach Nguyen & Vinh Vo, 2024. "Do intangible assets help SMEs in underdeveloped markets gain access to external finance?—the case of Vietnam," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 833-855, February.
    4. Nanyi Wang & Chang Shi & Xinhui Kang, 2022. "Design of a Disinfection and Epidemic Prevention Robot Based on Fuzzy QFD and the ARIZ Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2020. "Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers," Post-Print hal-03188190, HAL.
    2. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2020. "Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Aisling Bonner & George Onofrei & Paul Humphreys & Michael Margey & Trevor Cadden, 2021. "Entrepreneurial versus cooperative social capital: The impact on operational performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3854-3865, December.
    4. Bo-Rui Yan & Qian-Li Dong & Qian Li & Min Li, 2022. "A Study on Risk Measurement of Logistics in International Trade: A Case Study of the RCEP Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Popkova, Elena G. & Alekseev, Alexander N. & Lobova, Svetlana V. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2020. "The Theory of Innovation and Innovative Development. AI Scenarios in Russia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Chen, Yi-Ting & Sun, Edward W. & Chang, Ming-Feng & Lin, Yi-Bing, 2021. "Pragmatic real-time logistics management with traffic IoT infrastructure: Big data predictive analytics of freight travel time for Logistics 4.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    7. Jamali, Narjes & Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Liu, Peide, 2021. "Prioritization of aircraft maintenance unit strategies using fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Zheng, Guomeng & Ul Haq, Muhammad Zia & Huo, Baofeng & Zhang, Yanming & Yue, Xiaochen, 2024. "Leveraging intellectual capital for building a supply chain circular economy system: A knowledge-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    9. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    10. Barunik, Jozef & Vacha, Lukas, 2010. "Monte Carlo-based tail exponent estimator," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(21), pages 4863-4874.
    11. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    12. M. Ionita & P. Scholz & S. Chelcea, 2016. "Assessment of droughts in Romania using the Standardized Precipitation Index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(3), pages 1483-1498, April.
    13. Sakinah Mat Zin & Ahmad Azrin Adnan & Iskandar Hasan Abdullah, 2017. "How Can Ibn Khaldun’s Economic Philosophy Revive the Intellectual Capital of Entrepreneurs," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 164-164, June.
    14. Govind, Ajit & Chen, Jing Ming & Bernier, Pierre & Margolis, Hank & Guindon, Luc & Beaudoin, Andre, 2011. "Spatially distributed modeling of the long-term carbon balance of a boreal landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2780-2795.
    15. Cherchye, Laurens & Knox Lovell, C.A. & Moesen, Wim & Van Puyenbroeck, Tom, 2007. "One market, one number? A composite indicator assessment of EU internal market dynamics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 749-779, April.
    16. Sandy Tubeuf & Marc Perronnin, 2008. "New prospects in the analysis of inequalities in health: a measurement of health encompassing several dimensions of health," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 08/01, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Rengui Jiang & Jiancang Xie & Hailong He & Jungang Luo & Jiwei Zhu, 2015. "Use of four drought indices for evaluating drought characteristics under climate change in Shaanxi, China: 1951–2012," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2885-2903, February.
    18. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Olga Alipova & Lada Litvinova & Andrey Lovakov & Maria Yudkevich, 2018. "Inbreds And Non-Inbreds Among Russian Academics: Short-Term Similarity And Long-Term Differences In Productivity," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/EDU/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Queiroz, Bernardo L & Gonzaga, Marcos Roberto & Nogales, Ana Maria & Torrente, Bruno & de Abreu, Daisy Maria Xavier, 2019. "Life expectancy, adult mortality and completeness of death counts in Brazil and regions: comparative analysis of IHME, IBGE and other researchers estimates of levels and trends," OSF Preprints pj3sx, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:626-:d:752032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.