IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i24p4775-d1004699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Inferring and Decision Making in Multi-Dimensional Volatile Binary Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Changbo Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110169, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Ke Zhou

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Fengzhen Tang

    (State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110169, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yandong Tang

    (State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110169, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xiaoli Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Bailu Si

    (School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The ability to track the changes of the surrounding environment is critical for humans and animals to adapt their behaviors. In high-dimensional environments, the interactions between each dimension need to be estimated for better perception and decision making, for example in volatile or social cognition tasks. We develop a hierarchical Bayesian model for inferring and decision making in multi-dimensional volatile environments. The hierarchical Bayesian model is composed of a hierarchical perceptual model and a response model. Using the variational Bayes method, we derived closed-form update rules. These update rules also constitute a complete predictive coding scheme. To validate the effectiveness of the model in multi-dimensional volatile environments, we defined a probabilistic gambling task modified from a two-armed bandit. Simulation results demonstrated that an agent endowed with the proposed hierarchical Bayesian model is able to infer and to update its internal belief on the tendency and volatility of the sensory inputs. Based on the internal belief of the sensory inputs, the agent yielded near-optimal behavior following its response model. Our results pointed this model a viable framework to explain the temporal dynamics of human decision behavior in complex and high dimensional environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Changbo Zhu & Ke Zhou & Fengzhen Tang & Yandong Tang & Xiaoli Li & Bailu Si, 2022. "A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Inferring and Decision Making in Multi-Dimensional Volatile Binary Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-35, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4775-:d:1004699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali al-Nowaihi & Sanjit Dhami, 2010. "Probability Weighting Functions," Discussion Papers in Economics 10/10, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    2. Jean Daunizeau & Hanneke E M den Ouden & Matthias Pessiglione & Stefan J Kiebel & Karl J Friston & Klaas E Stephan, 2010. "Observing the Observer (II): Deciding When to Decide," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Marc O. Ernst & Martin S. Banks, 2002. "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6870), pages 429-433, January.
    4. M Berk Mirza & Rick A Adams & Christoph Mathys & Karl J Friston, 2018. "Human visual exploration reduces uncertainty about the sensed world," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Weiler & Vahid Rahmati & Marcel Isstas & Johann Wutke & Andreas Walter Stark & Christian Franke & Jürgen Graf & Christian Geis & Otto W. Witte & Mark Hübener & Jürgen Bolz & Troy W. Margrie & Kn, 2024. "A primary sensory cortical interareal feedforward inhibitory circuit for tacto-visual integration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Catarina Mendonça & Pietro Mandelli & Ville Pulkki, 2016. "Modeling the Perception of Audiovisual Distance: Bayesian Causal Inference and Other Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Dimitrije Marković & Jan Gläscher & Peter Bossaerts & John O’Doherty & Stefan J Kiebel, 2015. "Modeling the Evolution of Beliefs Using an Attentional Focus Mechanism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    4. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Adam N Sanborn & Ulrik R Beierholm, 2016. "Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Seth W. Egger & Stephen G. Lisberger, 2022. "Neural structure of a sensory decoder for motor control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Xiaochen Zhang & Lingling Jin & Jie Zhao & Jiazhen Li & Ding-Bang Luh & Tiansheng Xia, 2022. "The Influences of Different Sensory Modalities and Cognitive Loads on Walking Navigation: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Johannes Burge & Priyank Jaini, 2017. "Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Yingjie Lai & Chaemoon Yoo & Xiaomin Zhou & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Elements of Food Service Design for Low-Carbon Tourism-Based on Dine-In Tourist Behavior and Attitudes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D., 2012. "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 81-103.
    11. Jean-François Patri & Pascal Perrier & Jean-Luc Schwartz & Julien Diard, 2018. "What drives the perceptual change resulting from speech motor adaptation? Evaluation of hypotheses in a Bayesian modeling framework," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, January.
    12. Florent Meyniel, 2020. "Brain dynamics for confidence-weighted learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Jennifer Laura Lee & Wei Ji Ma, 2021. "Point-estimating observer models for latent cause detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, October.
    14. Anna Lambrechts & Vincent Walsh & Virginie van Wassenhove, 2013. "Evidence Accumulation in the Magnitude System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Noelle R B Stiles & Monica Li & Carmel A Levitan & Yukiyasu Kamitani & Shinsuke Shimojo, 2018. "What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Elina Stengård & Ronald van den Berg, 2019. "Imperfect Bayesian inference in visual perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Lunn, Pete & Duffy, David, 2010. "The Euro Through the Looking-Glass: Perceived Inflation Following the 2002 Currency Changeover," Papers WP338, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    18. Igor Linkov & Susan Cormier & Joshua Gold & F. Kyle Satterstrom & Todd Bridges, 2012. "Using Our Brains to Develop Better Policy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 374-380, March.
    19. Dhami, Sanjit & al-Nowaihi, Ali, 2013. "An extension of the Becker proposition to non-expected utility theory," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 10-20.
    20. Seha Kim & Johannes Burge, 2020. "Natural scene statistics predict how humans pool information across space in surface tilt estimation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4775-:d:1004699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.